Skip to main content

A Journey through Time: Alexander Sokurov’s Russian Ark and Theories of Mimesis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Realism and the Audiovisual Media

Abstract

In the mimeticist inheritance, film as a form of art stands out as a language of time. Temporal coherence and congruity construct — in a schematized structure — a response to a reality and a production of an imaginary world. It would be misleading to evaluate the quality of vraisemblance in a world-reflecting schema and maintain mimesis as a single, fixed reading of art and aesthetics. Rather mimesis presents a quest for meaning, whether that meaning is the issue of discovery or invention, or — most plausibly — both. Alexander Sokurov’s Russian Ark (Russkii kovcheg, 2002) is a universally acclaimed production that questions interpretations based on mimetic dogmas, transcends film genre boundaries and celebrates illusion, visions and dreams. It is a cinematic text that draws on the whole material fabric of culture, including its visual and musical artefacts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auerbach, Erich (1953), Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans. by Willard R. Task, with a new Introduction by Edward W. Said. Princeton/ Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1981), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin, Michael Holquist (ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, Mikhail (1973), Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans. by R. W. Rotsel. Ann Arbor, MI: Ardis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazin, Andr (1971), What is Cinema?, vol. 2, trans. by Hugh Gray. Berkeley/ Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchot, Maurice (1981), The Gaze of Orpheus and Other Literary Essays, preface Geoffrey Hartman, trans. by Lydia Davis, P. Adams Sitney (ed.). New York: Station Hill Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutelbaum, Marshall (1979), ‘Structuring Patterning in the Lumi re Films’, in Wide Angle, 3 (1), pp. 30–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsaesser, Thomas (1990), ‘Introduction’, in Thomas Elsaesser and Adam Barker (eds), Early Cinema: Space, Frame, Narrative. London: British Film Institute.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, Jacques (1977), The Four Fundamental Concepts ofPsycho -Analysis, Jacques-Alain Miller (ed.). London: Hogarth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plato (1953), The Dialogues of Plato, trans. by B. Jowett. Oxford: Clarendon Place.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Alex (1998), ‘A Critic at Large, “The Maestro of Midnight”’, in The New Yorker, 20 April 1998, p. 86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Vlad Strukov

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Strukov, V. (2009). A Journey through Time: Alexander Sokurov’s Russian Ark and Theories of Mimesis. In: Nagib, L., Mello, C. (eds) Realism and the Audiovisual Media. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246973_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics