Skip to main content

The Myth of Academic Freedom

Experiencing the Application of Liberal Principle in a Neoconservative Era

  • Chapter
Academic Freedom in the Post-9/11 Era

Part of the book series: Education, Politics, and Public Life ((EPPL))

Abstract

It would be difficult to improve upon the articulation of principle just quoted, especially since the statement goes on in the following subsection to state that “Faculty members have a responsibility to […] exert themselves to the limit of their intellectual capacities in scholarship, research, writing, and speaking” and that “[w]hile they fulfill this responsibility, their efforts should not be subjected to direct or indirect pressures or interference from within the university, and the university will resist to the utmost such pressures or interference when exerted from without.” In sum, “[f]aculty members can meet their responsibilities only when they have confidence that their work will be judged on its merits alone. For this reason the appointment, reappointment, promotion, and tenure of faculty members […] should not be influenced by such extrinsic considerations as political, social, or religious views, or views concerning departmental or university operation or administration. A disciplinary action against a faculty member, including dismissal for cause of faculty, should not be influenced by such extrinsic consideration.”

The University of Colorado was created and is maintained to afford men and women a liberal education in the several branches of literature, arts, sciences, and the professions. These aims can be achieved only in an atmosphere of free inquiry and discussion, which has become a tradition of universities and is called “academic freedom.” For this purpose, “academic freedom” is defined as the freedom to inquire, discover, publish and teach truth as the faculty member sees it, subject to no control or authority save the control and authority of the rational methods by which truth is established. Within the bounds of this definition, academic freedom means that members of the faculty must have complete freedom to study, to learn, to do research, and to communicate the results of these pursuits to others. The students likewise must have freedom of study and discussion. The fullest exposure to conflicting opinions is the best insurance against error […]. All members of the academic community have a responsibility to protect the university as a forum for the free expression of ideas.

—Laws of the Regents of the University of Colorado Article 5, Part D: Principles of Academic Freedom

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Portions of the Ward Churchill commentary “The Myth of Academic Freedom” have appeared in Malini Johar Schueller and Ashley Dawson’s guest-edited journal volume The Perils of Academic Freedom, special issue of Social Text 2 5.1 (Spring 2007), pp. 17–39. For the book version of this journal article, see Malini Johar Schueller and Ashley Dawson’s edited book Dangerous Professors: Academic Freedom and the National Security Campus, Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 2009, pp. 253–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • See also Rex S. Wirth, Thomas R. Whiddon, and Tony J. Manson’s edited collection What is Wrong with Academia Today?: Essays on the Politicization of American Education, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Meilen, 2008, pp. 135–204;

    Google Scholar 

  • and the edited book by Anthony J. Nocella, II, Steven Best, and Peter McLaren, Academic Repression: Reflections from the Academic Industrial Complex, Oakland, CA: AK, 2010, pp. 179–99.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Edward J. Carvalho David B. Downing

Copyright information

© 2010 Edward J. Carvalho and David B. Downing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Churchill, W. (2010). The Myth of Academic Freedom. In: Carvalho, E.J., Downing, D.B. (eds) Academic Freedom in the Post-9/11 Era. Education, Politics, and Public Life. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230117297_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics