Abstract
What happened to letting to halves, and other forms of sharefarming, in the eighteenth century? In the 1770s Adam Smith, as we have seen, dismissed métayage as a practice so long in disuse in England that he knew no English name for it, while Arthur Young, a decade later, claimed that the very success of English agriculture rested on the absence of such a system.1 How had a practice, prevalent less than a century before, disappeared from view? None of the county reports, drawn up in the 1790s for the newly formed Board of Agriculture, contain any reference to métayage, and as far as we know, Smith and Young are the only English authors to have commented on the practice at this time.2 They were not challenged in their observations until John Stuart Mill wrote favourably on métayage in the 1840s, criticizing Young for his ‘extremely narrow view of the subject’.3 However, Mill accepted Young’s contention that métayage was not an English practice, and on those grounds he did not advocate its adoption in England, preferring a revival of peasant proprietorship. Significantly, when proposing peasant proprietorship, Mill felt obliged to explain the term and its virtues as Englishmen were ‘profoundly ignorant’ of the idea. Steeped in the language of agricultural improvement, led by landlords and tenants, they had progressed so far beyond their peasant origins, that they had no knowledge or understanding of the social condition of peasants or mode of life, and little interest either.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
A. Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, (1776) Book 3, Part 2, pp. 470–80; A. Young, Travels Through France During the Years 1787, 1788 and 1789, ed. C. Maxwell, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1929), pp. 16
G.E. Mingay, ‘The Agricultural Depression, 1730–1750’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, 8 (1956) 323–38
J.V. Beckett, ‘Regional Variation and the Agricultural Depression, 1730–1750’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, 35 (1982) 35–51
R.A. Dodgshon, ‘Coping with Risk: Subsistence Crises in the Scottish Highlands and Islands, 1600–1800’, Rural History, 1 (2004) 1–25.
M. Turner, ‘The land tax, land, and property: old debates and new horizons’, in M. Turner and D. Mills (eds) Land Tax and property: The English Land Tax, 1692–1832, (Gloucester: Alan Sutton, 1986), pp. 1–35.
P. Jenkins, The Making of a Ruling Class: The Glamorgan Gentry, 1640–1790, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983)
J.M. Rosenheim, The To nshends of Raynham: Nobility in Transition in Restoration and Early Hanoverian England, (Middletown, Ct.: Wesleyan University Press, 1989)
J.M. Rosenheim, ‘County governance and elite withdrawal in Norfolk, 1660–1720’ in A.L. Beier, D. Cannadine and J.M. Rosenheim (eds) The First Modern Society: Essays in English History in Honour of La rence Stone, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 106–15.
M. Overton, Agricultural Revolution in England: The Transformation of the Agrarian Economy, 1500–1850, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 168–78.
D. Stead, ‘Risk and risk management in English Agriculture, 1750–1850’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, 57 (2004), pp. 334–5.
R.C. Allen, Enclosure and the Yeoman: The Agricultural Development of the South Midlands, 1450–1850, (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).
R. Santos, ‘Risk-sharing and social differentiation of demand in land-tenancy markets in southern Portugal, seventeenth-nineteenth centuries’, Continuity and Change, 21 (2006) 287–312.
G.E. Mingay, ‘The Size of Farms in the Eighteenth Century’, Economic History Review, 2nd series, 14 (1962) 469–88
R. Mitchison, ‘The Old Board of Agriculture, 1793–1822’, English Historical Review, 74 (1959) 41–69.
P. Horn, ‘The Dorset dairy system’, Agricultural HistoryRevie, 26 (1978) 100–7.
C.A. Horn, ‘Two Centuries of Incentive Payments in Agriculture’, The Accountants’ Revie, 26 (1975), p. 223.
G.V. Harrison, ‘The South West: Dorset, Somerset, Devon, and Cornwall’, in J. Thirsk (ed.) The Agrarian History of England Wales, Vol. V, 1640–1750. I. Regional Farming Systems (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984), p. 378
A.R. Wilson, Forgotten Harvest: The Story of Cheesemaking in Wiltshire, (Calne: the author, 1995)
J. Carmona, ‘Sharecropping and livestock specialization in France, 1830–1930’, Continuity and Change, 21 (2006) 235–59.
S. Ogilvie, ‘“Whatever is, is right?” Economic institutions in pre-industrial Europe’, Economic History Revie, 2nd series, 60 (2007) 649–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 Elizabeth Madeleine Griffiths and Mark Overton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Griffiths, E., Overton, M. (2009). Sharefarming Disappears from the Documents in the Eighteenth Century. In: Farming to Halves. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240827_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230240827_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30037-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-24082-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)