Skip to main content
  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

In The Origin of Species, Darwin urged scientists to’ study the oddities of nature’. Perhaps Darwin had in mind Anelasma ibla or any other of the sub-class of cirripeds he studied in his exhaustive attempt to understand the structures and processes of nature. Darwin’s ‘barnacle work’ took years to accomplish, involved international correspondence with scientists and naturalists, and the dissection of hundreds of specimens.

Not that it really matters whether or not he [sic] ever knows about the vast populations of inorganic life, the ‘thousand tiny sexes’ which are coursing through his veins with a promiscuity of which he cannot conceive. He’s the one who misses out. Fails to adapt. Can’t see the point of his sexuality. Those who believe in their own organic integrity are all too human for the future [to come].1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sadie Plant, Zeros + Ones: Digital Women + The New Technoculture (New York: Doubleday, 1997), 205.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elizabeth Wilson, ‘Biologically Inspired Feminism: Response to Helen Keane and Marsha Rosengarten,“On the Biology of Sexed Subjects,”’ Australian Feminist Studies 17, no. 39 (2002): 283–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sharon Kinsman, ‘Life, Sex and Cells’, in Feminist Science Studies, eds. Mayberry, Subramaniam and Weasel (New York: Routledge, 2001), 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  4. Harriet Zuckerman and Josh Lederberg, ‘Postmature Scientific Discovery?’ Nature 324 (1986): 629–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Janet Browne’s article, ‘Botany for Gentlemen’ provides a lively and thorough critique of Erasmus Darwin’s poem ‘The Love of the Plants’. The poem, meant as a vindication of Linneas’s plant taxonomy, reified very familiar and highly normative conceptions of 19th century British femininity and masculinity. See Janet Browne, ‘Botany for Gentlemen’, Isis 80, no. 4 (1989): 593–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Londa Schiebinger, Nature’s Body: Sexual Politics and the Making of Modern Science (London: Pandora, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Myra Hird, Sex, Gender and Science (New York: Palgrave, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Emile Durkheim, Suicide (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970), 385.

    Google Scholar 

  9. John Maynard-Smith, The Evolution of Sex (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Charles Darwin The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex (London: John Murray, 1890)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ernst Mayr, What Evolution Is (New York: Basic Books, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J.L. Mackay, ‘Why Have Sex?’, British Medical Journal 322, no. 7286 (2001): 623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. See, respectively, William Hamilton, Robert Axelrod, and Reiko Tanese, ‘Sexual Reproduction as an Adaptation to Resist Parasites’, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 87 (1990): 3566–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Aneil Agrawal, ‘Similarity Selection and the Evolution of Sex: Revisiting the Red Queen’, PLOS Biol. 4 (2006): 1364–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alexey Kondrashov, ‘Deleterious Mutations and the Evolution of Sexual Reproduction’, Nature 336 (1988): 435–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R.A. Fisher, The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Joseph Felsenstein, ‘The Evolutionary Advantage of Recombination’, Genetics 78, no. 2 (1974): 737–56.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Graham Bell, The Masterpiece of Nature: The Evolution and Genetics of Sexuality (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1982), 99

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lynn Margulis in Lawrence Joseph, Gia: The Growth of an Idea (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1990), 63.

    Google Scholar 

  20. George Krizek, ‘Unusual Interaction Between a Butterfly and a Beetle:“Sexual Paraphilia” in Insects?’ Tropical Lepidoptera 3, no. 2 (1992): 118.

    Google Scholar 

  21. David Policansky, ‘Sex Change in Plants and Animals’, Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13 (1982): 471–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. See also Denis Owen, ‘Mimicry and Transvestism in Papilio phorcas’, Journal of Entomological Society of Southern Africa 51 (1988): 294–6

    Google Scholar 

  23. Joan Roughgarden, Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, and Sexuality in Nature and People (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Theo Colborn, Dianne Dumanoski and John Peterson Myers, Our Stolen Future (London: Little Brown and Company, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Leonard Paulozzi, J. David Erickson and Richard J. Jackson, ‘Hypospadias Trends in Two American Surveillance Systems’, Pediatrics 100 (1997): 831–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Helen Dolk, M. Vrijheid, B. Armstrong, L. Abramsky, F. Bianchi, E. Garne, V. Nelen, E. Robert, J.E. Scott, D. Stone and R. Tenconi, ‘Risk of Congenital Anomalies Near Hazardous Waste Landfill Sites in Europe: The EUROHAZCON Study’, The Lancet 352 (8 August 1998): 423–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim Sterelny and Paul Griffiths, Sex and Death: An Introduction to Philosophy of Biology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999), 71.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Vaclav Smil, The Earth’s Biosphere: Evolution, Dynamics, and Change (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002), 79.

    Google Scholar 

  29. L.R. Cleveland, ‘The Origin of Evolution of Meiosis’, Science 105(1947): 287–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Anne Fausto-Sterling, ‘Feminism and Behavioral Evolution: A Taxonomy’, in Feminism and Evolutionary Biology, ed. Patricia Adair Gowaty (New York: Chapman and Hall, 1997), 54.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vicky Kirby, ‘Subject to Natural Law: A Mediation on the“Two Cultures” Problem’, Australian Feminist Studies 23, no. 55 (2008): 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Elizabeth Grosz, The Nick of Time (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2004), 91.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Elizabeth Grosz, Time Travels: Feminism, Nature, Power (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2005), 6.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  34. Marianne Schwartz and John Vissing, ‘Paternal Inheritance of Mitochondrial DNA’, New England Journal of Medicine 347, no. 8 (2002): 576–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Yevgenya Kraytsberg, Marianne Schwartz, Timothy A. Brown, Konstantin Ebralidse, Wolfram S. Kunz, David A. Clayton, John Vissing and Konstantin Khrapko, ‘Recombination of Human Mitochondrial DNA’, Science 304 (2004): 981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Myra J. Hird

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hird, M.J. (2009). Microontologies of Sex. In: The Origins of Sociable Life: Evolution After Science Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230242210_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics