Skip to main content

Virtual Learning Environments: Personalizing Learning or Managing Learners?

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning ((DEAL))

Abstract

Over the past 15 years, the Technology and LearningTeam at Nottingham Trent University has conducted a range of national research projects in schools and colleges across the UK. This first decade of the new century has seen significant changes in both the capacity and functionality of the digital technologies available to managers, teachers, and learners in schools. These technological developments have the potential to support innovative ways of learning and teaching as well as of managing educational information. Where these opportunities have been taken up, new ways of processing and owning information have occurred, leading to changes in the relationships between teachers and learners. This chapter looks at the key messages from this program of research and considers how to increase the benefits accruing from technology-enhanced learning environments and also explores their limitations for learners and teachers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banyard, P., & Underwood, J. (2008). Understanding the learning space. eLearning Papers, 1(9), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becta (2004). What the research says about Virtual learning Environments in teaching and learning. Retrieved September 22, 2008, from http://publications.teachernet.gov.uk/default.aspx?PageFunction=productdetails&PageMode=publ ications&ProductId=15003&

    Google Scholar 

  • Becta (2007). Harnessing technology schools survey 2007. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.schools.becta.org.uk/uploaddir/

  • Becta (2008). Harnessing technology: Next generation learning. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://publications.becta.org.uk/download.cfm?resID=37348

  • Becta (2009). Harnessing technology: The learner and their context increasingly autonomous: Learners using technology in the context of their family lives and beyond. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://research.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&catcode=_re_rp_02&rid=17242

  • Brophy, J., & Bawden, D. (2005). “Is Google enough? Comparison of an internet search engine with academic library resources.” Aslib Proceedings, 57(6), 498–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X. (2008). An integrated approach to modelling learning patterns of students in web-based instruction: A cognitive style perspective. ACM Transactions on Computer Interactions, 15(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, H., & Wang, T. (2000). The influence of learning style and training method on self-efficacy and learning performance in WWW homepage design training. International Journal of Information Management, 20(6), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, L., & Abbott, C. (2008). Put posters over the glass bit on the door and disappear: Tutor perspectives on the use of VLEs to support pre-service teachers. Teaching in Higher Education 13(2), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, A. B. (2001) Improving undergraduate education in the mathematical and physical sciences through the use of technology. Report to the National Science Foundation. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/teched99/Tech_Ed_Final.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • European Schoolnet (2003). Virtual learning Environments for European Schools: A survey and commentary. Brussels, EUN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, C, August, K., Brooks, R., Hancock, D., Hargreaves, D., Pearce, N., Roberts, J., Rose, J., & Wise, D. (2006). 2020 Vision: Report of the teaching and learning by 2020 review group. Nottingham: DfES publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H., Facer, K., & Rudd, T., with Dillon, P., & Humphreys P (2005). Personalisation and digital technologies. Bristol: Futurelab.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government (2005). Higher standards, better schools for all, more choice for parents and pupils. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.thedlc.org/resources/personalised_learning/higher_standards_better_schools_for_all%20chapter4.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Holah, M., & Davies, J. (2009). Delivering personalised learning through technology: The teachers’ perspective. CAL09, Brighton, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • ISIS Software (2010). http://www.isissoftware.net

  • Kelly, R. (2005). UK Secretary of State for Education and Skills, BETT 2005 Keynote address, January, 5, 2005. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.dfes.gov.uk/speeches/search_detail.cfm?ID=177

  • Larkin-Hein, T, & Budney, D. D. (2001). Research on learning style: Application in the Physics and engineering classrooms. IEEE Transactions on Education, 44(3), 276–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2004). Learning about personalisation. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.demos.co.uk/files/learningaboutpersonalisation.pdf?1240939425

    Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, C, & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/sin-gapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagi, K., & Suesawaluk, P. (2008). Research analysis of Moodle reports to gauge the level of interactivity in elearning courses at assumption university. ICCN”08: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computer and Communication Engineering, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp. 772–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ofsted (2009a). The importance of ICT, Information and communication technology in primary and secondary schools, 2005/2008. Reference no: 070035. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/content/download/8797/95679/file/VLE%20:Anevaluation%20of%20their%20development.pdf

  • Ofsted (2009b). Virtual learning environments: An evaluation of their development in a sample of educational settings. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/publications/070251

    Google Scholar 

  • Phipps, L., Cormier, D., & Stiles M. J. (2008). Reflecting on the virtual learning systems — extinction or evolution? Educational Developments, 9(2), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A., & James, M. (2004). Personalised learning: A commentary by the teaching and learning research programme. London: TLRP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior, G., & Hall, L. (2005). ICT in schools survey 2004: ICT in schools research and evaluation series 22. London: DfES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quantcast (2010). Retrieved February 10, 2010, from http://www.quantcast.com/twitter.com#summary

  • Sclater, N. (2010). eLearning in the Cloud. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments. 1(1), 10–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpies, M. (2010). Web 2.0 technologies for learning at key stages 3 and 4. Learning Sciences Research Institute. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://www.lsri.nottingham.ac.uk/web2.0/

  • Simon, H. A. (1983). Reason in human affairs. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., Rudd, P., & Coghlan, M. (2008). Harnessing technology: Schools survey 2008. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://research.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&catcode=_re_rp_02&rid=15952

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles M. (2007). Death of the VLE? A challenge to a new orthodoxy. Serials, the Journal for the International Serials Community 20(1), 31–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Superby, J., Vandamme, J., & Meskens, N. (2006). Determination of factors influencing the achievement of the first-year university students using data mining methods. In EDM’06: Workshop on Educational Data Mining (pp. 37–44). Hong Kong, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood J., Baguley, T., Banyard, P. Dillon, Farrington-Fünt, L., Hayes, M., Le Geyt, G., Murphy, J., & Selwood, I. (2010). Understanding the impact of technology: Learner and school-level factors. Coventry: Becta. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://research.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/understanding_impact_technology_learner_school_level_factors.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J., Baguley, T., Banyard, P. Dillon, G., Farrington-Flint, L. Hayes, M., Le Geyt, G., Murphy, J., & Selwood, I. (2009a). Personalising learning. Coventry, Becta. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://partners.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/reports/personalised_learning.pdf accessed February 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J., & Banyard, P. (2006). Learning and technology: A happy conjunction? In K. Steffans, R. Carneiro & J. Underwood (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and technology enhanced learning environments (pp. 64–71). Aachen: Shaker Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J., & Banyard, P. (2008). Managers,’ teachers’ and learners’ perceptions of personalised learning: Evidence from impact 2007. Technology, Pedagogy & Education. 17(3), 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, J., Ault, A., Banyard, P., Durbin, C, Hayes, M., Selwood, I., Derrick Golland, D. Hayes, M., Selwood, I. Somekh, B., Twining, P. & Woodrow, D. (2004). Connecting with broadband: Evidence from the field. Coventry: Final project report for Becta. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://research.becta.org.uk/upload-dir/downloads/page_documents/research/connecting_with_broad-band_summary.pdf

  • Underwood, J., Banyard, P., Betts, L., Farrington-Flint, L., Kerlin, L., Stiller, J. & Yeomans, S. (2009b). Narrowing the gap: An exploration of the ways technology can support approaches to narrowing the gap for under and low-achieving learners in secondary schools. Coventry: Becta. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://research.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&catcode=_re_rp_02&rid= 17439

  • Underwood, J., Banyard, P., Bird, K., Dillon, G., Hayes, M., Selwood, I. Somekh, B., Twining, P. & Woodrow, D Ault, A. (2005). The impact of broadband in schools. Coventry: Final report for Becta. Retrieved May 31, 2010, from http://research.becta.org.uk/index.php?section=rh&catcode=_re_rp_02&rid=13662

  • Weller, M. (2010) The centralisation dilemma in educational IT. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments. 1(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice, learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Michael Thomas

Copyright information

© 2011 Michael Thomas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Banyard, P., Underwood, J., Kerlin, L., Stiller, J. (2011). Virtual Learning Environments: Personalizing Learning or Managing Learners?. In: Thomas, M. (eds) Digital Education. Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230118003_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics