Skip to main content

Introduction: Character, Self, and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment

  • Chapter
Character, Self, and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment
  • 491 Accesses

Abstract

“Character” has a long history and a dense literature. In both its general and particular manifestations it permeates the writing of the Greek and Roman classical authors that formed the basis of eighteenth-century education and by which cultural standards were set. Ethical norms, both public and personal, deferred to the authority and the examples of Tacitus, Cicero, and Seneca. The dominant mode of character writing in the West at the beginning of the eighteenth century was the Theophrastan ethical type, derived from short studies of Greek personalities construed by Theophrastus, a student of Aristotle. Theophrastus’s exemplary figures included the Boor, the Loquacious Man, the Social Parasite, the Miser. A sixteenth-century text of Theophrastan fragments prompted English sketches such as Samuel Butler’s Characters of 1667–79 (published in 1759) and the Caractères of La Bruyère. Character in this context is defined by public manifestation; it is a functional and rhetorical product of characterization, character-as-represented either by oneself or by another. These were portraits—images—in words of ethical types. Alexander Pope’s Moral Epistles, for example, took a broadly Theophrastan line: the “Argument” to the first, “Of the Knowledge and Characters of MEN,” outlines the semantic range of the term:

Some Peculiarity in every man, characteristic to himself, yet varying from himself…Some few Characters plain, but in general confounded, dissembled, or inconsistent…The same man utterly different in different places and seasons…No judging of the Motives from the actions…Yet to form Characters, we can only take the strongest actions of a man’s life, and try to make them agree: The utter uncertainty of this, from Nature itself and from Policy…Actions, Passions, Opinions, Manners, Humours, or Principles all subject to change…It only remains to find (if we can) his Ruling Passion.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, vol. 1 of The Glasgow Edition of the Works and Correspondence of Adam Smith (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1984), 317.

    Google Scholar 

  2. On TMS, see also Nicholas T. Phillipson, Adam Smith: An Enlightened Life (London: Allen Lane, 2010), chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gordon Graham, “The Ambition of Scottish Philosophy,” The Monist: Scottish Philosophy 90 (April 2007): 154–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. David Hume, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 3rd ed., ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge, rev. ed. P.H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975), 86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Istvan Hont and Michael Ignatieff, eds., Wealth and Virtue: The Shaping of Political Economy in the Scottish Enlightenment (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Hume, A Treatise of Human Nature, 3 vols., ed. L.A. Selby-Bigge (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978), xxiii. Subsequent references by page number in the text.

    Google Scholar 

  7. See, for example, George Turnbull, Principles of Moral and Christian Philosophy: Philosophical Works and Correspondence of George Turnbull, 2 vols., ed. Alexander Broadie (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005), 1:445–46.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas Dixon, From Passions to Emotions: The Creation of a Secular Psychological Category (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 64–65.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Malebranche’s work was the first of four titles Hume advised that his friend Michael Ramsey should read before encountering the Treatise. See Susan James, “Sympathy and Comparison: Two Principles of Human Nature,” in Impressions of Hume, ed. M. Frasca-Spada and P.J.E. Kail (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005), 107;

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. and Peter J.E. Kail, “On Hume’s Appropriation of Malebranche: Causation and Self,” European Journal of Philosophy 16, no. 1 (April 2008): 63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. James, “Sympathy and Comparison,” 107. See also Charles J. McCracken, Malebranche and British Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983), chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  12. On Malebranche’s importance for the development of Hume’s thought, see also John A. Passmore, Hume’s Intentions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1952), 86–89, 92. Passmore, like many other critics, addresses inconsistencies in Hume’s thinking that it is not appropriate to pursue here.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anthony LaVopa, “Malebranche and the Bel Esprit” (unpublished manuscript, n.d.); see also Michael Moriarty, Early Modern French Thought: The Age of Suspicion (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003), 192, 250.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Jerrold E. Seigel, The Idea of the Self: Thought and Experience in Western Europe Since the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 198.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Jerome B. Schneewind, The Invention of Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998), 338–42.

    Google Scholar 

  16. On two relevant theorists, Christian Thomasius and Johann Jacob Schmauss, see, for example, Thomas Ahnert, “Epicureanism and the Transformation of Natural Law in the Early German Enlightenment,” in Epicurus in the Enlightenment, ed. N. Leddy and A. Lifshitz (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2009), 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Besides Seigel’s Idea of the Self, see also Charles Taylor, Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dror Wahrman, The Making of the Modern Self: Identity and Culture in Eighteenth-Century England (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2004);

    Google Scholar 

  19. Deirdre S. Lynch, The Economy of Character: Novels, Market Culture, and the Business of Inner Meaning (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1998);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sarah Knott and Barbara Taylor, eds., Women, Gender, and Enlightenment, 1650–1850 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  21. There is a large body of scholarship on Scottish university developments during the eighteenth century. See, for example, Roger L. Emerson, Professors, Patronage and Politics: The Aberdeen Universities in the Eighteenth Century (Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press, 1992);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Richard B. Sher, Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment: The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1985);

    Google Scholar 

  23. Robert D. Anderson, M. Lynch, and N. Phillipson, The University of Edinburgh: An Illustrated History (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. See Charles Taylor, A Secular Age (Cambridge, MA, and London: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2007), chap. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard A. Kleer, “Final Causes in Adam Smith’s Theory of Moral Sentiments,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 33, no. 2 (April 1995): 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stephen J. McKenna, Adam Smith: The Rhetoric of Propriety (Albany: State University of New York Press, 2006), 55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See, for example, Neil McKendrick, John Brewer, and J.H. Plumb, The Birth of a Consumer Society: The Commercialization of Eighteenth-Century England (London: Europa, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paul Langford, A Polite and Commercial People: England 1727–1783 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989);

    Google Scholar 

  29. Roy Porter, English Society in the Eighteenth Century (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1982);

    Google Scholar 

  30. John Brewer and Roy Porter, eds., Consumption and the World of Goods (London: Routledge, 1993);

    Google Scholar 

  31. John Brewer, The Pleasures of the Imagination: English Culture in the Eighteenth Century (New York: HarperCollins, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  32. David Hume, “An Abstract of a Book Lately Published, Entitled, A Treatise of Human Nature, &c.,” in A Treatise of Human Nature, ed. David Fate Norton and Mary Norton (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000; repr., 2004), 414 [Hume’s italics].

    Google Scholar 

  33. For an expanded version of this account, see Susan Manning, Fragments of Union: Making Connections in Scottish and American Writing (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), chap. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Phillipson, “Politics, Politeness and the Anglicisation of Early Eighteenth-Century Scottish Culture,” in Scotland and England 1286–1815, ed. Roger A. Mason (Edinburgh: John Donald, 1987), 226–46.

    Google Scholar 

  35. David Hume, “Essay I. Of Essay-Writing,” in Essays: Moral, Political, and Literary, ed. Eugene F. Miller (Indianapolis: Liberty Classics, 1987), 534–35.

    Google Scholar 

  36. See, for example, Lynch, Economy of Character, 16; see also Carol Kay, Political Constructions: Defoe, Richardson, and Sterne in Relation to Hobbes, Hume, and Burke (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1988),

    Google Scholar 

  37. and Ian Hunter, “Reading Character,” Southern Review 16, no. 2 (1983): 226–43.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tobias Smollett, “Dedication,” in The Adventures of Ferdinand, Count Fathom, ed. Damian Grant (London and New York: Oxford University Press, 1971), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  39. See, for example, chap. 5 of Phillipson’s Adam Smith; J.G.A. Pocock, Barbarism and Religion, vol. 2 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pts. 2 and 3;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Mark Salber Phillips, Society and Sentiment: Genres of Historical Writing in Britain, 1740–1820 (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000), chap. 7;

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. David Spadafora, The Idea of Progress in Eighteenth-Century Britain (New Haven, CT, and London: Yale University Press, 1990), chap. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Older works that are still useful include Gladys Bryson, Man and Society: The Scottish Enquiry of the Eighteenth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1945),

    Book  Google Scholar 

  43. and Harro Höpfl, “From Savage to Scotsman: Conjectural History in the Scottish Enlightenment,” Journal of British Studies 17, no. 2 (1978): 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Colin Kidd, “Constitutions and Character in the Eighteenth-Century British World,” in From Republican Polity to National Community: Reconsiderations of Enlightenment Political Thought, ed. Paschalis M. Kitromilides, Studies on Voltaire and the Eighteenth Century, ed. Jonathan Mallinson (Oxford: Voltaire Foundation, 2003), 40–61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2011 Thomas Ahnert and Susan Manning

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ahnert, T., Manning, S. (2011). Introduction: Character, Self, and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment. In: Ahnert, T., Manning, S. (eds) Character, Self, and Sociability in the Scottish Enlightenment. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119956_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230119956_1

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28869-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11995-6

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics