Skip to main content
  • 75 Accesses

Abstract

The image of Shelley as a poet unconcerned with contemporary fame maintains a remarkable tenacity, such that his popular image might still be summed up by the description of him in Edward Trelawny’s 1878 Records of Shelley, Byron and the Author: “Whilst he lived, his works fell still-born from the press; he never complained of the world’s neglect, or expressed any other feeling than surprise at the rancorous abuse wasted on an author who had no readers.” Trelawny’s description in essence, of course, describes a claim to celebrity—a celebrity Shelley maintains despite, or even because of, his lack of readers, and a celebrity Trelawny hoped would sell copies of his memoir. Trelawny indeed continues his account of Shelley’s indifference to fame by quoting a telling conversation with the poet: “‘But for the reviewers,’ he said, laughing, ‘I should be entirely unknown.’ ‘But for them,’ I observed, ‘Williams and I would never have crossed the Alps in chase of you. Our curiosity as sportsmen was excited to see and have a shot at so strange a monster as they represented you to be.’”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Edward Trelawny, Records of Shelley, Byron and the Author (1878) (New York: New York Review of Books, 2000), p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Stephen Behrendt, Shelley and His Audiences (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1989)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Susan Wolfson, Formal Charges: The Shaping of Poetic Form in British Romanticism (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997), pp. 193–226

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kim Wheatley, Shelley and His Readers: Beyond Paranoid Politics (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  5. P.B. Shelley, Preface to Prometheus Unbound, in Reiman and Powers, ed., Shelley’s Poetry and Prose, p. 135. Readers often see The Cenci as one step in a dialectic of ideas about morality and tyranny that extends over Shelley’s career; in this sense, it is often read as a response to or modification of Prometheus Unbound. A dialectical schema underlies the discussions of the play by Earl Wasserman and Jerrold Hogle. See Wasserman’s Shelley: A Critical Reading (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1971), pp. 84–130

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hogle’s Shelley’s Process: Radical Transference and the Development of His Major Works (New York: Oxford UP, 1988), pp. 147–62.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stuart Curran, Shelley’s Cenci: Scorpions Ringed with Fire (Princeton: Princeton UP, 1970)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Julie Carlson, In the Theater of Romanticism: Coleridge, Nationalism, Women (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1994)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Stuart Sperry, Shelley’s Major Verse: The Narrative and Dramatic Poetry (Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Percy B. Shelley, The Cenci: A Tragedy in Five Acts (Italy: Printed for C. and J. Ollier, London, 1819).

    Google Scholar 

  11. See Mary Jacobus, Reading Woman: Essays in Feminist Criticism (New York: Columbia UP, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. William Jewett, Fatal Autonomy: Romantic Drama and the Rhetoric of Agency (Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP, 1997), p. 151.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mary Shelley, Matilda in Mary Shelley and Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary, Maria, Matilda, ed. Janet Todd (New York: Penguin, 1992), p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  14. For discussions of Beatrice as a performer, see Carlson, pp. 181–98 and Andrea Henderson, Romantic Identities: Varieties of Subjectivity 1774–1830 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1996), pp. 96–129.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Peter Brooks, “The Revolutionary Body,” in Fictions of the French Revolution, ed. Bernadette Fort (Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1991), pp. 35–54

    Google Scholar 

  16. Barbara Groseclose, “The Incest Motif in Shelley’s The Cenci,” Comparative Drama. 19 (Fall 1985) 222–39

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Eric Eisner

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Eisner, E. (2009). The Cenci’s Celebrity. In: Nineteenth-Century Poetry and Literary Celebrity. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250840_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics