Skip to main content
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

Recognizing the historical determinants of the form and content of our suffering is essential to the debate over the “right” location of suffering in politics and over the “right” legibility and, indeed, utter-ability, of the same. It is conceivable what the costs are of speaking for the others who suffer, whether to compensate or to liberate them. But when everyone speaking for oneself as such becomes the guiding principle of ethical and democratic politics, some of the issues of speech and subjectivity are rendered ahistorical and are thus ill-addressed. This confers a particular value to speech and self-presentation, and also domesticates and tokenizes those who, along with their wounds, make it to the table. This inclusion has a method, whether intentional or not, of isolating, excluding, and privileging. This happens when new maps are drawn and when a self-aggrandizing multiculturalism neuters and evacuates the politics of class, race, and gender. This also happens when philanthropic commitments render others visible in a way that makes even the master-slave dialectic seem optimistic; when our care constructs its objects monologically and only the speech that responds to us counts as speech; or when others serve as faithful illustrations of our moral conundrums or successes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Tony Kushner, Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes (New York: Theater Communications Group, 1995), 266–67.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gunter Grass, The Tin Drum (New York: Vintage, 1990);

    Google Scholar 

  3. Milan Kundera, The Book of Laughter and Forgetting (New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 1999), 231–60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur Kleinman, Veena Das, and Margaret M. Lock, eds., Social Suffering (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Christopher J. L. Murray and Alan Lopez, eds., The Global Burden of Disease: A Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and projected to 2020 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard School of Public Health, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Arthur Kleinman and Joan Kleinman, “The Appeal of Experience, The Dismay of Images: Cultural Appropriations of Suffering in Our Times,” in Social Suffering, ed. Arthur Kleinman, Margaret M. Lock, and Veena Das (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997), 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  7. George Thomas Kurian, The Illustrated Book of World Rankings, 5th ed. (Armonk, NY: Sharpe Reference, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clive Staples Lewis, The Problem of Pain (New York: HarperCollins, 2001), 91.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Friedrich Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals and Ecce Homo, trans. Walter Arnold Kaufmann and R. J. Hollingdale (New York: Vintage, 1989), 2:1, 58.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Susan Neiman, Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Claudia Card, The Atrocity Paradigm: A Theory of Evil (New York: Oxford, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Friedrich Engels, Ludwig Feuerbach and the End of Classical German Philosophy (Honolulu: University Press of the Pacific, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shlomo Avineri’s “The Instrumentality of Passion in the World of Reason: Hegel and Marx,” Political Theory 1 (1973): 388–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. See Ludwig Feuerbach, The Fiery Brook: Selected Writings of Ludwig Feuerbach, ed. Zawar Hanfi (Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1972);

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A helpful volume for plumbing the question of the sublime is Jean-François Courtine, ed., Of the Sublime: Presence in Question (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan: With Selected Variants from the Latin Edition of 1668, ed. E. M. Curley (Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Annette C. Baier, “Moralism and Cruelty: Reflections on Hume and Kant,” Ethics 103 (1993): 436–57;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. John Kekes, “Cruelty and Liberalism,” Ethics 106 (1996): 834–44;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1989);

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Judith N. Shklar, Ordinary Vices (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1984);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Judith N. Shklar, “The Liberalism of Fear,” in Political Thought and Political Thinkers, ed. Stanley Hoffmann (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2010 Asma Abbas

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Abbas, A. (2010). The Liberal Sensorium. In: Liberalism and Human Suffering. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230113541_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics