Skip to main content

On the Existence of Paretian Social Welfare Quasi-Orderings for Infinite Utility Streams with Extended Anonymity

  • Chapter
Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

Abstract

In ranking social states, which are specified by infinite utility streams, it is customary to use a social welfare quasi-ordering (SWQ), a reflexive and transitive binary relation on the social states, satisfying two widely accepted guiding principles. The equal treatment of all generations, proposed by Ramsey (1928), is formalized in the Finite Anonymity Axiom. The positive sensitivity of the social preference structure to the well-being of each generation is reflected in the Pareto Axiom.

We would like to thank Shankar Sen for helpful conversations, and specifically for suggesting the characterization result which appears as Lemma 1 in the chapter. An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the IEA Roundtable Meeting in Hakone, Japan, 10–12 March 2005, and the present version has benefited from comments by Geir Asheim, Claude d’Aspremont, Kuntal Banerjee, Marc Fleurbaey and Wlodek Rabinowicz.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Asheim, G.B., W. Buchholz and B. Tungodden (2001) ‘Justifying Sustainability’, Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 41, pp. 252–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asheim, G.B. and B. Tungodden (2004) ‘Resolving Distributional Conflicts between Generations’, Economic Theory, vol. 24, pp. 221–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’aspremont, C. (1985) ‘Axioms for Social Welfare Orderings’, in L. Hurwicz, D. Schmeidler and H. Sonnenschein (eds), Social Goals and Social Organizations: Essays in Memory of Elisha l’azner ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ), pp. 19–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, K. (2006) ‘On the Extension of the Utilitarian and Suppes-Sen Social Welfare Relations to Infinite Utility Streams’, Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 27, pp. 327–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basu, K. and T. Mitra (2003) ‘Aggregating Infinite Utility Streams with Intergenerational Equity: The Impossibility of Being Paretian’, Econometrica, vol. 71, pp. 1557–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, R.G. (1950) Infinite Matrices and Sequence Spaces ( London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, P. (1965) ‘The Evaluation of Infinite Utility Streams’, Econometrica, vol. 33,pp. 170–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleurbaey, M. and P. Michel (2003) ‘Intertemporal Equity and the Extension of the Ramsey Principle’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 39, pp. 777–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohn, F.E. (1973) Elementary Matrix Algebra ( New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, L. (1995) ‘Time-Neutrality and Linearity’, Journal of Mathematical Economics, vol. 24, pp. 347–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, L. (1997) ‘Rawlsian Equity and Generalized Utilitarianism with an Infinite Population’, Economic Theory, vol. 9, pp. 143–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lauwers, L. (1998) ‘Intertemporal Objective Functions: Strong Pareto versus Anonymity’, Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 35, pp. 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liedekerke, L. and L. Lauwers (1997) ‘Sacrificing the Patrol: Utilitarianism, Future Generations and Infinity’, Economics and Philosophy, vol. 13, pp. 159–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, F.P. (1928) ‘A Mathematical Theory of Savings’, Economic Journal, vol. 38,pp. 543–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, W. (1976) Principles of Mathematical Analysis ( New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, P. (1981) ‘Sum-Preserving Rearrangements of Infinite Series’, American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 88, pp. 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K. (1970) Collective Choice and Social Welfare ( San Francisco: Holden-Day).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1966) ‘Some Formal Models of Grading Principles’, Synthèse, vol. 6, pp. 284–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, L.-G. (1980) ‘Equity among Generations’, Econometrica, vol. 48, pp. 1251–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitra, T., Basu, K. (2007). On the Existence of Paretian Social Welfare Quasi-Orderings for Infinite Utility Streams with Extended Anonymity. In: Roemer, J., Suzumura, K. (eds) Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230236769_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics