Skip to main content

Imagination and Reason: An Ethics of Interpretation for a Cosmopolitan Age

  • Chapter
Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future

Abstract

The realm of cosmopolitics and international relations, like the realms of right and ethics, is viewed by the liberal tradition as a domain of rational law. Kant’s aspiration for cosmopolitics was a sphere in which international law, consistent with the dictates of reason, would express the will of every rational being unbiased by geographical and local contingencies and moral irrelevancies.1 The Enlightenment project, in so many ways bound to the political device of the social contract, still looms large over any attempt to understand and construct institutions and procedures for those issues which affect individuals, as individuals yet require transnational cooperation and enforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berlin, I. (1997a) Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1997b) ‘The Divorce between the Sciences and the Humanities’ in (ed.), Against the Current: Essays in the History of Ideas, London: Pimlico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceram, C. (2001) Gods, Graves and Scholars: The Story of Archaeology, London: Phoenix Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, P. and Robbins, B. (eds) (1998) Cosmopolitics, London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W. (1961) Meaning in History; W. Dilthey’s Thoughts on History and Society, London: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H. G. (2004) Truth and Method, London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grassi, E. (1990) Vico and Humanism: Essays on Vico, Heidegger, and Rhetoric, New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampshire, S. (1999) Justice is Conflict, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1993) ‘Letter on Humanism’ in Martin Heidegger, Farrell Krell, D. (eds), Basic Writings, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herder, J. G. (1968) Reflections on the Philosophy of the History of Mankind, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herodotus (1936) The History of Herodotus, New York: Tudor Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes, T. (1991) Leviathan, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2004) Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1996) The Metaphysics of Morals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1993) Critique of Pure Reason: A Revised and Expanded Translation based on Meiklejohn, London: J.M. Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1991a) ‘Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose’ in H. S. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1991b) Kant: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1991c) ‘On the Agreement between Politics and Morality under the Transcendental Concept of Public Right’ in H. S. Reiss (ed.), Kant: Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1974) Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, R. (2001) ‘Taliban Order all Statues Destroyed’, The Guardian 27 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulhall, S. and Swift, A. (1996) Liberals and Communitarians, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1997) The Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 5, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1999) ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’ in J. Rawls (ed.), Collected Papers, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1993) Political Liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N. (2003) ‘Cosmopolitanism’ in R. Axtmann (ed.), Understanding Democratic Politics, London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1998) ‘Justice as a Larger Loyalty’ in P. R. B. Cheah (ed.), Cosmopolitics, London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.J. (1997) The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. (1982a) ‘The First New Science’ in L. Pompa (ed.), Vico: Selected Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. (1982b) ‘On the Ancient Wisdom of the Italians Taken from the Origins of the Latin Language’ in L. Pompa (ed.), Vico: Selected Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. (1982c) Vico: Selected Writings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vico, G. (1970) The New Science of Giambattista Vico, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1987) Interpretation and Social Criticism, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2007 David Rose

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, D. (2007). Imagination and Reason: An Ethics of Interpretation for a Cosmopolitan Age. In: Morgan, D., Banham, G. (eds) Cosmopolitics and the Emergence of a Future. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210684_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics