Abstract
All direct democratic political institutions, which we will subsume under the term referendums in what follows, have the common feature that they in some sense allow the voters to make decisions ‘directly’, bypassing other political structures, channels and processes — in short, bypassing representative democracy. Taking in the consequences of this, one has to admit that referendums can be a very powerful tool. Nevertheless, referendums form a set of political institutions that are usually associated with only a small handful of countries, Switzerland and certain US states such as California being among the most frequently mentioned in this context. In reality, however, many more countries possess institutions allowing for referendums. In this context it is notable, too, that the wave of democratization in Europe in the last 15–20 years involved the writing of new constitutions foreseeing referendums as part of the new political set-up.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, A. (ed.) (2000) Political Money: Deregulating American Politics (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institute Press).
Benoit, K. and M. Marsh (2004) ‘Campaign Spending in the Local Government Elections of 1999’, Irish Political Studies, 18(2): 1–22.
Besley, T. and A. Case (2003) ‘Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States’, Journal of Economic Literature, 41(1): 7–74.
Broder, D. (2000) Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money (New York: James H. Silberman Book/Harcourt).
Camobreco, J.F (1998) ‘Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process’, Journal of Politics, 60(August 3): 819–29.
Carty, R.K. and M. Eagles (1999) ‘Do Local Campaigns Matter? Campaign Spending, the Local Canvass and Party Support in Canada’, Electoral Studies, 18(1): 69–87.
Clawson, D., M. Weiler and A. Neustadtl (1998) Dollars and Votes: How Business Campaign Contributions Subvert Democracy (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).
Donovan, T. and S. Bowler (1998) ‘Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An Extension’, American Journal of Political Science, 42(3): 1020–4.
Erikson, R. and T.R. Palfrey (1998) ‘Campaign Spending and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equation Approach’, Journal of Politics, 60 (May): 355–73.
Erikson, R. and T.R. Palfrey (2000) ‘Equilibria in Campaign Spending Games: Theory and Data’, American Political Science Review, 94(3): 595–609.
Fischer, J. (2005) The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society. Dissertation of the University of St Gallen (Bamberg: Difo-Druck GmbH).
Fisher, J. (1999) ‘Party Expenditure and Electoral Prospects: A National Level Analysis of Britain’, Electoral Studies, 18(4): 519–32.
Frey, B.S. and L. Gotte (1998) ‘Does the Popular Vote Destroy Civil Rights?’, American Journal of Political Science, 42(4): 1343–8.
Gamble, B.S. (1997) ‘Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote’, American Journal of Political Science, 41(1): 245–69.
Gerber, E. (1996) ‘Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives’, American Journal of Political Science, 40(1): 99–128.
Hertig, H.P. (1982) ‘Sind Abstimmungserlolge Käuflich? — Elemente der Meinungsbildungbei Eidgenössischen Abstimmungen’, Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique, 22(1): 35–58.
Kirchgässner, Gebhard, Lars Feld and Marcel R. Savioz (1999) Die Direkte Demokratie der Schweiz: Modern, erfolgreich, Entwicklungs-und Exportfähig (Basel: Helbing und Lichtenhahn).
Matsusaka, J.G. (2004) For the Many or the Few: How the Initiative Process Changes American Government (Chicago: Chicago University Press).
Smith, D. (1998) Tax Crusaders and the Politics of Direct Democracy (New York: Routledge).
Vatter, A. and C. Rüefli (2003) ‘Do Political Factors Matter for Health Care Expenditure?’, Journal of Public Policy, 23(3): 325–47.
West, D. (2000) Checkbook Democracy: How Money Corrupts Political Campaigns (Boston: Northeastern University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2010 Karin Gilland Lutz and Simon Hug
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lutz, K.G., Hug, S. (2010). Introduction. In: Lutz, K.G., Hug, S. (eds) Financing Referendum Campaigns. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248656_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248656_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36798-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24865-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)