Abstract
Environmental philosophers have had a great deal to say about nature as it has been conceived by scientists. They have had much to say about nature as it has been conceived by other philosophers. But they have had comparatively little to say about nature as we experience it in the living of our lives. In the following, I argue that this lack of attention to nature-as-experienced is a cause for regret, and not just for rhetorical reasons, not just because it makes the discipline of environmental philosophy seem disagreeably abstract and high-flown. I contend that this inattention to experience is a bad thing because environmental philosophy that fails to connect with our lived experience of nature is, more often than not, bad philosophy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Simon P. James
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
James, S.P. (2009). Introduction. In: The Presence of Nature. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248526_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248526_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30792-0
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24852-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)