Skip to main content

The Role of Conscience in Medical Ethics

  • Chapter
Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics

Abstract

There are a number of areas of applied philosophy where the idea of conscience enjoys pivotal importance. In political philosophy, one may debate whether elected representatives, say in Parliament, have a duty first and foremost to vote in accordance with their individual conscience, or the manifesto they were elected on, should there be a conflict; in warfare it is debated whether soldiers should follow their conscience in disobeying orders they consider to be immoral; in business it is debated whether employees’ primary loyalty should be to their employers or to their conscience, in cases where employees suspect abuses are taking place. But, at least in the public mind, it is probably in health care that issues of conscience are most clearly apparent. Examples of doctors or nurses who refuse to assist in abortion, because it goes against their conscience, or of health care professionals who break the law on euthanasia or assisted suicide because they feel prompted to do so by their conscience, are all too easy to find. But what exactly is the appeal to conscience, and what authority should it have? When, if ever, should provisions for conscientious objection be made? In this chapter I shall explore the logical structure of appeals to conscience, and then ask how appeals to conscience are best analysed in medicine and nursing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Aquinas’s view on this is well summed up in Anthony Kenny (1987) ‘The Conscience of Sir Thomas More’, in Anthony Kenny, The Heritage of Wisdom: Essays in the History of Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. M. Hare (1963) Freedom and Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press), ch. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. M. Hare (1981) Moral Thinking (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 53ff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Jonathan Bennett (1994) ‘The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn’, in Peter Singer (ed.) Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 294–305.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mark R. Wicclair (2000) ‘Conscientious Objection in Medicine’, Bioethics, 14(3) (July), pp. 205–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. See in particular Raanan Gillon (1985) Philosophical Medical Ethics (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2005 Piers Benn

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Benn, P. (2005). The Role of Conscience in Medical Ethics. In: Athanassoulis, N. (eds) Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230273931_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics