Abstract
As a problem for science studies, the commercialization of scientific knowledge is characterized as whether scientific knowledge is a public good, like health care and education, or a positional good, a good whose value allows for exclusion to clients, the opposite of a public good (Callon 1994; Mirowski and Sent 2007). Mirowski and Sent (2007) have highlighted the problem of the commercialization and privatization of scientific knowledge. Furthermore, Mirowski (2009) avers that the commercialization of scientific knowledge is the apotheosis of a neoliberal program to promote and to construct free markets as the central condition of success of the neoliberal agenda. Mirowski argues that the problem of commercialization of scientific knowledge is that scientific knowledge is being transformed from a public good to a positional good. A further argument from Mirowski (2009b) is that science has been harmed by its commercialization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bowden, G. (2001) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. Canadian Journal of Sociology 26(4), 675–8.
Callon, M. (1994) ‘Is Science a Public Good?’ Science, Technology, & Human Values, 19(4), 395–424.
Collier, James (2000) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. Minerva 38(1), 109–20.
Collier, James (2002) ‘Scripting the Radical Critique of Science: the Morrill Act and American Land-Grant University.’ Futures 34, 182–91.
Fuller, S. (1988) Social Epistemology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fuller, S. (1992) ‘Knowledge as Product and Property.’ In: Culture and Power of Knowledge, ed. Nico Stehr and Richard Ericson. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Fuller, S. (1993) Philosophy of Science and Its Discontents, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fuller, S. (1997) Science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Fuller, S. (1999) ‘Response to Japanese Social Epistemologists: Some Ways Forward for the 21st Century.’ Social Epistemology 13 (3/4), 273–302.
Fuller, S. (2000a) The Governance of Science: Ideology and the Future of the Open Society. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
Fuller, S. (2000b) E-mail to the author, 22 February.
Fuller, S. (2002) Social Epistemology, 2nd ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fuller, S. (2006) The New Sociological Imagination. London: Sage Publications.
Fuller, S. (2007) New Frontiers in Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Fuller, S. (2009a, April) ‘In Search of the Sociological Foundations of Humanity.’ History of Human Sciences 22(2), 138–45.
Fuller, S. (2009b) ‘Humanity: The Always Already — Or Never To Be — Object of the Social Sciences.’ This volume.
Goldman, A. (1999) Knowledge in a Social World. New York: Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, D. S. (2007) Science for Sale. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Guston, David H. (2002) ‘Secularising Science?’ Futures 34, 197–99.
Hull, D. (1988) Science as a Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keith, W. (2002) ‘Good Questions in Search of Good Answers.’ Futures 34, 178–81.
Kitcher, P. (1993) The Advancement of Science: Science without Legend, Objectivity without Illusions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakatos, I. and A. Musgrave, eds. (1970) Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LopÉz Cerezo, J. A. (2002) ‘The Governance of Science from the Periphery, or a Look at Budapest from Santo Domingo.’ Futures 34, 192–6.
Longino, H. E. (1990) Science as Social Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Longino, H. E. (2002) The Fate of Knowledge. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mirowski, P. (2004) ‘The Scientific Dimensions of Social Knowledge and Their Distant Echoes in 20th-Century American Philosophy of Science.’ Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 35(2), 283–326.
Mirowski, P. (2009) ‘Viridiana Jones and the Temple of Mammon; Or, Adventures in Neoliberal Studies.’ In: forthcoming book Science Mart.
Mirowski, P. (2009a) ‘Defining Neoliberalism.’ In: The Road to Mont Pelerin, ed. Philip Mirowski and Dieter Plewhe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 417–455.
Mirowski, P. (2009b) ‘Has Science Been “Harmed” by the Modern Commercial Regime?” In: forthcoming book Science Mart.
Mirowski, P. (2009c) ‘The New Production of Ignorance: The Dirty Little Secret of the New Knowledge Economy.’ In: forthcoming book Science Mart.
Mirowski, P. and Sent, E.-M. (2007) ‘The Commercialization of Science, and the Response of STS.’ In: The Handbook of Science & Technology Studies, 3rd ed., ed. Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch and Judy Wajcman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 635–90.
Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polanyi, M. (1962) ‘The Republic of Science: Its Political and Economic Theory.’ Minerva 1, 54–73.
Radder, H. (2000) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. Science, Technology & Human Values 25(4), 520–7.
Ravetz, Jerry. (2002) ‘The Challenge Beyond Orthodox Science.’ Futures 34, 200–3.
Remedios, F. (2003) Legitimizing Scientific Knowledge. Lanham, MD. Lexington Books.
Remedios, F. (2009, April) ‘Fuller’s Project of Humanity: Social Sciences or Sociobiology?’ History of Human Sciences 22(2), 115–20.
Rouse, J. (1998) ‘New Philosophies of Science in North America—Twenty Years Later.’ Journal for General Philosophy of Science 29, 71–122.
Schmaus, W. (1991, March) ‘Review of Social Epistemology by Steve Fuller.’ Philosophy of Social Sciences 21(1), 121–5.
Wray, K. Brad. (2001) Review of The Governance of Science by Steve Fuller. International Studies in Philosophy of Science 15(1), 110–12.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Francis Remedios
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Remedios, F. (2009). Fuller and Mirowski on the Commercialization of Scientific Knowledge. In: Van Bouwel, J. (eds) The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246867_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246867_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30937-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24686-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)