The Neurosciences of Religion

  • William Grassie


In the last chapter, we learned how humans evolved as hunter-gatherers and how our genetic, mental, and behavioral nature was conditioned by and for this kind of life, even as we now live in a very different artificial environment created by agriculture, economic markets, and technology. We considered how evolution had shaped our predispositions for religion and what functions and dysfunctions religion might have played in our species’s history. We were introduced to the idea that the human mind was modular, that there were instinctive dispositions that then developed in conjunction with social and environmental factors into various inference systems in our brains. Religion, we were told, could be understood as a potent combination of these different inference systems in our evolved brains—agency detection, ontological categories, intuitive physics, intuitive psychology, pollution-contagion templates, memory-recall patterns, and so forth, all assembled and accessed as independent mental modules.1 This was one of several evolutionary approaches to understanding religion.


Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Religious Experience Spiritual Experience Mystical Experience Contemplative Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Boyer, Religion Explained: The Evolutionary Origins of Religious Thought (New York: Basic Books, 2001).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F. A. Azevedo et al., “Equal Numbers of Neuronal and Nonneuronal Cells Make the Human Brain an Isometrically Scaled-up Primate Brain,” Journal of Comparative Neurology 513, no. 5 (2009);Google Scholar
  3. R. W. Williams and K. Herrup, “The Control of Neuron Number,” Annual Review of Neuroscience 11 (1988).Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Andrew Newberg, “Religious and Spiritual Practices: A Neurochemical Perspective,” in Where God and Science Meet, ed. Patrick McNamara (Westport, CT: Praeger, 2006).Google Scholar
  5. 4.
    David B. Larson, “Religious Content in the Dsm-Iii-R Glossary of Technical Terms,” American Journal of Psychiatry 150 (1993).Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    David J. Hufford, “An Analysis of the Field of Spirituality, Religion, and Health,” Metanexus (2005), Scholar
  7. 6.
    V. S. Ramachandran and Sandra Blakeslee, Phantoms in the Brain (New York: HarperCollins, 1998).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    David J. Hufford, The Terror That Comes in the Night: An Experience-Centered Study of Supernatural Assault Traditions (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See Ian Barbour, Myths, Models, and Paradigms (New York: Harper and Row, 1974).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paul Ricoeur, Interpretation Theory: Discourse and the Surplus of Meaning (Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  11. 12.
    Julian Jaynes, The Origin of Consciousness in the Breakdown of the Bicameral Mind (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1976).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    John Horgan, Rational Mysticism (New York: Houghton Mifflin, 2003).Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Andrew Newberg and Eugene D’Aquili, The Mystical Mind (Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press, 1999);Google Scholar
  14. Newberg and D’Aquili, “The Neuropsychology of Religious and Spiritual Experience,” Journal of Consciousness Studies 7, nos. 11–12 (2000).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andrew Newberg and Eugene D’Aquili, Why God Won’t Go Away: Brain Science and the Biology of Belief (New York: Ballantine Books, 2001).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ronald Siegel, Intoxication (New York: E. P. Dutton, 1989).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    Jeremy Sherman, “Meditation and Future Pharmaceuticals: A Short Science Fiction,” Metanexus (1999), Scholar
  18. 20.
    D. Kelemen, “Are Children “Intuitive Theists”?: Reasoning About Purpose and Design in Nature,” Psychological Science 15 (2004);Google Scholar
  19. Justin L. Barrett, Why Would Anyone Believe in God? (Lanham, MD: Altamira, 2004);Google Scholar
  20. Paul Bloom, “Is God an Accident?” Atlantic Monthly, December 2005, Scholar
  21. 22.
    This is a compilation of different typologies of religious experience. See Ian Barbour, Religion in an Age of Science: The Gifford Lectures 1989–1991, vol. 1 (San Francisco: Harper, 1990), 36–38;Google Scholar
  22. Carolyn F. Davis, The Evidential Force of Religious Experience (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), ch 2;Google Scholar
  23. James Fowler, Stages of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and the Quest for Meaning (San Francisco: Harper, 1981).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    John B. S. Haldane, “When I Am Dead,” in Possible Worlds and Other Essays (London: Chatto and Windus, [1927] 1932).Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    B. Allan Wallace, The Taboo of Subjectivity: Towards a New Science of Consciousness (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    William J. Grassie, “Useless Arithmetic and Inconvenient Truths: A Review,” Metanexus (2007), Scholar
  27. 28.
    Jaron Lanier, “One-Half of a Manifesto: Why Stupid Software Will Save the Future from Neo-Darwinian Machines,” WIRED 8, no.12 (1999).Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    William James, A Pluralistic Universe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, [1909] 1977), 142.Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    William James, Varieties of Religious Experience (New York: Macmillian, [1902] 1961), 456.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© William Grassie 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • William Grassie

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations