Abstract
France developed a set of political institutions at both national and subnational levels to express the idea of the one and indivisible nation-state. The dominant state ideology and tradition between the French Revolution at the end of the 18th century and the period following the Second World War emphasized centralization, standardization and uniformity.1 This has been true, with some nuances, until 1982, whatever the regime in place: restored monarchy (1814–1818), Second Republic (1848–1852), Second Empire (1852–1870), Third Republic (1870–1940), Vichy Regime (1940–1945), Fourth Republic (1946–1958), and the current Fifth Republic (1958–). The obsessive insistence on political and administrative centralization on the part of French political leaders, particularly those in the radical, republican and socialist traditions, however, betrays a deep-seated unease within the political class that is related to the continuing diversity of French society. Eugen Weber’s classic work Peasants into Frenchmen shows how, at the end of the 19th and beginning of the 20th centuries, the task of creating a culturally and sociologically homogeneous French people was still far from accomplished despite the adherence of the majority of these same French people to the institutions of the Republic. Even today, France is still characterized by its great cultural, economic, social and cultural diversity. To a large extent, the centralizing institutions that have been in place for almost 200 years were an attempt to overcome this. The more extreme Jacobins such as Émile Combes were terrified that the great diversity, associated with provincial reactionary forces such as the Church and the nobility, would rise up and destroy the gains of the Revolution and the secular republic (la République laïque). But, underneath the institutions, French society continued to exist as it had done for centuries, since the bulk of its population were peasants living the same lives as their forebears.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
On the notion of ‘state tradition’ see K. Dyson, The state tradition in Western Europe: a study of an idea and institution (Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1980)
K. Dyson, and for a more contemporary application of the notion: J. Loughlin and B. G. Peters: J. Loughlin and B. G. Peters, ‘State Traditions, Administrative Reform and Regionalization’, in M. Keating and J. Loughlin (eds), The Political Economy of Regionalism, 1997, pp. 4–62.
F. Braudel, L’identité de la France, op. cit.; J-. F. Gravier, Paris et le désert français ( Paris: Flammarion, 1947 );
M. Crozier, La société bloquée (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1970 );
J-P. Worms, ‘Le préfet et ses notables’, Sociologie du travail, vol. 3 (1966), pp. 249–275;
M. Crozier and J-C. Thoenig, ‘La régulation des systèmes organisées complexes’, Revue Française de Sociologie, vol. 16, no. 1 (1975), pp. 3–32;
P. Grémion, Le pouvoir périphérique ( Paris: Les Editions du Seuil, 1976 );
E. Todd, La Nouvelle France (Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1988 );
H. Le Bras and E. Todd, L’Invention de la France: atlas anthropologique et politique ( Paris: Librairie Générale Française, 1981 ).
C. Debbasch and J-M. Pontier, La société française ( Paris: Dalloz, 1989 ), pp. 623–654.
M. Parodi, L’Economie et la Société française de 1945 à 1970 ( Paris: Armand Colin, 1971 ).
See J. Loughlin, ‘Regionalist and Federalist Movements in Contemporary France’, in M. Burgess (ed.), Comparative Federalism and Federation ( London: Croom Helm, 1986 )
J. Loughlin, and, for the interwar period, J. Loughlin, ‘Personalism and Federalism in Inter-war France’, in P. Stirk (ed.), The Context of European Unity: the Inter-war Period ( London: Francis Pinter, 1988 ), pp. 188–200.
Alan Milward, The European Rescue of the Nation-State, 2nd edition ( London: Routledge, 2000 ).
See D. E. Ashford, ‘In search of the Etat Providence’, in J. F. Hollifield and G. Ross (eds), Searching for the New France ( New York and London: Routledge, 1991 ).
G. Esping-Anderson, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism ( Cambridge: Polity, 1990 ).
T. H. Marshall, Citizenship and social class: and other essays ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1950 ).
J. Loughlin, ‘The “Transformation” of Governance: New Directions in Policy and Politics’. Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 50, no. 1, March 2004, pp. 8–22.
Mendras, H. (1994) La Seconde Révolution française 1965–1984 ( Paris: Gallimard, 1994 )
D. L. Hanley and A. P. Kerr (eds), May’68: coming of age ( Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1989 ).
A. Touraine, The Voice and the Eye: An Analysis of Social Movements ( New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981 ).
D. S. Bell and B. Criddle, The French Socialist Party: The Emergence of a Party of Government, 2nd edition ( Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988 ).
A. Cole, François Mitterrand: a study in political leadership (London; New York: Routledge, 1994.).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2007 John Loughlin
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loughlin, J. (2007). The ‘Trente Glorieuses’ (1945–1975) and their Aftermath. In: Subnational Government. French Politics, Society and Culture Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210622_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230210622_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-43244-8
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-21062-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)