Central Asia: Pragmatism in Action

  • Luca Anceschi
  • Shahram Akbarzadeh


The Obama administration has inherited a difficult case in Central Asia. Once shunned by successive U.S. administrations for its poor record on human rights and its geostrategic position that was assumed to be peripheral to U.S. interests, Central Asia was thrust on the U.S. foreign policy radar in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks. Security concerns, followed closely by establishing access routes to the region’s fossil fuels, have dominated the minds of policy makers ever since. In between these concerns has been the nagging question of political reform, something the Central Asian leadership has been disinclined to adopt. The Bush administration tried to find a balance between competing objectives in relation to Central Asia. Generally emphasizing the security aspect of the relationship, the Bush administration peppered its public statements on Central Asia with the occasional reference to the normative concepts of good governance and rule of law. The latter may have been mere window dressing, but such reference was a reminder of an inherent tension between pragmatism and idealism in the foreign policy of the United States. This chapter traces the ebbs and flows of these competing goals and examines the responses formulated by the Obama administration. It is argued that the Obama administration has continued to regard security and access to fossil fuels as Washington’s primary objectives while pushing concerns with normative aspects of foreign policy further to the background.


Foreign Policy Good Governance Bush Administration Strategic Interest Obama Administration 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Stephen Blank, “The United States and Central Asia,” in Central Asian Security: The New International Context, ed. Roy Allison and Lena Jonson, 140–145 (London: Royal Institute of International Affairs, and Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. See also Fiona Hill, “Une Stratégie Incertaine: La Politique des Etats-Unis dans le Caucase et en Asie Centrale Depuis 1991,” Politique Étrangère 66, no. 1 (2001): 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    Pauline Jones Luong and Erika Weinthal, “New Friends, New Fears in Central Asia,” Foreign Affairs 81, no. 2 (2002): 69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 3.
    Annette Bohr, “Central Asia: Responding to the Multi-vectoring Game,” in America and a Changed World: A Question of Leadership, ed. Robin Niblett (London: Wiley-Blackwell/Chatham House, 2010), 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    U.S. House Committee on International Relations, “Central Asia: Terrorism, Religious Extremism, and Regional Stability” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, October 29, 2003, Serial no. 108-71), 10 (emphasis in original).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    U.S. House Committee on International Relations, “US Security Policy in Central Asia (Part 1)” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, October 27, 2005, Serial no. 109-132), 9.Google Scholar
  7. U.S. House Committee on International Relations, “Assessing Energy and Security Issues in Central Asia” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, July 25, 2006, Serial no. 109-219), 9.Google Scholar
  8. 6.
    B. Lynn Pascoe’s testimony in U.S. House Committee on International Relations, “Uzbekistan: The Key to Success in Central Asia?” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 2004, Serial no. 108-126), 16.Google Scholar
  9. 7.
    Data calculated on figures available from Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, “U.S. Assistance to Europe and Eurasia: Fact Sheets 2009,” (Accessed on September 18, 2010).Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    Shahram Akbarzadeh, Uzbekistan and the United States: Authoritarianism, Islamism and Washington’s Security Agenda (London and New York: Zed Books, 2005), 82.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Luca Anceschi, “Integrating Domestic Factors and Foreign Policy Making: The Cases of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan,” Central Asian Survey 29, no. 2 (2010): 151.Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Condoleezza Rice, “Remarks at Eurasian National University,” October 13, 2005 (Accessed September 18, 2010).Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    John Heathershaw, “Worlds Apart: The Making and Remaking of Geopolitical Space in the US -Uzbekistan Strategic Partnership,” Central Asian Survey 26, no. 1 (2007): 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    Jim Nichol, “Kyrgyzstan and the Status of the US Manas Airbase: Context and Implications,” (U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, CRS Report R46054, 2009), 9.Google Scholar
  15. 18.
    Reuters, “Obama Confident July 2011 Start for Afghanistan Pullout,” May 12, 2010 (Accessed on September 18, 2010).Google Scholar
  16. 19.
    International Crisis Group (ICG), Central Asia: Migrants and the Economic Crisis, Asia Report no. 183, January 5, 2010, p. 2.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    World Bank, The Crisis Hits HomeStress-Testings Households in Europe and Central Asia (Washington, DC: World Bank, 2010), 13.Google Scholar
  18. 22.
    George A. Krol’s testimony in U.S. House Committee on International Relations, “Reevaluating US Policy in Central Asia” (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, December 15, 2009, Serial no. 111-433), 14–15.Google Scholar
  19. 24.
    Joshua Kucera, “Obama Administration Adopting New Views on Possible Security Threats in Central Asia and the Caucasus,” Eurasianet, February 16, 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 26.
    Marat Shaikhutdinov, “Central Asia in the Foreign Policy Strategy of Barack Obama’s Administration: Results and Prospects,” American Foreign Policy Interests 32, no. 2 (2010): 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 28.
    See Merhat Sharipzan, “Obama Victory Sparks Hops for Change in U.S. Policy in Central Asia,” RFE/RL Feature Article, November 7, 2008.Google Scholar
  22. 29.
    see Roman Muzalevsky, “US-Central Asian Relations: Going beyond Afghanistan,” Central Asian Caucasus Institute Analyst, January 20, 2010.Google Scholar
  23. See Jim Nichol, “Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for US Interests” (U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, CRS Report RL33458, 2010), 25.Google Scholar
  24. 33.
    ICG, Kyrgyzstan: A Hollow Regime Collapses (Asia Briefing 102, April 2010), 2–4.Google Scholar
  25. 34.
    On this note, see the minimal attention devoted by the assistant secretary of state Robert O. Blake to human rights in “Broadening Cooperation between the United States and Kyrgyzstan,” (Accessed on September 18, 2010).Google Scholar
  26. 35.
    Ariel Cohen, “What’s at Stake in Kyrgyzstan? Russia is Rolling Back George W. Bush’s Eurasian Advances,” Wall Street Journal, April 14, 2010.Google Scholar
  27. 37.
    Jim Nichol, “The April 2010 Coup in Kyrgyzstan and Its Aftermath: Context and Implications for US Interests” (U.S. Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, CRS Report R41178, 2010), 11.Google Scholar
  28. 38.
    Roza Otunbayeva, quoted in “What the Obama Administration Can Learn from Kyrgyzstan,” Washington Post, April 17, 2010, p. A12.Google Scholar
  29. 40.
    Erica Marat, The Military and the State in Central Asia—From Red Army to Independence (Abingdon, England, and New York: Routledge, 2010), 108–110.Google Scholar
  30. 41.
    Stephen J. Blank, Challenges and Opportunities for the Obama Administration in Central Asia (Carlisle, PA: Strategic Studies Institute, 2009), 16.Google Scholar
  31. 43.
    Robert O. Blake Jr., “Remarks on the Occasion of Commencement of Kazakhstan’s OSCE Chairmanship, January 20, 2010,” (Accessed on September 18, 2010).Google Scholar
  32. 44.
    James B. Steinberg, “Remarks with Kazakh Foreign Minister Saudabayev, July 16, 2010,” (Accessed on September 18, 2010).Google Scholar
  33. 47.
    Richard L. Morningstar, “Remarks at the Center for American Progress: 2010 Outlook for Eurasian Energy, January 28, 2010,” (Accessed on September 18, 2010).Google Scholar
  34. 48.
    International Monetary Fund, “Republic of Kazakhstan—Staff Report for the 2010 Article IV Consultation,” July 29, 2010, p. 23.Google Scholar
  35. Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, “U.S.-Kazakhstan Trade Facts,”; Kazakhstan Oil and Gas Report, Third Quarter 2010.Google Scholar
  36. 52.
    Joshua Kucera, “Caspian Energy: Washington Trying New Tack on Nabucco Project,” Eurasianet Business & Economics, February 1, 2010.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Shahram Akbarzadeh 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luca Anceschi
  • Shahram Akbarzadeh

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations