Skip to main content

Rudeness and Incivility in the Workplace

  • Chapter
Friends and Enemies in Organizations

Abstract

Incivility may be defined as low intensity deviant behaviour that violates workplace norms for mutual respect. The effects of intra-organizational incivility are considerable, and resolving conflicts among co-workers can account for much of managers’ time. This chapter details the nature of incivility and its consequences. The chapter provides keys to recognizing and dealing with habitual instigators and offers remedies that are being used effectively by organizations to curtail and correct employee-toemployee incivility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alberts, J. K., Lutgen-Sandvik, P. & Tracy, S. J. (2005, May). Workplace bullying: A case of escalated incivility. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, L. M. & Pearson, C. M. (1999). Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace. Academy of Management Review, 24, 452–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, S. & Roy-Girard, D. (2007). Toxins in the workplace: Affect [sic] on organizations and employees. Corporate Governance, 7(1), 17–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, R. C. (1986). Communication and Community: Implications of Martin Buber’s Dialogue. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amett, R. C. (2001). Dialogic civility as pragmatic ethical praxis: An interpersonal metaphor for the public domain. Communication Theory, 11, 315–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, R. C. (2006). Professional civility. In J. M. H. Fritz & B. L. Omdahl (eds), Problematic Relationships in the Workplace (pp. 233–248). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, R. C. (2007). Hannah Arendt: Dialectical communicative labor. In P. Arneson (ed.), Perspectives on Philosophy of Communication (pp. 67–84). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, R. C. & Arneson, P. (1999). Dialogic Civility in a Cynical Age: Community, Hope, and Interpersonal Relationships. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, R. C. & Fritz, J. M. H. (2001). Communication and professional civility as a basic service course: Dialogic praxis between departments and situated in an academic home. Basic Communication Course Annual, 13, 174–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, R. C. & Fritz, J. M. H. (2003). Sustaining institutional ethics and integrity: Management in a postmodern moment. In A. S. Iltis (ed.), Institutional Integrity in Healthcare (pp. 41–71). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, R. C., Fritz, J. M. H. & Bell, L. M. (2009). Communication Ethics Literacy: Dialogue and Difference. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandow, D. & Hunter, D. (2008). Developing policies about uncivil workplace behaviour. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 103–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. & Neuman, J. H. (1996). Workplace violence and workplace aggression: Evidence on their relative frequency and potential causes. Aggressive Behaviour, 22, 161–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. & Neuman, J. H. (1998). Workplace aggression – The iceberg beneath the tip of workplace violence: Evidence on its forms, frequency and targets. Public Administration Quarterly, 21, 446–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R., Madsen, H., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A. & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J. & Tripp, T. M. (2005). The study of revenge in the workplace: Conceptual, ideological, and empirical issues. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (eds), Counter-productive Workplace Behaviour: Investigations of Actors and Targets (pp. 65–81). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, G. & Andersson, L. (2005). Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 78, 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhler, P. (2003). Managing in a new millennium. Supervision, 64(4), 20–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. L. (1998). Civility: Manners, Morals, and the Etiquette of Democracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cortina, L., Magley, V., Williams, J. & Langhout, R. (2001). Incivility in the workplace: Incidence and impact. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 64–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cupach, W. R., Huggins, J., Long, L. W. & Metts, S. (2002, March). Perceptions of impropriety: Role of embarrassability and perceiver sex. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association, Long Beach, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cupach, W. R. and Spitzberg, B. H. (eds) (1994). The Dark Side of Interpersonal Communication. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darr, C. R. (2005). Civility as rhetorical enactment: The John Ashcroft ‘debates’ and Burke’s theory of form. Southern Communication Journal, 70, 316–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLongis, A., Folkman, S. & Lazarus, R. S. (1988). The impact of daily stress on health and mood: Psychological and social resources as mediators. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 486–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M. A., Drasgow, F. & Munson, L. J. (1998). The perceptions of fair interpersonal treatment scale: Development and validation of a measure of interpersonal treatment in the workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 683–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. K., Ganster, D. C. & Pagon, M. (2002). Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 331–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, S. & Spector, P. E. (eds) (2005). Counter-Productive Work Behaviour: Investigations of Actors and Targets. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. M. H. (2002). How do I dislike thee? Let me count the ways: Constructing impressions of troublesome others at work. Management Communication Quarterly, 15, 410–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. M. H. (2006). Typology of troublesome others at work: A follow-up investigation. In J. M. H. Fritz & B. L. Omdahl (eds), Problematic Relationships in the Workplace (pp. 21–46). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. M. H. & Arnett, R. C. (2003, April). Organizational mission, ‘spirit,’ and organizational technology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. M. H. & Arnett, R. C. (2007, November). Professional civility as communicative and rhetorical practice in organizations: Social style grounded in substance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. M. H., Arnett, R. C. & Conkel, M. (1999). Organizational ethical standards and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 20, 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, J. M. H. & Omdahl, B. (eds) (2006). Problematic Relationships in the Workplace. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonthier, G. (2002). Rude Awakenings: Overcoming the Civility Crisis in the Workplace. Chicago: Dearborn Trade.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottman, J. (1994). Why marriages fail. Family Therapy Networker, 18(3), 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, R. W. & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (eds) (2004). The Dark Side of Organizational Behaviour. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurstein, R. (1996). The Repeal of Reticence: A History ofAmerica’s Cultural and Legal Struggles Over Free Speech, Obscenity, Sexual Liberation, and Modern Art. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzley, R. M. (1992). Organizational climate and communication climate: Predicators of commitment to the organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 5, 379–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinemann, R. L. (1996). Campus-wide communication incivility in the basic course: A case study. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 404 701).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J. A. (2006). Distancing from problematic co-workers. In J. M. H. Fritz & B. L. Omdahl (eds), Problematic Relationships in the Workplace (pp. 205–232). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, R. (2002). Management citizenship behaviour and its consequences. Work and Occupations, 29, 64–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, S. A. (2006). Workplace incivility: State of the science. Journal of Nursing Administration, 36, 22–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. & Indvik, J. (2001a). Rudeness at work: Impulse over restraint. Public Personnel Management, 30, 457–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. K. & lndvik, J. (2001b). Slings and arrows of rudeness: Incivility in the workplace. Journal of Management Development, 20, 705–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, K. & Montgomery, K. (1998). A framework for understanding dysempowerment in organizations. Human Resource Management, 37, 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimura, H. (2003). Overcome toxic management. Nursing Management, 34, 26–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lievrouw, L. A. & Finn, T. A. (1996). New information technologies and informality: Comparing organizational information flows using the CSM. International Journal of Technology Management, 11, 28–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S. & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 483–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. J. & Hine, D. W. (2005). Development and validation of a measure of the uncivil workplace behaviour questionnaire. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 477–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metts, S., Cupach, W. & Lippert, L. (2006). Forgiveness in the workplace. In J. M. H. Fritz & Omdahl, B. L. (eds), Problematic Relationships in the Workplace (pp. 249–274). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. S. (2001). Breaches of propriety. In R. Kowalski (ed.), Behaving Badly: Aversive Behaviours in Interpersonal Relationships (pp. 29–58). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, K., Kane, K. & Vance, C. M. (2004). Accounting for differences in norms of respect: A study of assessments of incivility through the lenses of race and gender. Group and Organization Management, 29, 248–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, A. M., Duffy, M. K. & Griffin, R. W. (2000). Construct confusion in the study of anti-social work behaviour. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 18, 275–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omdahl, B. L. (2006). Towards effective work relationships. In J. M. H. Fritz & B. L. Omdahl (eds), Problematic Relationships in the Workplace (pp. 279–294). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C., Andersson, L. & Porath, C. (2000). Assessing and attacking workplace incivility. Organizational Dynamics, 29, 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C., Andersson, L. & Wegner, J. (2001). When workers flout convention: A study of workplace incivility. Human Relations, 54, 1387–1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C., Andersson, L. & Porath, C. (2005). Workplace incivility. In S. Fox & P. E. Spector (eds), Counter-Productive Workplace Behaviour: Investigations of Actors and Targets (pp. 177–200). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M. & Porath, C. L. (2004). On incivility, its impact, and directions for future research. In R. W. Griffin & A. M. O’Leary-Kelly (eds), The Dark Side of Organizational behaviour (pp. 403–425). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, C. M. & Porath, C. L. (2005). On the nature, consequences, and remedies of workplace incivility: No time for ‘nice’? Think again. Academy of Management Executive, 19, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penney, L. M. & Spector, P. E. (2005). Job stress, incivility, and counter-productive work behaviour (CWB): The moderating role of negative affectivity. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26, 777–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L., Overbeck, J. R. & Pearson, C. M. (2008). Picking up the gauntlet: How individuals respond to status challenges. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1945–1980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L. & Pearson, C. M. (2000, August). Gender differences and the behavior of targets of workplace incivility: He ‘dukes’ it out, she ‘disappears’ herself. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Management, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porath, C. L. & Erez, A. (2007). Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1181–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins, W. K. (1985). Stalking interpersonal communication effectiveness: Social, individual or situational integration? In T. W. Benson (ed.), Speech Communication in the Twentieth Century (pp. 109–129). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarlicki, D. P. & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, T. (2002). Behavioural integrity: The perceived alignment between managers’ words and deeds as a research focus. Organization Science, 13, 18–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzberg, B. H. & Cupach, W. R. (eds) (1998). The Dark Side of Close Relationships. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, R. (2007). The No Asshole Rule. New York: Warner Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sypher, B. D. (2004). Reclaiming civil discourse in the workplace. Southern Communication Journal, 69, 257–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau, S., Crossley, C., Bennett, R. J. & Sczesny, S. (2007). The relationship between trust, attachment, and anti-social work behaviours. Human Relations, 60, 1155–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, S. J., Lutgen-Sandvik, P. & Alberts, J. K. (2006). Nightmares, demons, and slaves: Exploring the painful metaphors of workplace bullying. Management Communication Quarterly, 20, 148–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, K. & Tracy, S. J. (1998). Rudeness at 911:Re-conceptualizing face and faceattack. Human Communication Research, 25, 225–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troester, R. L. & Mester, C. S. (2007). Civility in Business and Professional Communication. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y. & Weitz, E. (2004). Misbehaviour in Organizations. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, M. H. (2006). Writing what’s relevant: Workplace incivility in public administration – A wolf in sheep’s clothing. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 28, 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E. & Austin, J. T. (2000). Cynicism about organizational change. Group and Organization Management, 25, 132–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Beavin, J. H. & Jackson, D. D. (1967). Pragmatics of Human Communication: A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies, and Paradoxes. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, A. M. & Duck, S. (2001). You ****!: Swearing as an aversive and a relational activity. In R. Kowalski (ed.), Behaving Badly: Aversive Behaviours in Interpersonal Relationships (pp. 59–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zauderer, D. (2002). Workplace incivility and the management of human capital. Public Manager, 31(1), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Janie Harden Fritz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fritz, J.H. (2009). Rudeness and Incivility in the Workplace. In: Morrison, R.L., Wright, S.L. (eds) Friends and Enemies in Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248359_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics