Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How Does Trade Affect the Environment?

  • Chapter
Is Economic Growth Sustainable?

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

History is full of examples of how globalization has affected environmental outcomes. Human migration has profoundly affected the natural environment. Much early trade was commodity based— trade in fish, agriculture, timber, and other raw materials all caused exporting countries to increase their exploitation of the natural environment beyond the level that would have occurred to satisfy local consumption demand. Nevertheless, it is only during the past 20 years that the interaction between trade and the environment has become a subject of sometimes heated public policy debate. This has been motivated by a variety of forces that have recently converged. A growing concern about the seriousness of environmental problems has prompted environmentalists to look at the role of globalization in contributing to pressure on the environment. An increase in the reliance on rules-based institutions to support and manage international trade and investment has increased the scope for conflicts between what used to be thought of as domestic policy (such as environmental regulations) and international trade and investment policy. And the rapid growth of international trade and investment flows has increased concerns about competitiveness and market access, both of which are sometimes seen to conflict with environmental policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Antweiler, W., B.R. Copeland, and M.S. Taylor (2001), ‘Is Free Trade Good for the Environment?’ American Economic Review 91 (4): 877–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K., P. Dasgupta, G. Daily, P. Ehrlich, L. Goulder, G. Heal, S. Levin, K.-G. Maler, S. Schneider, D. Starrett, and B. Walker (2004), ‘Are We Consuming Too Much?’ Journal of Economic Perspectives, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baland, J.M. and J.P. Platteau (1996), Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is there a Role for Rural Communities, Oxford, U.K.: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, R.E. (1971), ‘Determinants of the Commodity Structure of U.S. Trade,’ American Economic Review 61 (1): 126–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E.B. and J.C. Burgess (2001), ‘The Economics of Tropical Deforestation,’ Journal of Economic Surveys 15 (3): 413–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, S. (1994), ‘Strategic Environmental Policy and International Trade,’ Journal of Public Economics 54: 325–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battigalli, P. and G. Maggi (March 2003), ‘International Agreement on Product Standards: An Incomplete Contracting Approach,’ NBER Working Paper 9533.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W.J. and D.F. Bradford (1972), ‘Detrimental Externalities and Non-Convexity of the Production Set,’ Economica, New Series, 39(154): 160–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, R. and V. Henderson (2000), ‘Effects of Air Quality Regulations on Polluting Industries,’ Journal of Political Economy 108 (2): 379–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeron, N. (2004), ‘International Trade and Conservation with Costly Resource Management,’ mimeo, University of Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohn, H. and R.T. Deacon (2000), ‘Ownership Risk, Investment, and the Use of Natural Resources,’ American Economic Review 90 (3): 526–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J.A. and M.S. Taylor (1997a), ‘International Trade and Open Access Renewable Resources: The Small Open Economy Case,’ Canadian Journal of Economics 30 (3): 526–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, J.A. and M.S. Taylor (1997b), ‘International Trade between Consumer and Conservationist Countries,’ Resource and Energy Economics 19 (4): 267–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W.A. and M.S. Taylor (2006), ‘Economic Growth and the Environment: A Review of theory and empirics,’ in Philippe Aghion and Steven Durlauf (eds), Handbook of Economic Growth. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnermeier, S. and A. Levinson (2004), ‘Examining the Evidence on Environmental Regulations and Industry Location,’ Journal of the Environment and Development 13: 6–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chichilnisky, G. (1994), ‘North-South Trade and the Global Environment,’ American Economic Review 84 (4): 851–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coate, S. and S. Morris (1995), ‘On the Form of Transfers to Special Interests,’ Journal of Political Economy 103: 1210–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.S. and M.L. Weitzman (1975), ‘A Marxian Model of Enclosures,’ Journal of Development Economics 1: 287–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M.A. and R.J.R. Elliott (2005), ‘FDI and the Capital Intensity of “Dirty” Sectors: A Missing Piece of the Pollution Haven Puzzle,’ Review of Development Economics 9: 530–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. (1994), ‘International Trade and the Environment: Policy Reform in a Polluted Small Open Economy,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26: 44–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. (2001), ‘Trade and Environment: Product Standards in a National Treatment Regime,’ mimeo, University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (1994), ‘North-South Trade and the Environment,’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 755–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (1995), ‘Trade and Transboundary Pollution,’ American Economic Review 85 (4): 716–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (1997), ‘The Trade-Induced Degradation Hypothesis,’ Resource and Energy Economics 19: 321–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (1999), ‘Trade, Spatial Separation, and the Environment,’ Journal ofInternational Economics 47: 137–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (2003), Trade and the Environment: Theory and Evidence, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (2004), ‘Trade, Growth and The Environment,’ Journal of Economic Literature 42 (1): 7–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, B.R. and M.S. Taylor (2009), ‘Trade, Tragedy and the Commons,’ American Economic Review 99: 725–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, H. (1993), ‘The Perils of Free Trade,’ Scientific American 269: 24–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deacon, R.T. (1994), ‘Deforestation and the Rule of Law in a Cross-Section of Countries,’ Land Economics 70 (4): 414–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J.M., M.E. Lovely, and H. Wang (2009), ‘Are Foreign Investors Attracted to Weak Environmental Regulations? Evaluating the Evidence from China,’ Journal of Development Economics 90: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Meza, D. and J.R. Gould (1992), ‘The Social Efficiency of Private Decisions to Enforce Property Rights,’ Journal of Political Economy 100: 561–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, H. (1967), ‘Toward a Theory of Property Rights,’ American Economic Review 57 (2): 347–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A.K. (1985), ‘Tax Policy in Open Economies,’ in A.J. Auerbach and M. Feldstein (eds), Handbook of Public Economics, Vol. 1. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ederington, W.J. and J. Minier (2003), ‘Is Environmental Policy a Secondary Trade Barrier? An Empirical Analysis,’ Canadian Journal ofEconomics 36: 137–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ederington, W.J., A. Levinson, and J. Minier (2004), ‘Trade Liberalization and Pollution Havens,’ Advances in Economic Analysis and Policy 4(2), Article 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eskeland, G. and A.E. Harrison (2003), ‘Moving to Greener Pastures? Multinationals and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis,’ Journal of Development Economics 70: 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, S. (2004), ‘Deforestation, Openness and Property Rights,’ Land Economics 80 (2): 174–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R. and P. Serra (2000), ‘Standards and Protection,’ Journal of International Economics 52: 377–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, M. (2001), ‘Trade and the Adoption of Environmental Standards,’ Working Paper, University of Canberra, July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A. (2003), ‘The Environment and Globalization,’ NBER Working Paper 10090.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, J.A. and A.K. Rose (2005), ‘Is Trade Good or Bad for the Environment? Sorting out the Causality,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 87 (1): 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawande, K. (1999), ‘Trade Barriers as Outcomes from Two-Stage Games: Evi-dence,’ Canadian Journal of Economics 32 (4): 1028–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H.S. (1954), ‘The Economic Theory of a Common Property Resource: The Fishery,’ Journal ofPolitical Economy 63 (2): 124–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, W.B. and R.J. Shadbegian (2002), ‘When do Firms Shift Production Across States to Avoid Environmental Regulation?’ NBER Working Paper 8705.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greaker, M. (2006), ‘Spillovers in the Development of New Pollution Abatement Technology: A New Look at the Porter-Hypothesis,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 52: 411–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenstone, M. (2002), ‘The Impacts of Environmental Regulations on Industrial Activity: Evidence from the 1970 and the 1977 Clean Air Act Amendments and the Census of Manufactures,’ Journal of Political Economy 110: 1175–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M. and A.B. Krueger (1993), ‘Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement,’ in Peter M. Garber (ed.), The Mexico-U.S. Free Trade Agreement, Cambridge and London: MIT Press, pp. 13–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, S. and D. Roy (2008), ‘National Treatment and the Optimal Regulation of Environmental Externalities,’ Canadian Journal of Economics 41: 1445–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanna, R. (2006), ‘U.S. Environmental Regulation and FDI: Evidence from a Panel of U.S. Based Multinational Firms,’ Development Research Institute Working Paper No. 23, New York University, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotte, L., N. Van Long, and H. Tian (2000), ‘International Trade with Endogenous Enforcement of Property Rights,’ Journal of Development Economics 62 (1): 25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, A., S. Peterson, P. Portney, and R. Stavins (1995), ‘Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us?’ The Journal of Economic Literature 33: 132–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, M. (1997), ‘Particulate Pollution Trends in the United States,’ Regional Science and Urban Economics 27 (1): 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalt, J.P. (1988), ‘The Impact of Domestic Environmental Regulatory Policies on U.S. International Competitiveness’ in A.M. Spence and Heather A. Hazard (eds), International competitiveness, Cambridge, MA: Harper and Row, Ballinger, pp. 221–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawahara, S. (2008), ‘Electoral Competition with Environmental Policy as a Second Best Transfer,’ mimeo, Fukushima University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, W. and A. Levinson (2002), ‘Pollution Abatement Costs and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to US States,’ Review ofEconomics and Statistics 84: 691–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kjaergaard, T. (1994), ‘The Danish Revolution, 1500–1800: An Ecohistorical Interpretation,’ Studies in Environment & History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E.E. (1984), Sources of International Comparative Advantage: Theory and Evidence, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (1996), ‘Environmental Regulations and Industry Location: International and Domestic Evidence,’ in Jagdish N. Bhagwati and Robert E. Hudec (eds), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 429–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, A. (1999), ‘State Taxes and Interstate Hazardous Waste Shipments,’ American Economic Review 89: 666–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson A. and M.S. Taylor (2008), ‘Trade and the Environment: Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect,’ International Economic Review 49: 223–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, J.A., W.W. McHone, and D.L. Millimet (2004), ‘Effects of Environmental Regulation on Foreign and Domestic Plant Births: Is There a Home Field Advantage?’ Journal of Urban Economics 56: 303–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, J.A., W.W. McHone, D.L. Millimet, and P.G. Fredriksson (2003), ‘Effects of Environmental Regulations on Manufacturing Plant Births: Evidence from a Propensity Score Matching Estimator,’ Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (4): 944–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, R. (1997), ‘Environmental Externalities in Traditional Agriculture and the Impact of Trade Liberalization: The Case of Ghana,’ Journal of Development Economics 53 (1): 17–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López, R. (2000), ‘Trade Reform and Environmental Externalities in General Equilibrium: Analysis for an Archetype Poor Tropical Country,’ Environment and Development Economics 5 (4): 377–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, M. and J. Shogren (2002), ‘Unprotected Resources and Voracious World Markets,’ Discussion Paper, Resources for the Future, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAusland, C. (2004), ‘Environmental Regulation as Export Promotion: Product Standards for Dirty Intermediate Goods,’ Contributions to Economic Analysis & Policy 3 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • McAusland, C. (2008), ‘Trade, Politics, and the Environment: Tailpipe vs. Smokestack,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 55: 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neary, J.P. (2006), ‘International Trade and the Environment: Theoretical and Policy Linkages,’ Environmental and Resource Economics 33: 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990), ‘Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action,’ Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pethig, R. (1976), ‘Pollution, Welfare, and Environmental Policy in the Theory of Comparative Advantage,’ Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 2: 160–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E. and Claas van de Linde (1995), ‘Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship,’ Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (4): 97–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rauscher, M. (1997), International Trade, Factor Movements, and the Environment. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A. (1955), ‘The Fishery: The Objectives of Sole Ownership,’ Journal of Political Economy 63 (2): 116–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siebert, H. (1977), ‘Environmental Quality and the Gains from Trade,’ Kyklos 30: 657–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, D.A. (1972), ‘Fundamental Non Convexities in the Theory of Externalities,’Journal of Economic Theory 4: 180–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, D.M. (2006), ‘Product Standards, Trade Disputes, and Protectionism,’ Canadian Journal of Economics 39: 564–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobey, J.A. (1990), ‘The Effects of Domestic Environmental Policies on Patterns of World Trade: An Empirical Test,’ Kyklos 43 (2): 191–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M.M. and Charnovitz, S. (2001), ‘The Greening of the WTO,’ Foreign Affairs 80: 147–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, John D. (1996), ‘Capital Mobility and Environmental Standards: Is There a Theoretical Basis for a Race to the Bottom,’ in J.N. Bhagwati and R.E. Hudec (eds), Fair Trade and Harmonization: Prerequisites for Free Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 393–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, D.-Z. and L. Zhao (2006), ‘Pollution Havens and Industrial Agglomeration,’ mimeo, Kobe University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Brian R. Copeland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Columbia Business School, USA

    Geoffrey Heal (Paul Garrett Professor Of Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility) (Paul Garrett Professor Of Public Policy and Corporate Responsibility)

Copyright information

© 2010 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Copeland, B.R. (2010). How Does Trade Affect the Environment?. In: Heal, G. (eds) Is Economic Growth Sustainable?. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274280_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation