Abstract
The current financial crisis is comparable to a pandemic (an epidemic which has spread to the entire world). Diamond and Rajan warned that local bank failures could lead to a “contagion” (domino effect or knock-on defaults) and financial crisis showing astonishing resemblances to disease propagating like an epidemic.1 Both disease contagions and financial contagions are induced by one or a limited number of “infected” entities.2 In the case of disease contagions, the infected entity is an individual incubating a micro-organism (e.g., a virus or bacteria) who eventually spreads the infection to the community the individual is connected to. The entity, in the case of financial crisis, is a financial institution committing fraud, internal irregularities or facing losses due to risky loans and investments.3 The consequences of either an infectious disease pandemic or a financial crisis are dramatic, the former potentially leading to millions of deaths. The flu pandemic in 1918 was estimated to have killed between 50 and 100 million people in about six months, while the latter eventually resulted in millions of ruined shareholders and job losses.4 An additional consequence of both disease and financial epidemics is that the remaining sensitive individuals (non-infected) become suspicious toward other individuals, considering them as infected and refusing to enter relationships with them. Allen and Gale focused their work on claim emissions that occurred against suspected institutions or regions, with the consequence of value loss of this claim, potentially leading to contagion.5
Chapter PDF
Notes
Diamond and Rajan (2005), “Liquidity Shortage and Financial Crisis,” The Journal of Finance, 60, pp. 615–46.
Kanas (2005), “Pure Contagion Effects in International Banking: The Case of BCCI’s Failure,” Journal of Applied Economics, 8, pp. 101–23.
Aharony and Swary (1983), “Contagion Effects of Bank Failures: Evidence from Capital Markets,” Journal of Business, 56, pp. 305–22.
Barry (2006), “What the 1918 Flu Pandemic Teaches Us: Yesterday’s Lessons Inform Today’s Preparedness,” MLO, September issue, pp. 26–8.
Allen and Gale (2000), “Financial Contagion,” Journal of Political Economy, 108, pp. 1–33.
Fock et al. (2002), “Influenza Pandemic: Preparedness Planning in Germany,” Euro Surveillance, 7, pp. 1–5.
Aull et al. (2007), “A Novel Influenza Surveillance System: Outcomes from the 2005–2006 Flu Season,” Southern Medical Journal, 100, pp. 873–80.
Trigueiros and Taffler (1996), “Neural Networks and Empirical Research in Accounting,” Accounting and Business Research, 26, pp. 347–356.
Weber & Menoud (2007), “Systemic Risk as a Topic of Financial Conglomerates’ Financial Supervision,” Banking and Financial Law Review, 22, pp. 377–403.
McDonald (1952), “The Analysis of Equilibrium in Malaria,” Tropical Diseases Bulletin, 49, pp. 813–29.
Pearl, J. (1985), “Bayesian Networks: A Model of Self-Activated Memory for Evidential Reasoning,” Proceedings of the 7th Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, University of California, Irvine, CA, pp. 329–34.
Allen and Gale (2000), “Financial Contagion,” Journal of Political Economy, 108, pp. 1–33.
Nier et al. (2008), “Network Models and Financial Stability,” working paper no. 346, Quarterly Bulletin Q2. pp. 184–93.
Jobst (2007), “The Treatment of Operational Risk under the New Basel Framework: Critical Issues,” Journal of banking regulation, 4, pp. 316–52. There are currently three types of FI supervision: the prudential supervision which observes the solvency and the business supervision which monitors the way FI manage their businesses and aim to ensure ethical and legal practices. The solvency supervision is currently performed on an institutional basis. A third type of supervision aims at maintaining an overall stability. Basel II aims at a more macroprudential approach.
Borio (2003), “Toward a Macroprudential Framework for Financial Supervision and Regulation?” CESifo Economic Studies, 49, pp. 181–205.
Mitchener (2005), “Bank Supervision, Regulation and Instability During the Great Depression,” The Journal of Economic History, 65, pp. 152–85.
Butkiewicz (2004), “Prudential Supervision: What Works and What Doesn’t,” Eastern Economic Journal, 30: 141.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Christian Viladent
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Viladent, C. (2009). An Epidemiologic Approach of Financial Markets. In: Hieronymi, O. (eds) Globalization and the Reform of the International Banking and Monetary System. Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230251069_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230251069_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31388-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25106-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)