Advertisement

Teaching Research Methods with Social Media

  • Kelli S. Burns
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan’s Digital Education and Learning book series (DEAL)

Abstract

Today’s traditional undergraduate students have been raised in a digital world. The class of 2013 was born in approximately 1991, when the Internet was made available for commercial use and reached a penetration of one million computers, Tim Berners-Lee introduced the Web browser, and Linus Torvalds released the first version of the Linux operating system kernel. A lifetime of exposure to technology has created an influx of students to American colleges and universities who are skilled at using the Internet to communicate and access content via computers or handheld devices. As Driscoll (2007) stated:

Today’s tech-savvy student generation is actively participating in social networking and other online communities, so most students not only understand how to use Web 2.0 teaching tools, they thrive in the environment when Web communication solutions are integrated in the classroom, (p. 10)

Keywords

Social Medium Online Survey Skill Level Voice Over Internet Protocol Message Board 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon, I. (2003). Experiential learning in international business via the World Wide Web. Journal of Teaching in International Business, 14(2/3), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer, D., & Burrows, R. (2007). Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online, 12(5). Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.htmlGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridges, E. (1999). Experiential learning and customer needs in the undergraduate marketing research course. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(1), 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castleberry, S. B. (2001). Using secondary data in marketing research: A project that melds Web and off-Web sources. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(3), 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, I., III, Flaherty, T. B., & Mottner, S. (2001). Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(3), 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Driscoll, K. (2007). Collaboration in today’s classroom: New Web tools change the game. Multimedia & Internet @ Schools, 14(3), 9–12.Google Scholar
  7. Ferrell, O. C. (1995). Improving marketing education in the 1990s: A faculty retrospective and perspective view. Marketing Education Review, 5(3), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Granitz, N., & Hugstad, P. (2004). Creating and diffusing a technology champion course. Journal of Marketing Education, 26(3), 208–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenangel, F. L. (2002). The illusion of e-learning: Why we are missing out on the promise of technology. Retrieved April 10, 2010, from http://www.guidedlearning.com/illusions.pdfGoogle Scholar
  10. Gruca, T. S. (2000). The IEM movie box office market: Integrating marketing and finance using electronic markets. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(1), 5–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hazari, S., North, A., & Moreland, D. (2009). Investigating pedagogical value of wiki technology. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 187–198.Google Scholar
  12. Heinrichs, J. H., Lim, J.-S., & Hudspeth, L. J. (2002). Teaching strategic marketing models with Web-based business intelligence tools: Innovative guided marketing analysis. Journal of Marketing Education, 24(1), 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kelley, C. A., Conant, J. S., & Smart, D. T. (1998). Marketing education in the 21st century. American Marketing Association Summer Marketing Educators’ Conference Proceedings, 9, 204–210.Google Scholar
  14. Krentler, K. A., & Willis-Flurry, L. A. (2005). Does technology enhance student learning? The case of online discussion boards. Journal of Education for Business, 80(6), 316–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kulick, J. A. (1994). Meta-analytic studies of findings on computer-based instruction. In E. L. Baker & H. F. O’Neil, Jr. (Eds.), Technology assessment in education and training (pp. 9–33). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. McKinney, D., Dyck, J., & Luber, E. (2009). iTunes University and the classroom: Can podcasts replace professors? Computers and Education, 52(3), 617–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nagle, D. (2008). Is higher ed technology keeping up with student demand? Campus Technology. Retrieved April 10, 2009, from http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2008/10/Is-Higher-Ed-Technology-Keeping-Up-with-Student-Demand.aspx?Page=4&p=1Google Scholar
  18. Peak, D. A. (2009). Why technology in the university classroom is necessary. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 11(1), 1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.Google Scholar
  21. Roach, S. S., Johnson, M. W., & Hair, J. F., Jr. (1994). The current state of marketing education: Perceptions of marketing academicians and doctoral students. Marketing Education Review, 4(1), 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Scardamalia, M. (2002). Collective cognitive responsibility for the advancement of knowledge. In B. Smith (Ed.), Liberal education in a knowledge society (pp. 67–98). Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  23. Schrand, T. (2008). Tapping into active learning and multiple intelligences with interactive multimedia: A low-threshold classroom approach. College Teaching, 56(2), 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report of the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990–1997. Washington, DC: Software Publisher’s Association.Google Scholar
  25. Smart, D., Kelley, C. A., & Conant, J. S. (1999). Marketing education in the year 2000: Changes observed and challenge anticipated. Journal of Marketing Education, 21(3), 206–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smith, S. D., Salaway, G., & Caruso, J. B. (2009). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2009. Educause Center for Applied Research.Google Scholar
  27. Ueltschy, L. C. (2001). An exploratory study of integrating interactive technology into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 23(1), 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wang, Y., & Braman, J. (2009). Extending the classroom through Second Life. Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 235–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Michael Thomas 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kelli S. Burns

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations