Abstract
In his 1937 essay Traditional and Critical Theory, Max Horkheimer argued that traditional theory, including the heretofore-existing social sciences, had been fixated on the accumulation of facts in specialized, isolated fields of study. Such a fixation had tended to reproduce the existing social order rather than question — let alone challenge — it, Horkheimer contended. In contrast, he proposed a Critical Theory that would recognize that the production of knowledge is not to be detached from social power relations and interests, from its embeddedness in society. Like Karl Marx, the younger Horkheimer and his colleagues of the Frankfurt School believed that (critical) theory and knowledge could and should change society by helping those oppressed to identify and emancipate themselves from their oppression. As a theory, it understands the totality of society in its historical specificity, and it is normative, driven by specific social interests, seeking “to liberate human beings from the circumstances that enslave them” (1982, p. 244) and advancing “the abolition of social injustice” (1982, p. 242).1 This Critical Theory, Horkheimer argued, should integrate all the major social sciences, including economics, sociology, history, political science, anthropology and psychology, establishing a unifying new science that elaborates one comprehensive theory, a version of historical materialism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bohman, J. (1999) ‘Theories, Practices, and Pluralism. A Pragmatic Interpretation of Critical Social Science.’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29(4), 459–80.
Cunningham, F. (2002) Theories of Democracy: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Horkheimer, M. (1970) Traditionelle und Kritische Theorie (Orig. 1937). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Bücherei.
Horkheimer, M. (1982) Critical Theory: Selected Essays. New York: Continuum.
Peter, F. (2007) ‘Democratic Legitimacy and Proceduralist Social Epistemology.’ Politics, Philosophy, and Economics 6(3), 329–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Jeroen Van Bouwel
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Van Bouwel, J. (2009). Where the Epistemic and the Political Meet: An Introduction to the Social Sciences and Democracy. In: Van Bouwel, J. (eds) The Social Sciences and Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246867_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246867_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30937-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24686-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)