Abstract
In order to begin the process of situating Hazlitt’s linguistic work in the context of eighteenth-century philology, his response(s) to the philosophical grammar movement will be considered, with particular emphasis falling upon his complex reaction to Horne Tooke. As noted earlier, even though Hazlitt’s assessment of Horne Tooke’s theorising has sometimes been evaluated in the past, the critical tradition has usually focused primarily (and often exclusively) upon the former’s rejection of the latter’s empiricism, and Park, Bromwich, Natarajan and others have all attempted to elucidate Hazlitt’s distinctive brand of philosophical idealism. This requires an understanding of the way in which his philosophical preoccupations developed in direct response to dominant trends in seventeenth- and eighteenth-century thought, and, accordingly, his writings have been juxtaposed with those of Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, David Hume, George Berkeley, Jeremy Bentham, to name just a few. However, since Hazlitt’s interest in the interconnections between philology and philosophy was both acute and abiding, his linguistic work is rather more intricate than is generally supposed. For instance, rather than merely revealing the nature of his idealism, it also manifests his concern for the methodology of grammatical analysis — and, although these issues are closely related, they are certainly not identical.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Chapter 3
For instance, see Aarsleff 1983 and Olivia Smith, The Politics of Language: 1791–1819 (Oxford: The Clarendon Press, 1984).
Gerald Newman, The Rise of English Nationalism: A Cultural History, 1720–1830, revised ed. (New York: Saint Martin’s Press, 1997), 184.
James C. McKusick, Coleridge’s Philosophy of Language ( New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1986), 43.
Stephen Land, From Signs to Propositions: the Concept of Form in Eighteenth-century Semantic Theory (London: Longman, 1974), 4.
Tim Milnes, Knowledge and Indifference in English Romantic Prose ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 106.
Copyright information
© 2009 Marcus Tomalin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tomalin, M. (2009). Philology and Philosophical Grammar. In: Romanticism and Linguistic Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228313_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230228313_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30429-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-22831-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)