Innovation as Objective: The SFINNO Approach

  • Robert van der Have
  • Jani Saarinen
  • Pekka Pesonen
  • Nina Rilla


Research on innovations and innovative activity has been applying different sources of information to help in understanding the phenomenon and to investigate various research questions related to it. As the field of innovation studies is quite broad, incorporating various research topics which, in addition, can be approached from various perspectives, there cannot be one source of data superior to all others. Rather the different databases and information repositories offer diverse data, and thus are often taken as complementing rather than substituting each other. Most commonly used information sources include, for instance, patent databases and patent citation databases, innovation and R&D surveys, as well as R&D expenditure statistics. In the chapters of this book, the main source of innovation data has been the database of Finnish innovations, namely SFINNO. The database is developed, constructed and maintained by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland.


Large Firm Innovation Data Innovation Output Object Approach Innovation Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acs, Z. and Audretsch D. (1990) Innovation and Small Firms, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. and Audretsch, D. (1993) ‘Analysing Innovation Output Indicators: The US Experience’, in A. Kleinknecht and D. Bain (eds), New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z., Anselin, L. and Varga, A. (2002) ‘Patents and Innovation Counts as Measures of Regional Production of New Knowledge’, Research Policy, Vol. 31, 1069–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M. (1996) ‘Measuring Technological Change Through Patents and Innovation Surveys’, Technovation, Vol. 16, No. 9, 451–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, K. L. and Gordon, T. J. (1984) Characterisation of Innovation Introduced to the US Market, Report to the US Small Business Administration, Glastonbury: Futures Group.Google Scholar
  6. Kleinknecht, A. and Bain, D. (eds) (1993) New Concepts in Innovation Output Measurement, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Leppälahti, A. (2000) ‘Comparison of the Finnish Innovation Surveys’, Science Technology and Research2000, 1, Helsinki: Statistics Finland.Google Scholar
  8. Mäkinen, I. (2007) ‘To Patent or Not to Patent? An Innovation-level Investigation of the Propensity to Patent’, VTT Publications 646, Espoo: VTT.Google Scholar
  9. OECD (1997) Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data: ‘The Oslo Manual’, Paris: OECD and Eurostat.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Palmberg, C., Leppälahti, A., Lemola, T. and Toivanen, H. (1999) ‘Towards a Better Understanding of Innovation and Industrial Renewal in Finland: A New Perspective’, VTT — Technical Research Centre of Finland, Working paper 41/99, Espoo: VTT.Google Scholar
  11. Palrnberg, C., Niininen, P., Toivanen, H. and Wahlberg, T. (2000), ‘Industrial Innovation in Finland’, VTT Group for Technology Studies, Working Papers No. 47/00, Espoo: VTT.Google Scholar
  12. Pavitt, K. (1984) ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy, Vol. 13, 343–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Saarinen, J. (2005) ‘Innovations and Industrial Performance in Finland 1945–98’, Lund Studies in Economic History, Vol. 34, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Robert van der Have, Jani Saarinen, Pekka Pesonen and Nina Rilla 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert van der Have
  • Jani Saarinen
  • Pekka Pesonen
  • Nina Rilla

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations