Abstract
As detailed in the introduction, Beatriz Sarlo, Nelly Richard, and other scholars have underscored the connection between contemporary media’s unheralded penetration of daily life, the invidious growth of consumer culture, and the waning of historical sensibilities. In countries like Argentina and Chile where the dominant neoliberal politics have consecrated the work of truth commissions as the sole, official means to deal with the dictatorial past, these intellectuals (along with activists and artists) have worried publicly about transmitting the lessons of recent history to a younger generation more concerned about watching old 1970s reruns on retro cable channels or downloading the latest video games. In Brazil, efforts to recall the repressive actions of the military regime (1964–85) have been even more difficult. As noted by Leslie A. Payne, until the 1990s there was an “absence of institutional mechanisms for addressing past human rights violations” and human-rights activists have found it difficult to “devise creative methods of overcoming security-force and societal silence.”1 While Payne argues that the Brazilian media has not sensationalized the past, film scholar Luiz Zanin Oricchio suggests that the rise of an individualistic (vs. collective) and generally depoliticized ethos in the 1990s made it difficult to make films about power dynamics and to discuss the years of dictatorship in substantive ways.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Leslie A. Payne, Unsettling Accounts: Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence (Durham: Duke University Press, 2008), 9, 182. In 1995, newly elected President Fernando Henrique Cardoso “officially acknowledged the regime’s responsibility for past violations and established an indemnity program for victims’ families and survivors of military-regime repression” (176). While “[a]ctivists have sought justice in local and regional courts,” only in 2004 did “human-rights violations become a federal offense through a constitutional amendment (9, 180).
Jameson, The Geopolitical Aesthetic: Cinema and Space in the World System (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1992), 41. His take on the thriller is slightly different from that of Hennebelle. Although critical of such films’ tendency toward emotional appeal, Jameson nonetheless seems to recognize their sociopolitical function.
Ariel Dorfman, “Final and First Words about Death and the Maiden,” in Other Septembers, Many Americas: Selected Provocations, 1980–2004 (New York: Seven Stories Press, 2004), 187; Millán, La memoria agitada, 276–78, 280.
Andreas Huyssen, Twilight Memories: Marking Time in a Culture of America (New York: Routledge, 1995), 5–7;
Vivian Sobchack, “Introduction: History Happens,” in The Persistence of History: Cinema, Television, and the Modern Event. New York: Routledge, 1996), 4–5.
Copyright information
© 2011 Laura Podalsky
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Podalsky, L. (2011). Thrilling Histories: Replaying the Past in Genre Films. In: The Politics of Affect and Emotion in Contemporary Latin American Cinema. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230120112_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230120112_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29223-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-12011-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)