Abstract
‘Byron’s poetry is the most striking example I know in literary history of the creative role which poetic form can play’, Auden wrote in ‘The Shield of Perseus’.1 The question of what role, exactly, Byron’s ironically hailed ‘gentle reader’ plays in the reception of poetic form has been approached in a number of ways since the Romantic period. There have been studies of the economics and politics of reception and close analysis of various scenes of reception such as Lucy Newlyn’s examination of Romantic poets’ responses to hearing each other’s work.2 On a different front, profiles of the wider reading public have been constructed through analyses of guides and educational books to see how the ideal reader was envisaged while other scholars have traced the aesthetic horizons of the different groups that make up a readership, for example, women, children and working-class readers. Since Jon P. Klancher’s The Making of English Reading Audiences, 1790–1832 (1987), and Lee Erickson’s The Economy of Literary Form: English Literature and the Industrialization of Publishing, 1800–1850 (2000), particular attention has been paid to the shaping of readerly taste through the direction of the reviewers and editors. In diverse studies of the Romantic period, marginalia, literary table talk and memoirs have been scrutinised for what they can tell us of reactions to poems in the run up to, and immediate aftermath of, publication.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Lucy Newlyn, Reading, Writing, and Romanticism: The Anxiety of Reception (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000).
William St Clair, The Reading Nation in the Romantic Period (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), p. 5.
Gunnar Hansson, ‘Verbal Scales in Research on Response to Literature’, in Charles R. Cooper (ed.), Researching Responses to Literature and the Teaching of Literature: Points of Departure (Norwood: Ablex, 1985), pp. 212–32
Andrew Rutherford (ed.), Byron: The Critical Heritage (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970), p. 375.
Donald Reiman (ed.), The Romantics Reviewed: Contemporary Reviews of British Romantic Writers, Part B: Byron and Regency Society Poets, 5 vols (New York and London: Garland Publishing, 1972), IV, p. 1412.
Donald Wesling, The Chances of Rhyme: Device and Modernity (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1980), p. 50.
John Hookham Frere, The Monks and the Giants, ed. by R. D. Waller (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1926), p. 22.
Anne Barton, Byron, Don Juan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 17.
Jerome J. McGann, Don Juan in Context (London: John Murray, 1976), p. 96.
Samuel Johnson, Selected Writings, ed. by Patrick Cruttwell (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1988), p. 480.
Roger Lonsdale (ed.), The New Oxford Book of Eighteenth-Century Verse (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 115
Philip Hobsbaum, Metre, Rhythm and VerseForm (London: Routledge, 1996), p. 129.
Richard Teny, ‘Gray and Poetic Diction’, in W. B. Hutchings and William Ruddick (eds), Thomas Gray: Contemporary Essays (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 1993), pp. 73–110
Charles Lamb, Elia and the Last Essays of Elia, ed. by Jonathan Bate (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), p. 198.
For a recent view of this process, see Billy Collins, ‘Poetry, Pleasure and the Hedonist Reader’in David Citino (ed.), The Eye of the Poet: Six Views of the Art and Craft of Poetry (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002)
David Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, ed. by Nelson Pike (Indianapolis: Bobbs-MeniU, 1970), p. 38.
Georges Poulet, ‘Criticism and the Experience of Interiority’, in Jane P. Tompkins (ed.), Reader-Response Criticism from Formalism to Post-Structuralism (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980), pp. 41–49
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2007 Jane Stabler, Martin H. Fischer, Andrew Michael Roberts and Maria Nella Carminati
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stabler, J., Fischer, M.H., Roberts, A.M., Carminati, M.N. (2007). ‘What Constitutes a Reader?’ Don Juan and the Changing Reception of Romantic Form. In: Rawes, A. (eds) Romanticism and Form. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230206144_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230206144_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-54434-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-20614-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature & Performing Arts CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)