Skip to main content

Panic and Perjury: A Psychosocial Exploration of Agency

  • Chapter
Emotion

Abstract

The primary aim of this chapter is to explore the predicament of one man, Vince, in difficult circumstances, in order to produce a psychosocial analysis that could contribute to the understanding of agency. In the process we note the role of what we prefer to call affect, rather than emotion, in most contexts. If emotions are, as Blackman and Cromby (2007, p. 6) suggest, ‘those patterned brain/body responses that are culturally recognizable and provide some unity, stability and coherence to the felt dimensions of our relational encounters’, it is perhaps unsurprising that, because we are focusing on unconscious dynamics in this chapter, the term affect proves more relevant to our analysis than the emotions of anger and shame that are, arguably, the core suppressed emotions in the account. Vince himself never talked in terms of specific emotions, but rather, in line with Black- man and Cromby’s definition that ‘feelings register intensive experiences as subjective experience’ (ibid.), of how he was experiencing his painful world. In highlighting his embodied ‘sickness’, and the accompanying anxiety, we focus on the affective dimension. In this usage, anxiety is an affective state.

An extended version of this paper was published in 2005 in the British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 2, 147–163; the text is used with kind permission.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Barnes, B. (2000) Understanding Agency: Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bion, W. (1962) Learning from Experience. London: Maresfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, L. and Cromby, J. (2007) ‘Editorial: Affect and Feeling’. Critical Psychology, 21, 5–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (1995) In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, B. (1993) Goliath: Britain’s Dangerous Places. London: Virago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, N., Henriques, F. and Slaughter, C. (1956) Coal Is Our Life. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (1992) Social Theory and Psychoanalysis in Transition. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, A. (2001) Concepts of the Self. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S., Phoenix, A. and Pattman, R. (2003) ‘Taking a Stand: Using Psychoanalysis to Explore the Positioning of Subjects in Discourse’. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 39–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. (1989) ‘Social Psychology and the Wrong Revolution’. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 463–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1979) Central Problems in Social Theory. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, D. (1993) Manhood in the Making: Cultural Concepts of Masculinity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1982) Farewell to the Working Class: An Essay on Post-Industrial Socialism. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorz, A. (1989) Critique of Economic Reason. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1977) ‘The Self in Monodrama’. In Mischel, T. (ed.) The Self. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 318–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (1984) ‘Gender Difference and the Production of Subjectivity’. In Hen-riques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C. and Walkerdine, V. (eds) Changing the Subject: Psychology, Social Regulation and Subjectivity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. (2004) ‘An Appropriate Research Paradigm for Evaluating Psychoanalytically-Informed Practices’. International Journal of Infant Observation and its Applications, 7(2/3), 26–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollway, W. and Jefferson, T. (2000) Doing Qualitative Research Differently: Free Association, Narrative and the Interview Method. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac an Ghaill, M. (1994) The Making of Men: Masculinities, Sexualities and Schooling. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. and M. Wetherell (1987) Discourse and Social Psychology: Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2009 Wendy Hollway and Tony Jefferson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hollway, W., Jefferson, T. (2009). Panic and Perjury: A Psychosocial Exploration of Agency. In: Sclater, S.D., Jones, D.W., Price, H., Yates, C. (eds) Emotion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230245136_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics