Skip to main content

Fiscal Councils, Independent Forecasts and the Budgetary Process: Lessons from the Belgian Case

  • Chapter
Policy Instruments for Sound Fiscal Policies

Part of the book series: Finance and Capital Markets Series ((FCMS))

Abstract

At the end of the 1980s, large public deficits and increasing public debt-to-GDP ratios coupled with the regionalization of the state constrained Belgian authorities to establish institutions providing independent inputs, analyses and recommendations in the area of fiscal policy. Although this is difficult to assess empirically, these institutions have undoubtedly contributed to the successful consolidation process of Belgian public finances over the past 13 years. This chapter analyses the role of these so-called fiscal councils in the budgetary planning process and emphasizes the role played by the High Council of Finance in coordinating budgetary policy in a federal context and by the Federal Planning Bureau in producing independent, politically neutral short-term macroeconomic forecasts and medium-term projections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bethuyne, G. (2005), ‘Federalisation and Fiscal Consolidation: The Belgian Experience’, European Commission, ECFIN Country Focus 2(16), September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossier, F., I. Bracke, S. Gillis and F. Vanhorebeek (2004), ‘Une nouvelle version du modèle HERMES’, Working Paper 5-04, Federal Planning Bureau, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buti, M. (2006), ‘Will the New Stability and Growth Pact Succeed? An Economic and Political Perspective’, European Commission, Economic Papers, 241, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of the European Union (2005), ‘Presidency Conclusions’, 7619/1/05, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denis, C., D. Grenouilleau, K. McMorrow and W. Röger (2006), ‘Calculating Potential Growth Rates and Output Gaps – a Revised Production Function Approach’, European Economy, Economic Papers 247, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deroose, S. and S. Langedijk (2005), ‘Improving the Stability and Growth Pact: The Commission’s Three Pillar Approach’, European Commission, Occasional Papers, 15, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere, L. and B. Hertveldt (2004), ‘10 jaar Economische Begroting: Een terugblik op de kwaliteit van de vooruitzichten’, Federal Planning Bureau, Working Paper 13-04, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbelaere, L., B. Hertveldt, E. Hespel and I. Lebrun (2003), ‘De opmaak van de economische begroting: een handleiding’, Working Paper 17-03, Federal Planning Bureau, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Central Bank (2005), ‘The (Un)reliability of Output Gap in Real Time’, in Monthly Bulletin, 43–5, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004), ‘Strengthening Economic Governance and Clarifying the Implementation of the Stability and Growth Pact’, COM (2004) 581, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2006), ‘Public Finances in EMU 2006’, European Economy, 3/2006, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1966), ‘The Methodology of Positive Economics’, in Essays in Positive Economics, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutierrez, M.-I. and J. Vuchelen (2002), ‘The Quality of a Consensus Forecast for Economic Growth in Belgium, 1981–2000’, Cahiers économiques de Bruxelles 45(1), 67–90, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg, M., R. Strauch and J. von Hagen (2001), ‘The Use and Effectiveness of Budgetary Rules and Norms in EU Member States’, Report Prepared for the Dutch Ministry of Finance, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallerberg M., R. Strauch and J. von Hagen (2004), ‘Budgetary Forecasts in Europe – the Track Record of Stability and Convergence Programmes’, ECB, Working Paper, 307, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, F. (2005), ‘Planning or Propaganda? An Evaluation of Germany’s Medium-Term Budgetary Planning’, Discussion Paper No. 05–12, ZEW, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertveldt, B. and I. Lebrun (2003), ‘MODTRIM II: A Quarterly Model for the Belgian Economy’, Working Paper 6–03, Federal Planning Bureau, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund (2005), ‘Promoting Fiscal Discipline: Is There a Role for Fiscal Agencies?’, Board Paper, Fiscal Affairs Department, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonung, L. and M. Larch (2006), ‘Improving Fiscal Policy in the EU. The Case for Independent Forecasts’, Economic Policy (47): 491–534, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes, J. N. (1891), The Scope and Method of Political Economy, Kitchener: Batoche Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranendonk, H. and J. Verbruggen (2006), ‘Trefzekerheid van korte-termijnramingen en middellange-termijnverkenningen’, CPB Document No 131, Centraal Planbureau, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larch, M. and M. Salto (2005), ‘Fiscal Rules, Inertia and Discretionary Fiscal Policy’, Applied Economics 37: 1135–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebrun, I. (2005), ‘Why Is Belgian Productivity Growth Declining?’, in The Economic Outlook in Europe, European Economic Network, Summer Report, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milesi-Ferretti, G. M. and K. Moriyama (2004), ‘Fiscal Adjustment in EU Countries: A Balance Sheet Approach’, Working Paper 143, International Monetary Fund, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulin, L. and P. Wierts (2006), ‘How Credible Are Multiannual Budgetary Plans in the EU?’, paper presented at 8th INFER Annual Conference, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orphanides, A. and S. van Norden (2002), ‘The Unreliability of Output-gap Estimates in Real Time’, The Review of Economics and Statistics 4: 569–83, November.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poterba, J. and J. von Hagen (eds) (1999), Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Rompuy, P. (2005), ‘De coördinatie van het budgettair beleid in België: een evaluatie’, Bulletin de Documentation No 1, Service d’Etudes et de Documentation, SPF Finances, 299–317, January.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Joaquim Ayuso-i-Casals Servaas Deroose Elena Flores Laurent Moulin

Copyright information

© 2009 Igor Lebrun

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lebrun, I. (2009). Fiscal Councils, Independent Forecasts and the Budgetary Process: Lessons from the Belgian Case. In: Ayuso-i-Casals, J., Deroose, S., Flores, E., Moulin, L. (eds) Policy Instruments for Sound Fiscal Policies. Finance and Capital Markets Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230271791_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics