Abstract
Romantic fragments, although readily identifiable, are as diffuse in kind as in form. Romanticism’s fascination with the fragmentary is mani- fest in numerous works that are either textually fragmented (whether by dint of design or accident) or complete literary forms that treat ruins as a central subject. Interest in the fragment in the period trans- gresses traditional generic boundaries. This transcendence of formal categories necessitated the exclusion of Romantic fragments from Stuart Curran’s survey of Poetic Form and British Romanticism and warranted their central place in Marjorie Levinson’s study of The Romantic Frag- ment Poem.1 Avoiding certain formal issues, Levinson’s historicising method places poetic fragments of the Romantic period within their wider ideological, cultural and biographical context as a means of legit- imatising these incomplete textual forms. Levinson’s historicist sense of the social, cultural and political horizons of the nineteenth century regulates the dynamic between the author’s text and the reader, but occludes those peculiar atemporal demands of a Romantic culture of posterity.2 Breaking with this historicising tendency, this chapter shares an affinity with Balachandra Rajan’s thematic reflections in The Form of the Unfinished and focuses on anachronistic posthumous exchanges between deceased author and future reader.3
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Marjorie Levinson, The Romantic Fragment: A Critique of Form (Chapel Hill: North Carolina University Press, 1986), p. ix.
Discussed in Andrew Bennett, Romantic Poets and the Culture of Posterity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999)
Lucy Newlyn, Reading, Writing, and Romanticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
Balachandra Rajan, The Form of the Unfinished: English Poetics from Spenser to Pound (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1985).
Soren Kierkegaard, Either/Or: A Fragment of Life, trans, by Alastair Hannay (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1992), p. 33.
Soren Kierkegaard, The Point of View for My Work as an Author, ed. and trans, by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998).
Friedrich Nietzsche, ‘On Truth and Lie in the Extra-Moral Sense’, in The Portable Nietzsche, ed. by Walter Kaufmann (Harmondsworth: Viking-Penguin, 1982), p. 46.
Paul de Man, The Rhetoric of Romanticism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1984).
Friedrich Nietzsche, Human All Too Human: A Book for Free Spirits, trans, by R. J. Hollingdale, introduction, by Richard Schact (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), pp. 96–7.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2007 Mark Sandy
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sandy, M. (2007). ‘Ruinous Perfection’: Reading Authors and Writing Readers in Romantic Fragments. In: Rawes, A. (eds) Romanticism and Form. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230206144_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230206144_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54434-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-20614-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)