Advertisement

Configuring the Cognitive Imagination

  • Jonathan M. Weinberg
Part of the New Waves in Philosophy book series (NWIP)

Abstract

My goal here is to advocate for a naturalistic theory of the imagination that concerns the ways that different parts of our mind can be configured to interact with the imagination. This account will serve as a framework for investigating a range of imaginative phenomena of interest to aestheticians, including genre, imaginative blockage, and the range of conative states we take on in engaging with various fictions. But to tell this story about how the imagination interacts with various parts of the mind, I first need to tell the tale of what those parts are, and indeed what the imagination is such that it makes sense to talk about such interactions.

Keywords

Moral Psychology Folk Psychology Experimental Philosophy Explanatory Resource Fictional World 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Alexander, J. and Weinberg, J. 2007. ‘Analytic Epistemology and Experimental Philosophy’, Philosophy Compass, 2: 56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atran, S. 1998. ‘Folk Biology and the Anthropology of Science: Cognitive Universals and Cultural Particulars’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21: 547–609.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bingham, G. 1988. ‘Task-specific Devices and the Perceptual Bottleneck’, Human Movement. Science, 7: 225–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blair, J. Marsh, A.A. Finger, E. Blair, and Luo, J. 2006. ‘Neuro-cognitive Systems Involved in Morality’, Philosophical Explorations, 9.1: 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carroll, N. 1990. Paradoxes of the Heart, or, A Philosophy of Horror, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, N. 1998. Philosophy of Mass Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Carruthers, P. 2006. ‘Why Pretend?’ in S. Nichols (ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cavell, S. 1979. The World Viewed, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, A. 1997. Being There: Putting Brain, Body and World Together Again, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Currie, G. 1995. ‘The Moral Psychology of Fiction’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 73: 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Currie, G. 2001. ‘Imagination and Make-Believe’ in B. Gaut and D. McIver Lopes (eds), Routledge Companion to Aesthetics, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Currie, G. 2002. ‘Imagination as Motivation’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 102.1: 201–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Currie, G. and Ravenscroft, I. 2002. Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doggett, T. and Egan, A. 2007. ‘Wanting Things You Don’t Want’, Philosopher’s Imprint.Google Scholar
  16. Gendler, T.S. 2000. ‘The Puzzle of Imaginative Resistance’, Journal of Philosophy, 94: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gendler, T.S. (forthcoming) 2008. ‘Alief and Belief’, Journal of Philosophy.Google Scholar
  18. Haidt, J. 2007. ‘The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology’, Science, 316: 998–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haidt, J. and Graham, J. 2007. ‘When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize’, Social Justice Research, 20: 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haidt, J. and Joseph, C. 2007. ‘The Moral Mind: How Five Sets of Innate Intuitions Guide the Development of Many Culture-Specific Virtues, and Perhaps Even Modules’ in P. Carruthers, Laurence, S. and Stich, S. (eds), The Innate Mind, Vol. 3: Foundations and the Future, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 367–391.Google Scholar
  21. Harold, J. Unpublished. ‘The Value of Fictional Worlds; Or, Why, Lord of the Rings is Worth Reading. Google Scholar
  22. Harris, P. 2000. The Work of the Imagination, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Ichikawa, J. and Jarvis, B. (forthcoming) ‘Thought-experiment intuitions and truth in fiction’, _Philosophical Studies_.Google Scholar
  24. Leslie, A. 1994. ‘ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core Architecture and Domain Specificity’ in L. Hirschfeld and S. Gelman (eds), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, New York: Cambridge University Press, 119–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCloskey, M. 1983. ‘Intuitive Physics’, Scientific American, 248.4: 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meskin, A. and Weinberg, J.M. 2003. ‘Emotions, Fiction, and Cognitive Architecture’, British Journal of Aesthetics, 43: 18–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nichols, S. 2004. ‘Imagining and Believing: The Promise of a Single Code’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, Special Issue on Art, Mind, and Cognitive Science, 62: 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nichols, S. 2004. ‘Review of G. Currie and I. Ravenscroft, Recreative Minds’, Mind, 113: 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nichols, S. and Stich, S. 2000. ‘A cognitive theory of pretense’, Cognition, 74: 115–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stich, S. 1992. ‘What is a Theory of Mental Representation?’ Mind, 101: 243–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perkins, V.F. 1972. Film as Film, New York: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  32. Premack, D. 1990. ‘The Infant’s Theory of Self-Propelled Objects’, Cognition, 36: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scribner, S. 1977. ‘Modes of Thinking and Ways of Speaking: Culture and Logic Reconsidered’ in P.N. Johnson-Laird and P.C. Wason (eds), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science, New York: Cambridge University Press, 483–500.Google Scholar
  34. Singh, C. 2002. ‘When Physical Intuition Fails’, American Journal of Physics, 70.11: 1103–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sosa, E. forthcoming. ‘A Defense of Intuitions’ in M., Bishop and D. Murphy, (eds) Stich and His Critics, Oxford and Boston: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  36. Sripada, C. and Stich, S. 2007. ‘A Framework for the Psychology of Norms’ in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence and S. Stich (eds), Innateness and the Structure of the Mind, Volume 2, New York: Oxford University Press, 280–302.Google Scholar
  37. Stock, K. 2006. ‘Fiction and Psychological Insight’ in M. Kieran and D. McIver Lopes (eds), Knowing Art: Essays in Aesthetics and Epistemology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer, 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thelen, E. and Smith, L.B. 1994. A Dynamic Systems Approach to the Development of Cognition and Action, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Walton, K. 1978. ‘Fearing Fictions’, Journal of Philosophy, 75.1: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Warshow, R. 1964. The Immediate Experience, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Weinberg, J.M. and Meskin, A. 2005. ‘Imagine That’ in M. Kieran (ed.), Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art, Malden, MA: Blackwell, 222–235.Google Scholar
  43. Weinberg, J.M. and Meskin, A. 2006. ‘Puzzling over the Imagination: Philosophical Problems and Architectural Solutions’ in S. Nichols (ed.), The Architecture of the Imagination, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weinberg, J., Nichols, S., and Stich, S. 2001. ‘Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions’, Philosophical Topics, 29: 429–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Jonathan M. Weinberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jonathan M. Weinberg

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations