Advertisement

The Automotive Industry and Environmental Regulations: Challenges to Corporate Political Activities of Multinational Enterprises in the European Union

  • Sigrun M. Wagner
Part of the The Academy of International Business book series

Abstract

This chapter deals with corporate political activities (CPA) of multinational companies in the European Union regarding environmental regulations for the automotive industry. The research covers an important aspect of the AIB 2008 theme on Challenges to International Business, that is, the impact of MNCs on the physical environment and attempts to mitigate this impact.

Keywords

European Union Environmental Regulation Automotive Industry International Business Multinational Enterprise 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACEA (2007) New passenger car registrations. Retrieved 12 July 2007, from http://www.acea.beGoogle Scholar
  2. Barney, J.B. (1991) ‘Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage’, Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blumentritt, T.P. and Nigh, D. (2002) ‘The integration of subsidiary political activities in multinational corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (1), 57–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boddewyn, J.J. (1988) ‘Political aspects of MNE theory’, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, 341–63.Google Scholar
  5. Boddewyn, J.J. (2003) ‘Understanding and advancing the concept of “nonmarket”’, Business and Society, 42 (3), 297–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boddewyn, J.J. and Brewer, T.L. (1994) ‘International-business political behavior: New theoretical directions’, Academy of Management Review, 19 (1), 119–43.Google Scholar
  7. Bryman, A. and Bell, E. (2003) Business Research Methods (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Coffey, A. and Atkinson, P. (1996) Making Sense of Qualitative Data: Complementary Research Strategies ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  9. Dahan, N. (2005) ‘A contribution to the conceptualization of political resources utilized in corporate political action’, Journal ofPublic Affairs, 5 (1), 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DG Environment (2007) Directorate General Environment of European Commission, Website. Retrieved July 12, 2007, from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/environment/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar
  11. Dierckx, I. and Cool, K. (1989) Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage, Management Science, 35 (12), 1504–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dieselnet (2007) Emissions Standards Europe: Cars and Light Trucks. Retrieved 11 October 2007, from http://www.dieselnet.com/standards/eu/ld.phpGoogle Scholar
  13. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989) ‘Building theories from case study research’, Academy ofManagement Review, 1989, 14 (4), 532–50.Google Scholar
  14. Fiol, C.M. (1991) ‘Managing culture as a competitive resource: An identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage’, Journal ofManagement, 17 (1), 191–211.Google Scholar
  15. Frynas, J.G., Mellahi, Kamel and Pigman, G.A. (2006) ‘First mover advantages in international business and firm-specific political resources’, Strategic Management Journal, 27 (4), 321–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Getz, K.A. (1997) ‘Research in corporate political action: Integration and assessment’, Business and Society, 36 (1), 32–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gillham, B. (2000) Case Study Research Methods ( London: Continuum).Google Scholar
  18. Grant, R.M. (1991) The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation, California Management Review, 33 (3), 114–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grant, W. (1993) ‘Pressure Groups and the European Community’, in S. Mazey and J.J. Richardson (eds) Lobbying in the European Community, 27–46 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).Google Scholar
  20. Hillman, A.J. and Hitt, M.A. (1999) ‘Corporate political strategy formulation: A model of approach, participation, and strategy decisions’, Academy of Management Review, 24 (4), 825–42.Google Scholar
  21. Hillman, A.J., Keim, G.D. and Schuler, D. (2004) ‘Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda’, Journal ofManagement, 30 (6), 837–57.Google Scholar
  22. Hoopes, D.G., Madsen, G.L. and Walker, G. (2003) ‘Guest editors’ introduction to the special issue: Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity’, Strategic Management Journal (Special issue), 24(10), 889–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Keay-Bright, S. (2000) A critical analysis of the voluntary fuel economy agreement, established between the European automobile manufacturers and the European Commission, with regard for its capacity to protect the environment, European Environmental Bureau, available at http://www.eeb.org/publication/2000/ACEA-10-final-complete.pdf (accessed 17 February 2006 ).Google Scholar
  24. Krämer, L. (1997) Focus on European Environmental Law, 2nd edn ( London: Sweet & Maxwell).Google Scholar
  25. Krämer, L. (2000) E.C. Environmental Law, 4th edn ( London: Sweet & Maxwell).Google Scholar
  26. Levy, D.L. and Egan, D. (2003) A neo-Gramscian approach to corporate political strategy: Conflict and accommodation in the climate change negotiations, Journal ofManagement Studies, 40 (4), 803–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Levy, D.L. and Rothenberg, S. (1999) Corporate Strategy and Climate Change: Heterogeneity and Change in the Global Automobile Industry. ENRP Discussion Paper E-99–13, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  28. Mazey, S. and Richardson, J.J. (eds) (1993) Lobbying in the European Community ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).Google Scholar
  29. McLaughlin, A. and Jordan, G. (1993) ‘The Rationality of Lobbying in Europe: Why are Euro-Groups so Numerous and so Weak? Some Evidence from the Car Industry’, in S. Mazey and J.J. Richardson (eds), Lobbying in the European Community, 122–61 ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).Google Scholar
  30. McWilliams, A., Van Fleet, D.D. and Cory, K.D. (2002) ‘Raising rivals’ costs through political strategy: An extension of resource-based theory’, Journal ofManagement Studies, 39 (5), 707–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Miles, M.B. and Hubermann, A.M. (1984) Qualitative Data Analysis: a Sourcebook of New Methods ( Newbury Park, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  32. Miles, M.B. and Hubermann, A.M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis: an Expanded Sourcebook, 2nd edn ( Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage).Google Scholar
  33. Moon, C.W. and Lado, A.A. (2000) MNC-host government bargaining power relationship: A critique and extension within the resource-based view, Journal of Management, 26 (1), 85–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Morgan, G., Kristensen, Peer Hull and Whitley, R. (2001) The Multinational Firm: Organizing Across Institutional and National Divides ( Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  35. Morgan, G., Whitley, R. and Moen, E. (eds) (2005) Changing Capitalisms? Internationalization, Institutional Change, and Systems of Economic Organization ( Oxford: Oxford University Press ).Google Scholar
  36. Nieuwenhuis, P. and Wells, P. (2003) TheAutomotiveIndustry and the Environment(Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing).Google Scholar
  37. Pedler, R.H. (ed.) (2002) European Union Lobbying: Changes in the Arena ( Basingstoke: Palgrave ).Google Scholar
  38. Peng, M.W. (2001) ‘The Resource-Based View and International Business’, Journal of Management, 27, 803–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Penrose, E.T. (1959) The Theory of the Growth of the Firm ( Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar
  40. Peteraf, M.A. (1993) ‘The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view’, Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), 179–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rieksmaier, J. (ed.) (2007) Praxisbuch: Politische Interessenvermittlung: Instrumente—Kampagnen—Lobbying (Manual: Political interest representation: Instruments—Campaigns—Lobbying). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
  42. Rugman, A.M. and Verbeke, A. (1998) ‘Corporate strategies and environmental regulations: An organizing framework’, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 363–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rumelt, R.P. (1984) ‘Towards a strategic theory of the firm’, in R.B. Lamb (ed.), Competitive Strategic Management, 556–70 ( Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall ).Google Scholar
  44. Rumelt, R.P. (1987) ‘Theory, strategy, and entrepreneurship’, in D.J. Teece (ed.), The Competitive Challenge, 137–158 ( Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Company ).Google Scholar
  45. Shaffer, B. (1995)‘Firm-level responses to government regulation: Theoretical and researchapproaches’, Journal of Management, 21(3), 495–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Spell, S. (2000) Japanese Automobile Lobbying in Brussels: the Role of the Japanese Motor Car Industry in EU Policy Networks. PhD Thesis, Stirling, University of Stirling, Scottish Centre for Japanese Studies, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  47. Van Tulder, R. and Van der Zwart, A. (2006) International Business-Society Management: Linking Corporate Responsibility and Globalization ( London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  48. Wernerfelt, B. (1984) ‘The resource-based view of the firm’, Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitley, R. (1991) ‘The social construction of business systems in East Asia’, Organization Studies, 12, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whitley, R. (1992) European Business Systems: Firms and Markets in Their National Contexts ( London: Sage).Google Scholar
  51. Yin, R.K. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn ( Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Sigrun M. Wagner 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sigrun M. Wagner

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations