Skip to main content

Promotion and Relegation in Sporting Contests

  • Chapter
The Comparative Economics of Sport

Abstract

The conventional model of a team sports league is based on the North American major leagues which have a fixed number of members, entry is rare and only granted by permission of the incumbents (the closed system). European soccer leagues operate a system of promotion and relegation, effectively permitting entry on merit to all-comers (the open system). This paper examines the impact of openness on the incentive of teams to invest (expend effort) and share resources (redistribution) in the context of a Tullock contest. The main conclusion of the paper is that openness tends to enhance effort incentives, but diminishes the incentive to share income.

JEL Codes: L83, P51.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Baye M., Kovenock D. and de Vries C, “The Solution to the Tullock Rent-Seeking Game When R > 2: Mixed-Strategy Equilibria and Mean Dissipation Rates”, Public Choice, vol. 81, 1994, pp. 363–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzzacchi L., Szymanski S. and Valletti T., “Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Outcome: Open Leagues, Closed Leagues and Competitive Balance”, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, vol. 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 167–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hodiri M. and Quirk J., “An Economic Model of a Professional Sports League”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 79, 1971, pp. 1302–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, The European Model of Sport. Consultation Paper of DGX, Brussels, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fort R. and Quirk J., “Cross Subsidization, Incentives and Outcomes in Professional Team Sports Leagues”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 33, no. 3, 1995, pp. 1265–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton R. and Mcafee P., “Auctioning Entry in Tournaments”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 107, no. 3, 1999, pp. 573–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gradstein M. and Konrad K.A., “Orchestrating Rent Seeking Contests”, Economic Journal, vol. 109, no. 458, 1999, pp. 536–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamil S., Michie J. and Oughton C., The Business of Football: A Game of Two Halves?, Edinburgh, Mainstream, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn T. and Szymanski S., “The Americanization of European Football”, Economic Policy, vol. 28, 1999, pp. 205–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll R. and Zimbalist A., Sports, Jobs and Taxes, Brookings Institution Press, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noll R. “The Economics of Promotion and Relegation in Sports Leagues: The Case of English Football”, Journal of Sports Economics, vol. 3, no. 2, 2002, pp. 169–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neale W., “The Peculiar Economics of Professional Sport”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 78, no. 1, 1964, pp. 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nti K., “Comparative Statics of Contests and Rent-seeking Games”, International Economic Review, vol. 38, no. 1, 1997, pp. 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J. and Fort R., Pay Dirt: The Business of Professional Team Sports, Princeton ( N.J. ), Princeton University Press, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quirk J. and Fort R., Hard Ball: The Abuse of Power in Pro Team Sports, Princeton University Press, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S., “Monopoly Sports Leagues”, University of Minnesota Law Review, vol. 73, 1989, p. 643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross S. and Szymanski S., “Open Competition in League Sports”, Wisconsin Law Review, vol. 3, 2002, pp. 625–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rottenberg S., “The Baseball Players’ Labor Market”, Journal ofPolitical Economy, Vol. 64, 1956, pp. 242–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegfried J. and Zimbalist A., “The Economics of Sports Facilities and Their Communities”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 14, 2000, pp. 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski S., “The Economic Design of Sporting Contests”, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 41, no. 4, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski S. and Valletti T., “Incentive Effects of Second Prizes”, European Journal of Political Economy, vol. 21, no. 2, 2005, pp. 467–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B. and Trogdon J., “Losing to Win: Tournament Incentives in the National Basketball Association”, Journal of Labor Economics, vol. 20, no. 1, 2002, pp. 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tullock G., “Efficient Rent Seeking”, in Buchanan J., Tollison R. and Tullock G. (eds.), Toward a Theory of Rent Seeking Society, Texas &AM University Press, 1980, pp. 97–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrooman J., “The Economics of American Sports Leagues”, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 47, no. 4, 2000, pp. 364–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Stefan Szymanski and Tommaso M. Valletti

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Szymanski, S., Valletti, T.M. (2010). Promotion and Relegation in Sporting Contests. In: The Comparative Economics of Sport. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274273_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics