Abstract
This chapter compares conventional static measures of competitive balance with measures that take account of the mobility of teams into the upper ranks of professional leagues, which we call dynamic competitive balance. We use this measure to compare the open soccer leagues that permit entry by the process of promotion and relegation, to the closed leagues of North America where there is no automatic right of entry. We also identify the theoretical distribution of entrants to the top k ranks assuming that all teams have equal probabilities of winning. We find that the open leagues (OL) we study are less balanced, dynamically, than closed leagues (CL), and also that OL lie much further away from the theoretical distribution than CL.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andreff, W. and Staudohar, P., “The evolving model of european sports finance,” Journal of Sports Economics, vol. 1 no. 3, pp. 257–276, 2000.
European Commission, The European Model of Sport. Consultation paper of DGX, Brussels, 1998.
Fort, R. and Quirk, J., “Cross subsidization, incentives and outcomes in professional team sports leagues,” Journal of Economic Literature, vol. XXXIII no. 3, pp. 1265–1299, 1995.
Hall, S., Szymanski, S. and Zimbalist, A., “Testing causality between team performance and payroll: the case of major league baseball and english soccer,” Journal of Sports Economics, vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 149–168, 2002.
Hoehn, T. and Szymanski, S., “The Americanization of European football,” Economic Policy, vol. 28, pp. 205–240, 1999.
Horowitz, I. “The increasing competitive balance in major league baseball,” Review of Industrial Organization, vol. 12, pp. 373–387, 1997.
Humphreys, B., “Alternative measures of competitive balance in sports leagues,” Journal of Sports Economics, vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 133–148, 2002.
Kesenne, S., “Revenue sharing and competitive balance in professional team sports,” Journal of Sports Economics, vol. 1 no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2000.
Kipker, I., “Determinanten der zuschauernachfrage im professionellen teamsport: Wie wichtig ist die sportliche ausgeglichenheit?” Unpublished chapter of Ph.D. dissertation, 2000.
Koop, G., “Modelling the evolution of distributions: an application to Major League Baseball,” University of Glasgow Discussion Paper, 2002.
Levi, R., Mitchell, G., Volcker, P. and Will, G., The report of the independent members of the commissioner’s blue ribbon panel on baseball economics. Major League Baseball, NY, 2000.
Noll, R., “The economics of promotion and relegation in sports leagues; the case of English football,” Journal of Sports Economics, vol. 3 no. 2, pp. 169–203, 2002.
Quirk, J. and Fort, R., Pay Dirt: The Business of Professional Team Sports. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1992.
Rosen, S. and Sanderson, A., “Labour markets in professional sports,” Economic Journal, vol. 111 no. 469, pp. F47–F68, 2001.
Ross, S. and Lucke, R., “Why highly paid athletes deserve more antitrust protection than unionized factory workers,” Antitrust Bulletin, vol. 42 no. 3, pp. 641–679, 1997.
Ross, S. and Szymanski, S., “Promotion and relegation,” World Economics, vol. 2 no. 2, pp. 179–190, 2001.
Ross, S. and Szymanski, S., “Open competition in league sports,” Wisconsin Law Review, vol. 2002 no. 3, pp. 625–656, 2002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Luigi Buzzacchi, Stefan Szymanski and Tommaso M. Valletti
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Buzzacchi, L., Szymanski, S., Valletti, T.M. (2010). Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Outcome: Open Leagues, Closed Leagues and Competitive Balance. In: The Comparative Economics of Sport. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274273_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230274273_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31261-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-27427-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)