Abstract
Recognizing the historical determinants of the form and content of our suffering is essential to the debate over the “right” location of suffering in politics and over the “right” legibility and, indeed, utter-ability, of the same. It is conceivable what the costs are of speaking for the others who suffer, whether to compensate or to liberate them. But when everyone speaking for oneself as such becomes the guiding principle of ethical and democratic politics, some of the issues of speech and subjectivity are rendered ahistorical and are thus ill-addressed. This confers a particular value to speech and self-presentation, and also domesticates and tokenizes those who, along with their wounds, make it to the table. This inclusion has a method, whether intentional or not, of isolating, excluding, and privileging. This happens when new maps are drawn and when a self-aggrandizing multiculturalism neuters and evacuates the politics of class, race, and gender. This also happens when philanthropic commitments render others visible in a way that makes even the master-slave dialectic seem optimistic; when our care constructs its objects monologically and only the speech that responds to us counts as speech; or when others serve as faithful illustrations of our moral conundrums or successes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Tony Kushner, Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes (New York: Theater Communications Group, 1995), 266–67.
Gunter Grass, The Tin Drum (New York: Vintage, 1990);
Milan Kundera, The Book of Laughter and Forgetting (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 1999), 231–60.
Arthur Kleinman, Veena Das, and Margaret M. Lock, eds., Social Suffering (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).
Christopher J. L. Murray and Alan Lopez, eds., The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and projected to 2020 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health, 1996).
Arthur Kleinman and Joan Kleinman, “The Appeal of Experience, The Dismay of Images: Cultural Appropriations of Suffering in Our Times,” in Social Suffering, ed. Arthur Kleinman, Margaret M. Lock, and Veena Das (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 11–15.
George Thomas Kurian, The Illustrated Book of World Rankings, 5th ed. (Armonk, NY: Sharpe Reference, 2001).
Clive Staples Lewis, The Problem of Pain (New York: HarperCollins, 2001), 91.
Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, trans. Walter Arnold Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale (New York: Vintage, 1989), 2:1, 58.
Susan Neiman, Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).
Claudia Card, The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil (New York: Oxford, 2005).
Friedrich Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy (Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific, 2005).
Shlomo Avineri’s “The Instrumentality of Passion in the World of Reason: Hegel and Marx,” Political Theory 1 (1973): 388–404
See Ludwig Feuerbach, The Fiery Brook: Selected Writings of Ludwig Feuerbach, ed. Zawar Hanfi (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1972);
Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989).
A helpful volume for plumbing the question of the sublime is Jean-François Courtine, ed., Of the Sublime: Presence in Question (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).
Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan: With Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668, ed. E. M. Curley (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994), 38.
Annette C. Baier, “Moralism and Cruelty: Reflections on Hume and Kant,” Ethics 103 (1993): 436–57;
John Kekes, “Cruelty and Liberalism,” Ethics 106 (1996): 834–44;
Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989);
Judith N. Shklar, Ordinary Vices (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1984);
Judith N. Shklar, “The Liberalism of Fear,” in Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Stanley Hoffmann (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).
Copyright information
© 2010 Asma Abbas
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Abbas, A. (2010). The Liberal Sensorium. In: Liberalism and Human Suffering. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113541_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113541_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28898-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11354-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)