Skip to main content

Abstract

Around four years ago I began to work on the effects of the World Trade Organization (WTO) and its predecessor the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT).1 I was interested in quantifying the effects of membership in these multilateral trade organizations on international trade. I fully expected to find a large positive effect and was primarily interested in comparing this to the effects of other things that enhanced trade (particularly the effects of currency unions). However, I was astonished to find that a naïve look at the data yielded little evidence that membership of GATT/the WTO had an effect on trade that was either economically or statistically substantive. In this chapter, I review the small literature that has developed around this issue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bagwell, Kyle, and Robert Staiger. 2003. The Economics of the World Trading System. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dam, Kenneth W. 1970. The GATT: Law and International Economic Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drabek, Zdenek, and Marc Bacchetta. 2004. “Tracing the Effects of WTO Accession on Policy-Making in Sovereign States: Preliminary Lessons from the Recent Experience of Transition Countries.” World Economy 27(7): 1083–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenett, Simon J. 2005. “What is Known about the Effects of WTO Accession on Developing Countries?” Unpublished, Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenett, Simon J., and Jonathan Gage. 2005. “Evaluating WTO Accessions.” Unpublished, Oxford University reprinted as Chapter 4 in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evenett, Simon J., Jonathan Gage, and Maxine Kennett. 2004. “WTO Membership and Market Access.” Unpublished, Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felbermayr, Gabriel J., and Wilhelm Kohler. 2005. “Exploring the Intensive and Extensive Margins of World Trade.” Unpublished, Tübingen University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrantino, Michael J. 2006. “Policy Anchors: Do Free Trade Agreements Serve as Vehicles for Developing Country Policy Reform?” Unpublished, USITC, reprinted as Chapter 5 in this volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowa, Joanne, and Soo Yeong Kim. 2006. “An Exclusive Country Club: The Effects of the GATT on Trade, 1950–94.” Unpublished, Princeton University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, Elhanan, Marc Melitz, and Yona Rubinstein. 2005. “Trading Partners and Trading Volumes.” Unpublished, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Anne. (Ed.) 1998. The WTO as an International Organization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, Peter T. 2005. “How Important is State Enforcement for Trade?” Unpublished, George Mason University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, David D., and Changqi Wu. 2004. “GATT/WTO Accession and Productivity.” In Takatoshi Ito and Andrew Rose (Eds.). Growth and Productivity in East Asia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xuepeng. 2006. “GATT/WTO Promotes Trade Strongly: Solving the Sample Selection Bias.” Unpublished, Syracuse University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piermartini, Roberta, and Robert Teh. 2005. “Demystifying Modelling Methods for Trade Policy.” WTO Discussion Paper No. 10: Geneva: WTO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. 2004a. “Do We Really Know that the WTO Increases Trade?” American Economic Review (Mar.) 94(1): 98–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. 2004b. “Do WTO Members have More Liberal Trade Policy?” Journal of International Economics (Jul.) 63(2): 209–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. 2004c. “Response to Subramanian and Wei.” Unpublished, UC Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. 2005a. “Does the WTO Make Trade More Stable?” Open Economies Review (Jan.) 16(1): 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. 2005b. “Response to Tomz, Goldstein, and Rivers.” Unpublished, UC Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Andrew K. 2005c. “Which International Institutions Promote International Trade?” Review of International Economics (Sep.) 13(4): 682–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schott, Jeffrey J. (Ed.) 2004. Free Trade Agreements: US Strategies and Priorities. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, Arvind, and Shang-Jin Wei. 2006. “The WTO Promotes Trade, Strongly but Unevenly.” Unpublished, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Man-Keung and Shang-Jin Wei. 2006. “Is Bitter Medicine Good for You? The Economic Consequences of WTO/GATT Accessions” Unpublished, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomz, Michael, Judith Goldstein, and Douglas Rivers. 2005. “Membership has its Privileges: The Impact of GATT on International Trade.” Unpublished, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Andrew K. Rose

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, A.K. (2010). The Effect of Membership in the GATT/WTO on Trade: Where Do We Stand?. In: Drabek, Z. (eds) Is the World Trade Organization Attractive Enough for Emerging Economies?. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250826_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics