Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

All direct democratic political institutions, which we will subsume under the term referendums in what follows, have the common feature that they in some sense allow the voters to make decisions ‘directly’, bypassing other political structures, channels and processes — in short, bypassing representative democracy. Taking in the consequences of this, one has to admit that referendums can be a very powerful tool. Nevertheless, referendums form a set of political institutions that are usually associated with only a small handful of countries, Switzerland and certain US states such as California being among the most frequently mentioned in this context. In reality, however, many more countries possess institutions allowing for referendums. In this context it is notable, too, that the wave of democratization in Europe in the last 15–20 years involved the writing of new constitutions foreseeing referendums as part of the new political set-up.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, A. (ed.) (2000) Political Money: Deregulating American Politics (Stanford, CA: Hoover Institute Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benoit, K. and M. Marsh (2004) ‘Campaign Spending in the Local Government Elections of 1999’, Irish Political Studies, 18(2): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T. and A. Case (2003) ‘Political Institutions and Policy Choices: Evidence from the United States’, Journal of Economic Literature, 41(1): 7–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broder, D. (2000) Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money (New York: James H. Silberman Book/Harcourt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camobreco, J.F (1998) ‘Preferences, Fiscal Policies, and the Initiative Process’, Journal of Politics, 60(August 3): 819–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carty, R.K. and M. Eagles (1999) ‘Do Local Campaigns Matter? Campaign Spending, the Local Canvass and Party Support in Canada’, Electoral Studies, 18(1): 69–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D., M. Weiler and A. Neustadtl (1998) Dollars and Votes: How Business Campaign Contributions Subvert Democracy (Philadelphia: Temple University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, T. and S. Bowler (1998) ‘Direct Democracy and Minority Rights: An Extension’, American Journal of Political Science, 42(3): 1020–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. and T.R. Palfrey (1998) ‘Campaign Spending and Incumbency: An Alternative Simultaneous Equation Approach’, Journal of Politics, 60 (May): 355–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R. and T.R. Palfrey (2000) ‘Equilibria in Campaign Spending Games: Theory and Data’, American Political Science Review, 94(3): 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. (2005) The Impact of Direct Democracy on Society. Dissertation of the University of St Gallen (Bamberg: Difo-Druck GmbH).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, J. (1999) ‘Party Expenditure and Electoral Prospects: A National Level Analysis of Britain’, Electoral Studies, 18(4): 519–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and L. Gotte (1998) ‘Does the Popular Vote Destroy Civil Rights?’, American Journal of Political Science, 42(4): 1343–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamble, B.S. (1997) ‘Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote’, American Journal of Political Science, 41(1): 245–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, E. (1996) ‘Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives’, American Journal of Political Science, 40(1): 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertig, H.P. (1982) ‘Sind Abstimmungserlolge Käuflich? — Elemente der Meinungsbildungbei Eidgenössischen Abstimmungen’, Annuaire Suisse de Science Politique, 22(1): 35–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirchgässner, Gebhard, Lars Feld and Marcel R. Savioz (1999) Die Direkte Demokratie der Schweiz: Modern, erfolgreich, Entwicklungs-und Exportfähig (Basel: Helbing und Lichtenhahn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsusaka, J.G. (2004) For the Many or the Few: How the Initiative Process Changes American Government (Chicago: Chicago University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. (1998) Tax Crusaders and the Politics of Direct Democracy (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatter, A. and C. Rüefli (2003) ‘Do Political Factors Matter for Health Care Expenditure?’, Journal of Public Policy, 23(3): 325–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, D. (2000) Checkbook Democracy: How Money Corrupts Political Campaigns (Boston: Northeastern University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Karin Gilland Lutz and Simon Hug

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lutz, K.G., Hug, S. (2010). Introduction. In: Lutz, K.G., Hug, S. (eds) Financing Referendum Campaigns. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248656_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics