Skip to main content
  • 130 Accesses

Abstract

The focus of this chapter is Schmitt’s work on Hobbes’s Leviathan, published in 1938. My aim is to show that from an analysis of this work we can not only better understand the nature and limits of Schmitt’s admiration for Hobbes, but also, and more importantly, we can gain a better understanding of Schmitt’s conception of hostility and politics. Textual analysis will show that Schmitt strongly approved of Hobbes’s attempt to make domestic hostility impossible and to ensure internal peace, but believed that Hobbes failed to deliver on his promise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See M. Ojakangas, A Philosophy of Concrete Life: Carl Schmitt and the Political Thought of Late Modernity (New York: Lang, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schmitt singles out Machiavelli as a precursor of the nationalist myth famously described by Mussolini in October 1922 before the March on Rome. See C. Schmitt, The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy (Cambridge Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1988), p. 76.

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Schmitt, The Leviathan in the State Theory of Thomas Hobbes (Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press, [1938] 1996), p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  4. L. Strauss, The Political Philosophy of Hobbes (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, [1936] 1952), p. 26.

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Hobbes, Leviathan, edited by E. Curley (Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett, [1651] 1994), p. 36.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See S. Wolin, Politics and Vision (Princeton: Princeton University Press, [1960] 2004), p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  7. T. Hobbes, The Elements of Law, Natural and Politic (London: Frank Cass, [1642] 1969), p. 139.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Bloch, Natural Law and Human Dignity (Baskerville: MIT Press, 1996), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schmitt regarded C.E. Vaughan as ‘a distinguished English authority on Hobbes’, C. Schmitt, op. cit., quoted from E. Voegelin, The New Science of Politics. (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, [1952] 1987), p. 21.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.E. Vaughan, Studies in the History of Political Philosophy Before and After Rousseau, Vol. One (Manchester: Manchester Press, 1925), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  11. E. Van der Zweerde, ‘Friendship and the Political’, Critical Review of International and Social Political Philosophy, 10:2 (2007) 147–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. C. Schmitt, Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty (Baskerville: MIT Press, [1922, 1934] 1985), p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. C. Schmitt, Concept of the Political (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, [1932] 1996), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  14. ‘Nirgendwo anders ist die Trennung von Innen und Auβen bis zu dieser Beziehungslosigkeit von Innen und Auβen getrieben worden. Die innerliche, restlose Gleichschaltung [...] einer derartigen Bildungsschicht ist ebenso schwierig, wie ihre äuβerliche Gleichschaltung glatt und einfach vonstatten geht’, C. Schmitt, Ex Captivitate Salus (Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, [1950] 2002), pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  15. An interesting discussion of Hobbes and Schmitt on democracy and the case of exception can be found in T. Sorell, ‘Schmitt, Hobbes and the Politics of Emergency’, Filozofski Vestnik, 24:2 (2003) 223–41.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. Locke, Two Treatises on Government, 1690 quoted by C.J. Friedrich, Tradition & Authority (London: Pall Mall Press, 1972), p. 66

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. I. Hampsher-Monk and K. Zimmerman, ‘Liberal Constitutionalism and Schmitt’s Critique’, History of Political Thought, 28:4 (2007) 678–96

    Google Scholar 

  18. W. Scheuerman, ‘The rule of law under siege: Carl Schmitt and the death of the Weimar Republic’, History of Political Thought, 14 (1993) 265–80

    Google Scholar 

  19. W. Sheuermann, ‘American Kingship? Monarchical origins of modern presidentialism’, Polity, 37:1 (2005) 24–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Clement Fatovic, ‘The Political Theology of Prerogative: The Jurisprudential Miracle in Liberal Constitutional Thought’, Perspectives on Politics, 6:3 (2008) 487–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Clement Fatovic, ‘Constitutionalism and contingency: Locke’s theory of prerogative’, History of Political Thought, 25:2 (2004) 276–97

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pasquale Pasquino, ‘Locke on king’s prerogative’, Political Theory, 26:2 (1998) 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2009 Gabriella Slomp

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Slomp, G. (2009). On Domestic Hostility. In: Carl Schmitt and the Politics of Hostility, Violence and Terror. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234673_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics