“The Wisdom of Practice”: Web 2.0 as a Cognitive and Community-Building Tool in Indonesia

  • Mary Burns
  • Petra Wiyakti Bodrogini
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)


The use of Web 2.0—the so-called read/write web (DiNucci, 1999; O’Reilly, 2005)—has increasingly found a home in the developed world as a vehicle for teacher and student learning. In much of the developing world, however, Web 2.0 applications remain little known and rarely used in teacher professional development and educational capacity building (Lim et al., 2003). In 2009–2010, Education Development Center (EDC) introduced a suite of Web 2.0 applications as part of an online professional development program for 60 technology trainers in six Indonesian provinces. The goal of this program was to help these technology trainers become effective school-based coaches who could then help teachers integrate classroom technology to support learner-centered instruction.


Online Learning Blended Learning Teacher Professional Development Coaching Program Economist Intelligence Unit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2). Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  2. Birnholtz, J. P. (2007). When do researchers collaborate: Toward a model of collaboration propensity. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2226–2239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burns, M. (2006, February). Improving student writing through online mentoring. Learning and Leading with Technology, 33(5), 38–47.Google Scholar
  4. Burns, M., & Dimock, K.V. (2007). Technology as a catalyst for school communities: Beyond boxes and bandwidth. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  5. Burns, M. (2009, June). Threading, tagging and higher order thinking: Using Web 2.0 applications with Indonesian teacher trainers. E-Learn. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  6. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991, Winter). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 15(3), 6–11.Google Scholar
  7. Cormode, G., & Krishnamurthy, B. (2008, February). Key differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 [PDF document]. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  8. Demirel, T., Duman, D., Incensu, S., & Göktas, Y. (2008, May). Using blogs (web logs) in higher education: Toys or tools? Proceedings of the 8th International Educational Technology Conference, Anadolu University (pp. 1114–1117).Google Scholar
  9. Dhanarajan, G. (2005, September). Sustaining knowledge societies through distance learning: The nature of the challenge. Keynote speech presented at the 19th Annual Conference of the Association of Asian Open Universities, Jakarta.Google Scholar
  10. Dillemans, R., Lowyck, J., Van der Perre, G., Claeys, C, & Elen, J. (1998). New technologies for learning: Contribution of ICT to innovation of education. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
  11. DiNucci, D. (1999). Fragmented future. Print: Design & new media, 53(4), 32. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  12. Economist Intelligence Unit (2008). E-readiness rankings 2008: Maintaining momentum. A white paper from the Economist Intelligence Unit [PDF document]. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  13. Gan, Z. (2009, February). Asian learners re-examined: An empirical study of language learning attitudes, strategies and motivation among mainland Chinese and Hong Kong students. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 30(1), 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hacking, I. (1999). The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hargadon, S. (2009, December 16). Educational networking: The important role Web 2.0 will play in education. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  16. Harris, S. (2009, June 29). Menimbang demokrasi, merajut optimism. Kompas. Retrieved from Scholar
  17. Holmes, B., Tangney, B., FitzGibbon, A., Savage, T, Meehan, S. (2001, March).Google Scholar
  18. Communal constructivism: Students constructing learning for as well as with others [PDF document]. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  19. Ibnu, S. (2007, March). Menyikapi KTSP sebagai tantangan untuk menyelenggarakan pembelajaran yang lebih baik. Journal Pendidikan Inovatif 2(2). Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  20. Jackson, C. K., & Bruegmann, E. (2009, July). Teaching students and teaching each other: The importance of peer learning for teachers. NBER working paper No. 15202. Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from Scholar
  21. Johnson, D., & Johnson, R. (1988). Learning together and alone. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  22. Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.Google Scholar
  23. Jung, I. S., & Sasaki, T. (2008, March). Toward effective and efficient e-moderation for blended learning. Journal of Educational Media Research, 14(2), 55–76.Google Scholar
  24. Kandel, E., & Lazear, E. (1992). Peer pressure and partnerships. Journal of Political Economy, 100(4), 801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  26. Kleiman, G. (2004). Meeting the need for high quality teachers: E-learning solutions [PDF document]. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  27. Latchem, C, & Jung, I. (2010). Distance and blended learning in Asia. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Leung, P. W. (2007). Introducing e-learning in a traditional Chinese context. In M. J. Keppell (Ed.), Instructional design: Case studies in communities of practice (pp. 275–295). Hershey, Pennsylvania: Information Science Reference.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lim, B., Leem, J. H., & Jung, I. S. (2003). Current status of cyber education in Korean higher education and quality control: The year of 2002. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 541–569.Google Scholar
  30. Lim, C. (2007, March). The current status and future prospects of corporate e-learning in Korea. International Review of Research in Open and Distance learning, 8(1). Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  31. Marjanovic, O. (1999). Learning and teaching in a synchronous collaborative environment. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 15(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McAlister, S., Ravenscroft, A., & Scanion, E. (2004). Combining interaction and context design to support collaborative argumentation using a tool for synchronous CMC. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 20(3), 194–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Millambiling, J. (2008, April 17) Making necessary adjustments: Teaching abroad in Indonesia [PDF document]. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  34. Moran, L., & Myringer, B. (1999). Flexible learning and university change. In K. Harry (Ed.), Higher education through Open and distance learning (pp. 57–71). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Morrison, C. (2010, June). Indonesia became Facebook’s third largest country in May 2010. Inside Facebook. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  36. Mulder, N. (2005). Inside Indonesian society: Cultural change in Java (3rd ed.). Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisius.Google Scholar
  37. Oliver, B., & Goerke, V. (2008, October 25). Undergraduate students’ adoption of handheld devices and Web 2.0 applications to supplement formal learning experiences: Case studies in Australia, Ethiopia and Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Development Using LCT, 4(3). Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  38. O’Reilly, T. (2005, September 30). What is Web 2.0? Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  39. Perraton, H., Creed, C, & Robinson, B. (2002). Teacher education guidelines: Using open and distance learning [PDF document]. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  40. Potashnik, M., & Capper, J. (1998). Distance education: Growth and diversity. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  41. Prescott, W., & Robinson, B. (1993). Teacher education at the Open University. In H. Perraton (Ed.), Distance education for teacher training (pp. 287–315). London: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
  42. Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  43. Republika (2009, May 25). PBNU: Facebook tak harus disikapi halal-haram. Republika. Retrieved May 10, 2010 from Scholar
  44. Rourke, R., Anderson, T, Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  45. Schulman, L. (1994). The wisdom of practice: Essays on teaching, learning, and learning to teach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  46. Sclater, N. (2008, June 24). Web 2.0, personal learning environments, and the future of learning management systems [PDF document]. Research Bulletin, 2008(13). Retrieved from Scholar
  47. Sclater, N. (2010, January). E-learning in the cloud. International Journal for Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(1), 10–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Selwyn, N. (2005, November). Web 2.0 applications as alternative environments for informal learning: A critical review [PDF document]. Paper presented at OECD-KERIS expert meeting, Florianopolis. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from http://www.oecd.Org/dataoecd/32/3/39458556.pdf
  49. Sims, R. (2003). Promises of interactivity: Aligning learner perceptions and expectations with strategies for flexible and online learning. Distance Education, 24(1), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tannenwald, N., & Wohlforths, WC. (2005, Spring). The role of ideas and the end of the cold war. Special issue: Ideas, international relations, and the end of the cold war. Journal of Cold War Studies, 7(2), 13–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. The Economist (2010, January 30). Global swap shops: Why social networks have grown so fast and why Facebook has become so dominant. A special report on social networking. The Economist, 5–8.Google Scholar
  52. Triandis, H., Brislin, R., & Hui, C. (1988). Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 12, 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vaquero, L., Rodero-Merino, L., Caceres, J., & Linder, M. (2009). A break in the clouds: Towards a cloud definition. Computer Communication Review, 39(1), 50–55.Google Scholar
  54. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Warschauer, M. (2008). Laptops and literacy: A multi-site case study. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 3(1), 52–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weller, M. (2010, January). The centralization dilemma in IT. International Journal for Virtual and Personal learning Environments, 1(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. The Systems Thinker. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from Scholar
  58. Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  59. Zeeng, L., Robbie, D., Adams, K. M., & Hutchison C. (2009). Where’s my class? Using Web 2.0 for collaboration in a design environment [PDF document].Google Scholar
  60. Proceedings from Ascilite 2009 (pp. 1140–1147). Retrieved May 10, 2010, from
  61. Zhang, T. (2007). A cultural look at information and communication technologies in Eastern education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael Thomas 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Burns
  • Petra Wiyakti Bodrogini

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations