Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

East Asia’s Economic Integration pp 184–221Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Structural Change in Intermediate, Consumption and Capital Goods Trade During Economic Integration: the EU Experience

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: IDE-JETRO Series ((IDE))

Abstract

The East Asian integration process was preceded by another integration process. From the early 1950s onwards, an increasing number of European countries started to tear down mutual tariff walls and reduce non-tariff barriers to trade. This chapter aims to analyse the consequences of earlier integration in Europe, and to give insights into potential future effects of similar tendencies in East Asia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Balassa, B. (1966). ‘Tariff Reduction and Trade in Manufactures among Industrial Countries’, American Economic Review, 56: 466–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balassa, B. (1975). ‘Trade Creation and Trade Diversion in the European Common Market: an Appraisal of the Evidence’, in B. Balassa (ed.), European Economic Integration, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyers, W. B. (1976). ‘Empirical Identification of Key Sectors: Some Further Evidence’, Environment and Planning A, 8: 231–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boomsma, P. and J. Oosterhaven (1992). ‘A Double-entry Method for the Construction of Bi-regional Input-Output Tables’, Journal of Regional Science 32: 269–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brakman, S., H. Garretsen and M. van Marrewijk (2002). An Introduction to Geographical Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E. (1997). ‘In Vindication of the Ghosh Model: a Reinterpretation as a Price Model’, Journal of Regional Science, 37: 629–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E. (2002). ‘Interregional Multipliers: Looking Backward and Forward’, Regional Studies, 36, 2: 125–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E. and A. R. Hoen (1999). ‘Deflation of Input–Output Tables from the User’s Point of View’, Review of Income and Wealth, 44: 111–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E. and J. A. van der Linden (1997). ‘Sectoral and Spatial Linkages in the EC Production Structure’, Journal of Regional Science, 37, 2: 235–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietzenbacher, E., J. A. van der Linden and A. E. Steenge (1993). ‘The Regional Extraction Method: EC Input–Output Comparisons’, Economic Systems Research, 5, 2: 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. and V. D. Norman (1980). Theory of International Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. and J. E. Stiglitz (1977). ‘Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity’, American Economic Review, 67: 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (1983). National Accounts ESA, Input—Output Tables 1975. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (1986). National Accounts ESA, Input—Output Tables 1980. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eurostat (1990). External Trade Statistics: User’s Guide. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., P. R. Krugman and A. J. Venables (1999). The Spatial Economy, Cities, Regions and International Trade, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubel, H. G. and P. J. Lloyd (1971). ‘The Empirical Measurement of Intra-Industry Trade’, The Economic Record, 47: 494–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heston, A., R. Summers and B. Aten (2006). Penn World Table Version 6.2, Center for International Comparisons of Production, Income and Prices at the University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1958). The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoen, A. R. (1999). ‘An Input–Output Analysis of European Integration’, PhD, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoen, A. R. and J. Oosterhaven (2006). ‘On the Measurement of Comparative Advantage’, Annals of Regional Science, 40: 677–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1951). ‘Interregional and Regional Input–Output Analysis: a Model of a Space Economy’, Review of Economics and Statistics, 33: 318–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1956). Location and Space-Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemin, A. and A. Sapir (1988). ‘European Integration or World Integration?’ Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 124: 127–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. P. (1976). ‘The Measurement of Hirschmanian Linkages’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90: 323–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1980). ‘Scale Economies, Product Differentiation, and International Trade’, American Economic Review, 17: 950–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R. (1991). Geography and Trade. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, J. A. van der (1998). ‘Interdependence and Specialisation in the European Union: Intercountry Input–Output Analysis and European Integration’, PhD, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, J. A. van der and J. Oosterhaven (1995). ‘European Community Inter-country Input–Output Relations: Construction Method and Main Results for 1965–1985’, Economic Systems Research, 7, 3: 249–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden, J. A. van der and J. Oosterhaven (2000). ‘Specialisation and Concentration in the European Union, 1965–85’, in J. Bröcker and H. Herrmann (eds), Spatial Change and Interregional Flows in the Integrating Europe, Berlin: Physica Verlag: 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linden, J. A. van der, J. Oosterhaven, F. A. Cuello, G. J. D. Hewings and M. Sonis (2000). ‘Fields of Influence of Productivity Change in EC Intercountry Input–Output Tables, 1970–80’, Environment & Planning A, 32, 7: 1287–1305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayes, D. G. (1978). ‘The Effects of Economic Integration on Trade’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 17: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J. (1984). ‘A Family of Square and Rectangular Interregional Input– Output Tables and Models’, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 14: 565–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J. (1988). ‘On the Plausibility of the Supply-Driven Input–Output Model’, Journal of Regional Science, 28: 201–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J. (1995). ‘Changing Specialisation and Interdependency of EC Economies 1959–1975’, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 1, 1: 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J. (1996). ‘Leontief versus Ghoshian Price and Quantity Models’, Southern Economic Journal, 62, 3: 750–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oosterhaven, J., D. Stelder and S. Inomata (2007), ‘Evaluation of Non-Survey International IO Construction Methods with the Asian-Pacific Input-Output Table’. IDE Discussion Paper 114, Chiba: IDE/JETRO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, P. N. (1956). Studies in Intersectoral Relations, Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schilderinck, J. H. F. (1984). ‘Interregional Structure of the European Community, Part II: Interregional Input–Output Tables, 1959, 1965, 1970 and 1975’, research memorandum, Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M. and G. J. D. Hewings (1992) ‘Coefficient Change in Input—Output Models: Theory and Applications’, Economic Systems Research, 4: 143–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonis, M., J. Oosterhaven and G. J. D. Hewing (1993). ‘Spatial Economic Structure and Structural Changes in the European Common Market: Feedback Loop Input–Output Analysis’, Economic Systems Research, 5, 2: 173–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stelder, T. M. (2005). ‘Regions and Cities: Five Essays on Interregional and Spatial Agglomeration Modelling’, PhD, University of Groningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassert, G. (1968). ‘Zür Bestimmung Strategische Sektoren mit Hilfe van Input-Output Analysis’, Jahrbüc her für Nationalökonomie und Statistik, 182: 211–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables, A. J. (1996). ‘Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries’, International Economic Review, 37: 341–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Bart Los
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Oosterhaven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), Japan

    Daisuke Hiratsuka (Director General of the Development Studies Center) (Director General of the Development Studies Center)

  2. Keio University, Japan

    Fukunari Kimura (Professor in the Faculty of Economics) (Professor in the Faculty of Economics)

Copyright information

© 2008 Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Los, B., Oosterhaven, J. (2008). Structural Change in Intermediate, Consumption and Capital Goods Trade During Economic Integration: the EU Experience. In: Hiratsuka, D., Kimura, F. (eds) East Asia’s Economic Integration. IDE-JETRO Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230227309_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation