Skip to main content

The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries

  • Chapter
Policy Instruments for Sound Fiscal Policies

Part of the book series: Finance and Capital Markets Series ((FCMS))

Abstract

This chapter uses a new data set on budgetary institutions in Europe to examine the impact of fiscal rules and budget procedures in EU countries on public finances. It briefly describes the main pattern of budgetary institutions and their determinants across the EU-15 Member States. Empirical evidence for the time period 1985–2004 suggests that the centralization of budgeting procedures restrains public debt. In countries with one-party governments or coalition governments where parties are closely aligned and where political competition among them is low, this is achieved by the delegation of decision-making power to the minister of finance. Fiscal contracts that require countries to set multi-year targets and that reinforce those targets increase fiscal discipline in countries with ideologically dispersed coalitions and where parties regularly compete against each other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alesina, A., R. Hausman, R. Hommes and E. Stein (1995), ‘Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Latin America’, Inter-American Development Bank, Typescript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arreaza, A., B. Sorensen and O. Yosha (1999), ‘Consumption Smoothing through Fiscal Policy in OECD and EU Countries’, in J. Poterba and J. von Hagen (eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 59–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. (2005), Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, 3rd edition, San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I., H.-D. Klingemann, A. Volkens, J. Bara and T. Tanenbaum (2001), Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, W. R. and M. Hallerberg (2000), ‘Strategic Interaction between Monetary and Fiscal Actors under Full Capital Mobility’, American Political Science Review 94, 323–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Codogno, L., C. Bavero and A. Missale (2003), ‘Yield Spreads on EMU’, Economic Policy 37, 503–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J. and J.-E. Sturm (1994), ‘Political and Institutional Determinants of Fiscal Policy in the European Community’, Public Choice 80, 157–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haan, J., W. Moessen and B. Volkerink (1999), ‘Budgetary Procedures – Aspects and Changes: New Evidence for Some European Countries’, in J. Poterba and J. von Hagen (eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 265–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duverger, M. (1954), Political Parties: Their Organisation and Activity in the Modern State, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichengreen, B. and J. von Hagen (1995), ‘Fiscal Policy and Monetary Union: Federalism, Fiscal Restrictions and the No-bailout Rule’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1247, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Favero, C., F. Giavazzi and L. Spaventa (1997), ‘High Yields: The Spread on German Interest Rates’, Economic Journal 107, 956–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galí, J. and R. Perotti (2003), ‘Fiscal Policy and Monetary Integration in Europe’, Economic Policy 37, 534–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleich, H. (2003), ‘Budget Institutions and Fiscal Performance in Central and Eastern European Countries’, European Central Bank Working Paper No. 215, Frankfurt a M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M. (2004), Domestic Budgets in a United Europe: Fiscal Governance from the End of Bretton Woods to EMU, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M. and J. von Hagen (1998), ‘Electoral Institutions and the Budget Process’, in K. Fukasaku and R. Hausman (eds), Democracy, Decentralisation and Deficits in Latin America, Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M. and J. von Hagen (1999), ‘Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits within the European Union’, in J. Poterba and J. von Hagen (eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 209–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M., R. Strauch and J. von Hagen (2001), ‘The Use and Effectiveness of Budgetary Rules and Norms in EU Member States’, Report Prepared for the Dutch Ministry of Finance, July. Available for download at www.minfin.nl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M., R. Strauch and J. von Hagen (2004), ‘The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries’, European Central Bank Working Paper No. 419, Frankfurt a.M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, P. (1985), Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewiet, R. and K. Szakaly (1996), ‘Constitutional Limitations on Borrowing: An Analysis of State Bonded Indebtedness’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12, 62–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontopoulos, Y. and R. Perotti (1999), ‘Government Fragmentation and Fiscal Policy Outcomes: Evidence from OECD Countries’, in J. Poterba and J. von Hagen (eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 81–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadenichek Golder, S. (2005), ‘Pre-Electoral Coalitions in Comparative Perspective – A Test of Existing Hypotheses’, Electoral Studies 24, 643–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and G. Tabellini (2000), Political Economics – Explaining Economic Policy, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J. and J. von Hagen (eds) (1999), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1998), ‘Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?’, Journal of Political Economy 106, 997–1032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roubini, N. and J. Sachs (1989), ‘Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies’, European Economic Review 33, 903–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savage, J. (2005), Making the EMU: The Politics of Budgetary Surveillance and the Enforcement of Maastricht, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spolaore, E. (1993), ‘Macroeconomic Policy, Institutions, and Efficiency’, Dissertation, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauch, R. (1998), ‘Budgetprozesse und Haushaltsdisziplin – Eine Analyse der US-amerikanischen Staaten’, Dissertation, University of Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauch, R. and J. von Hagen (eds) (2000), Institutions, Politics and Fiscal Policy, Boston, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, R. and M. Soberg Shugart (1989), Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taagepera, R. and M. Soberg Shugart (1993), ‘Predicting the Number of Parties: A Quantitative Model of Duverger’s Mechanical Effect’, American Political Science Review 87, 455–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (2002), Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, A. (1999), ‘A Model of Endogenous Fiscal Deficits and Delayed Fiscal Reform’, in J. Poterba and J. von Hagen (eds), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 37–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkerink, B. and J. de Haan (2001), ‘Fragmented Government Effects on Fiscal Policy: New Evidence’, Public Choice 109, 221–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hagen, J. (1992), ‘Budgeting Procedures and Fiscal Performance in the European Communities’, Economic Papers 96 (whole issue), Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hagen, J. (2005), ‘Fiscal Rules and Fiscal Performance in the EU and Japan’, CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5330; November 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Hagen, J. and I. Harden (1994), ‘National Budget Processes and Fiscal Performance’, European Economy – Reports and Studies 3, 311–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, J. (2002), Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Joaquim Ayuso-i-Casals Servaas Deroose Elena Flores Laurent Moulin

Copyright information

© 2009 Mark Hallerberg, Rolf Strauch and Jürgen von Hagen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hallerberg, M., Strauch, R., von Hagen, J. (2009). The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries. In: Ayuso-i-Casals, J., Deroose, S., Flores, E., Moulin, L. (eds) Policy Instruments for Sound Fiscal Policies. Finance and Capital Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230271791_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics