Abstract
There are a number of areas of applied philosophy where the idea of conscience enjoys pivotal importance. In political philosophy, one may debate whether elected representatives, say in Parliament, have a duty first and foremost to vote in accordance with their individual conscience, or the manifesto they were elected on, should there be a conflict; in warfare it is debated whether soldiers should follow their conscience in disobeying orders they consider to be immoral; in business it is debated whether employees’ primary loyalty should be to their employers or to their conscience, in cases where employees suspect abuses are taking place. But, at least in the public mind, it is probably in health care that issues of conscience are most clearly apparent. Examples of doctors or nurses who refuse to assist in abortion, because it goes against their conscience, or of health care professionals who break the law on euthanasia or assisted suicide because they feel prompted to do so by their conscience, are all too easy to find. But what exactly is the appeal to conscience, and what authority should it have? When, if ever, should provisions for conscientious objection be made? In this chapter I shall explore the logical structure of appeals to conscience, and then ask how appeals to conscience are best analysed in medicine and nursing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Aquinas’s view on this is well summed up in Anthony Kenny (1987) ‘The Conscience of Sir Thomas More’, in Anthony Kenny, The Heritage of Wisdom: Essays in the History of Philosophy (Oxford: Blackwell).
R. M. Hare (1963) Freedom and Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press), ch. 5.
R. M. Hare (1981) Moral Thinking (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 53ff.
Jonathan Bennett (1994) ‘The Conscience of Huckleberry Finn’, in Peter Singer (ed.) Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 294–305.
Mark R. Wicclair (2000) ‘Conscientious Objection in Medicine’, Bioethics, 14(3) (July), pp. 205–27.
See in particular Raanan Gillon (1985) Philosophical Medical Ethics (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2005 Piers Benn
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Benn, P. (2005). The Role of Conscience in Medical Ethics. In: Athanassoulis, N. (eds) Philosophical Reflections on Medical Ethics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230273931_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230273931_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-24704-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-27393-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)