Abstract
At some time in the second half of the fifth century BC, the sculptor Polyclitus published a book called the Canon, in which he set out a pattern for human beauty.1 To illustrate the principles on which it was based, he cast the Doryphoros, a bronze statue of a nude carrying a spear which, owing to its association with the book, came to be known as the ‘Canon’ as well.2 Sadly, Polyclitus’ book survives only in a few second-hand references, and the statue only in later copies, and this makes it impossible to gain a very precise idea either of Polyclitus’ methods or his conclusions. What we do know, however, is that he specified that each part of the body should be of ‘mean’ (i.e. moderate) size, and relate to every other part according to some principle of symmetria (i.e. due proportion): ‘finger to finger, and all to the wrist, and these to the forearm, the forearm to the arm, and everything to everything else’.3 As far as this evidence goes, Polyclitus appears to have thought that the aesthetics of the human form was no less, but no more, than a particularly elaborate exercise in geometry.4
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Principal ancient testimonia relating to the Canon are collected at H. Diels and W. Kranz, Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker, 6th edn (Berlin, 1951) [DK] §40 (at vol. 1, pp. 391–393).
A. H. Borbein, ‘Polykleitos’, in O. Palagia and J. J. Pollitt (eds), Personal Styles in Greek Sculpture. Yale Classical Studies 30 (Cambridge, Mass., 1996), pp. 66–90.
Compare an idea prevalent in modern science that physical attractiveness can be explained in terms of evolutionary advantage: a recent example is G. Jasienska, A. Ziomkiewicz, P. T. Ellison, S. F. Lipson, I. Thune, ‘Large Breasts and Narrow Waists Indicate High Reproductive Potential in Women’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B 271 (2004), pp. 1213–1217.
An interesting example, not least because it is concerned with an issue of constant interest to the ancient phsyiognomists, is T. J. Williams, M. E. Pepitone, S. E. Christensen, B. M. Cooke, A. D. Huberman, N. J. Breedlove, T. J. Breedlove, C. L. Jordan, S. M. Breedlove, ‘Finger-Length Ratios and Sexual Orientation’, Nature, vol. 404 (2000), pp. 455–456
There is a curious convergence between this idea and more recent research which has shown that it is ‘average’ features that people find most attractive. See especially J. H. Langlois and L. A. Roggman, ‘Attractive Faces are Only Average’, Psychological Science, vol. 1 (1990), pp. 115–121.
It is sometimes inferred from a report that Varro called Polyclitus’ statues’ square’ (quadrata): see Pliny, Natural History, 34.56 with A. F. Stewart, ‘Lyisippan Studies 1. The Only Creator of Beauty’, American Journal of Archaeology, vol. 82 (1978), pp. 163–171
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2009 George Boys-Stones
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boys-Stones, G. (2009). Polyclitus among the Philosophers: Canons of Classical Beauty. In: Saunders, C., Maude, U., Macnaughton, J. (eds) The Body and the Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234000_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230234000_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-36262-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-23400-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)