Abstract
While attention on the role of institutions in the economy has increasingly permeated the communication of economists in recent years, the positivist inclination has not. Discussions of the concept of institutions have thus been informed by ideas from either Newtonian physics or from biology (Hodgson and Knudsen 2006; special issues of the Journal of Evolutionary Economics 2006 and the Journal of Economic Methodology 2004). Is the biological metaphor the proper one for evolutionary economics to pursue, given that it leads to the incorporation of more from biology as an academic discipline than would be called for? Is the economy, the subject of analysis for economists, not fundamentally different from a biological or a natural system? I argue that social systems are different from physical ones and that such an acknowledgement has consequences of a theoretical nature (compare Leydesdorff 2006a, 2006b).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsCopyright information
© 2009 Wilfred Dolfsma
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dolfsma, W. (2009). Conclusions. In: Institutions, Communication and Values. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250666_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230250666_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30876-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-25066-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)