Advertisement

Deconstructing Formal and Informal Learning Spaces with Social Networking Sites

  • Joannah Portman Daley
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

Largely due to the expansion and popularization of user-generated and immersive Web 2.0 platforms such as MySpace, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, wikis, and other interactive digital media explorations, excitement around a new generation of learners has exploded. This generation has garnered several nicknames—the “Net Generation” and “Digital Natives,” among them—based on the overwhelming integration of digital technology into many members’ lives (Prensky, 2001; Tapscott, 1998). Furthermore, several scholars insist that, in part due to these technological advancements, these young users have become “exceptionally curious, self-reliant, contrarian, smart, focused, able to adapt, high in self-esteem, and have a global orientation” (Tapscott, 1998, p. 2), all qualities and skills that support professional success in our current knowledge-driven economy. Accordingly, there seems also to have been a change in the way that many of them gather, accept, and retain information, shifting the way they should be learning away from the “skills and drills” modes of older pedagogical styles, and firmly toward more interactive and creative ones.

Keywords

Social Networking Site Knowledge Economy Digital Technology Popular Culture Informal Learn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, J. (2006). Digital youth: Emerging literacies on the world wide web. Creskill, NJ.: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, S. B. (2006). A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States. First Monday, 11(9). Retrieved April 15, 2009, from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1394/1312Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The “digital natives” debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. boyd, d. (2007a). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity, and digitalmedia (pp. 119–142). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, d., & Ellison, N.B. (2007b). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved April 15, 2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/voll3/issuel/boyd.ellison.htmlGoogle Scholar
  6. Connors, R. (1987). Personal writing assignments. College Composition and Communication, 38(2), 166–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Danielewicz, J. (2008). Personal genres, public voices. College Composition and Communication, 59(3), 420–450.Google Scholar
  9. DigiRhet.org (2006). Teaching digital rhetoric: Community, critical engagement, and application. Pedagogy: Critical Approaches to Teaching Literature, Language, Composition, and Culture, 6(1), 231–259.Google Scholar
  10. Drucker, P. F. (1994, Nov.). The age of social transformation. The Atlantic Monthly, 274(5), 53–80. Retrieved April 19, 2006, from http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/95dec/chilearn/drucker.htmGoogle Scholar
  11. Dye, J. (2007). Meet generation C: Creatively connecting through content. eContent, 30(4). Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http://goliath.ecnext.com/coms2/gi_0199-6764528/Meet-generation-C-creatively-connecting.htmlGoogle Scholar
  12. Florida, R. (2003). Rise of the creative class. New York.: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Florida, R. (2004). America’s looming creativity crisis. Harvard Business Review. October, 122–136.Google Scholar
  14. Friedman, T. (2005). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux.Google Scholar
  15. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Gee, J. P. (2004). New people in new worlds: Networks, the new capitalism and schools. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 43–68). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks, eds. Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith. New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. Hull, G. A. (2006). Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229–233.Google Scholar
  19. Hull, G. A., & Katz, L. (2005). Crafting an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.Google Scholar
  20. Jacobs, G. (2006). Fast times and digital literacy: Participation roles and portfolio construction within instant messaging. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(2), 171–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Johnson, J., Chapman, C, & Dyer, J. (2006). Pedagogy and innovation in education with digital technologies. Paper presented at the Fourth International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication TechnologiesGoogle Scholar
  22. in Education (m-ICTE). Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http://www.formatex.org/micte2006/pdf/135-139.pdf
  23. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2005). Teen content creators and consumers. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/166/report_display.asp.Google Scholar
  24. Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking and teens. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/198/report_display.aspGoogle Scholar
  25. Lenhart, A., et al. (2008). Writing, technology and teens. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved April 19, 2009, from http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/247/report_display.aspGoogle Scholar
  26. Manovich, L. (2003). The language of new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Meyers, D.G. (2006). The elephants teach: Creative writing since 1880. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Moran, C. (1992). Computers and the writing classroom: A look to the future. In G. E. Hawisher & P. J. LeBlanc (Eds.), Re-imagining computers and composition (pp. 7–23). Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  29. Murphy, J. (2001). A short history of writing instruction: From ancient Greece to modern America. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  30. Nicolini, M. (1994). Stories can save us: A defense of narrative writing. English Journal, 3(2), 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perkel, D. (2006). Copy and paste literacy: Literacy practices in the production of a MySpace profile. Informal Learning and Digital Media. Retrieved April 19, 2007, from http://www.dream.dk/uploads/files/perkel%2020Dan.pdfGoogle Scholar
  32. Pegrum, M. (2009). From blogs to bombs: The future of digital technologies in education. Crawley, Western Australia: UWA Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Penrod, D. (1997). Miss Grundy doesn’t teach here anymore: Popular culture and the composition classroom. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.Google Scholar
  34. Pletka, B. (2007). Educating the net generation: How to engage students in the 21st century. Santa Monica, CA: Santa Monica Press.Google Scholar
  35. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.Google Scholar
  36. Reich, R. B. (1991). The work of nations: Preparing ourselves for 21st century capitalism. New York: A.A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  37. Selfe, C. L. (1999). Technology and literacy in the twenty-first century: The importance of paying attention. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Seife, C.L., & Hawisher, G. E. (Eds.) (2004). Literate lives in the information age: Narratives of literacy from the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  39. Solomon, G., & Schrum, L. (2007). Web 2.0: New tools, new schools. Eugene, OR: ISTE.Google Scholar
  40. Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Vie, S. (2008). Digital divide 2.0: Generation M and online social networking sites in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 25(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Writing in Digital Environments Research Center (WIDE) (2005). Why teach digital writing? Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 10(1), Retrieved April, 9, 2008, from englishttu.edu/kairos/10.1/binder2.html?coverWeb/wide/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  43. Wysocki, A. F., et al. (2004). Writing new media: Theory and applications for expanding the teaching of composition. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Yancey, K. B. (2004). Made not only in words: Composition in a new key. College Composition and Communication, 56(2), 297–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zappen, J. P. (2008). Digital rhetoric: Toward an integrated theory. Technical Communication Quarterly, 14(3), 319–325.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael Thomas 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joannah Portman Daley

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations