Skip to main content

Fuller and Mirowski on the Commercialization of Scientific Knowledge

  • Chapter
The Social Sciences and Democracy
  • 185 Accesses

Abstract

As a problem for science studies, the commercialization of scientific knowledge is characterized as whether scientific knowledge is a public good, like health care and education, or a positional good, a good whose value allows for exclusion to clients, the opposite of a public good (Callon 1994; Mirowski and Sent 2007). Mirowski and Sent (2007) have highlighted the problem of the commercialization and privatization of scientific knowledge. Furthermore, Mirowski (2009) avers that the commercialization of scientific knowledge is the apotheosis of a neoliberal program to promote and to construct free markets as the central condition of success of the neoliberal agenda. Mirowski argues that the problem of commercialization of scientific knowledge is that scientific knowledge is being transformed from a public good to a positional good. A further argument from Mirowski (2009b) is that science has been harmed by its commercialization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bowden, G. (2001) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. Canadian Journal of Sociology 26(4), 675–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1994) ‘Is Science a Public Good?’ Science, Technology, & Human Values, 19(4), 395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, James (2000) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. Minerva 38(1), 109–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, James (2002) ‘Scripting the Radical Critique of Science: the Morrill Act and American Land-Grant University.’ Futures 34, 182–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1988) Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1992) ‘Knowledge as Product and Property.’ In: Culture and Power of Knowledge, ed. Nico Stehr and Richard Ericson. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1993) Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1997) Science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (1999) ‘Response to Japanese Social Epistemologists: Some Ways Forward for the 21st Century.’ Social Epistemology 13 (3/4), 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2000a) The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Future of the Open Society. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2000b) E-mail to the author, 22 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2002) Social Epistemology, 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2006) The New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2007) New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2009a, April) ‘In Search of the Sociological Foundations of Humanity.’ History of Human Sciences 22(2), 138–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, S. (2009b) ‘Humanity: The Always Already — Or Never To Be — Object of the Social Sciences.’ This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, D. S. (2007) Science for Sale. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guston, David H. (2002) ‘Secularising Science?’ Futures 34, 197–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. (1988) Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Keith, W. (2002) ‘Good Questions in Search of Good Answers.’ Futures 34, 178–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1993) The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave, eds. (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LopÉz Cerezo, J. A. (2002) ‘The Governance of Science from the Periphery, or a Look at Budapest from Santo Domingo.’ Futures 34, 192–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. E. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Longino, H. E. (2002) The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2004) ‘The Scientific Dimensions of Social Knowledge and Their Distant Echoes in 20th-Century American Philosophy of Science.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35(2), 283–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2009) ‘Viridiana Jones and the Temple of Mammon; Or, Adventures in Neoliberal Studies.’ In: forthcoming book Science Mart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2009a) ‘Defining Neoliberalism.’ In: The Road to Mont Pelerin, ed. Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plewhe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 417–455.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2009b) ‘Has Science Been “Harmed” by the Modern Commercial Regime?” In: forthcoming book Science Mart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2009c) ‘The New Production of Ignorance: The Dirty Little Secret of the New Knowledge Economy.’ In: forthcoming book Science Mart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. and Sent, E.-M. (2007) ‘The Commercialization of Science, and the Response of STS.’ In: The Handbook of Science & Technology Studies, 3rd ed., ed. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch and Judy Wajcman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 635–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M. (1962) ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory.’ Minerva 1, 54–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radder, H. (2000) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. Science, Technology & Human Values 25(4), 520–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, Jerry. (2002) ‘The Challenge Beyond Orthodox Science.’ Futures 34, 200–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remedios, F. (2003) Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge. Lanham, MD. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remedios, F. (2009, April) ‘Fuller’s Project of Humanity: Social Sciences or Sociobiology?’ History of Human Sciences 22(2), 115–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J. (1998) ‘New Philosophies of Science in North America—Twenty Years Later.’ Journal for General Philosophy of Science 29, 71–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmaus, W. (1991, March) ‘Review of Social Epistemology by Steve Fuller.’ Philosophy of Social Sciences 21(1), 121–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, K. Brad. (2001) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. International Studies in Philosophy of Science 15(1), 110–12.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Francis Remedios

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Remedios, F. (2009). Fuller and Mirowski on the Commercialization of Scientific Knowledge. In: Van Bouwel, J. (eds) The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246867_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics