Skip to main content

Learning From adivasi (Original Dweller) Political-Ecological Expositions of Development: Claims on Forests, Land, and Place in India

  • Chapter
Indigenous Knowledge and Learning in Asia/Pacific and Africa

Abstract

Contrary to scholarly attempts at anthropologizing Adivasi (original dweller) in trie interests of knowledge production about and for purposes of legitimation and formulation of trie Indian states colonial construction (official representations) of trie Adivasi-other, that is, a construction that assists with the contemporary reproduction of governmentality and the disciplining of Adivasis into trans/national market-modernization imperatives (the assimilationist project of “capitalist development”), this chapter attempts to articulate Adivasi expositions pertaining to Adivasi-state development relations concerning claims to forests, land, and place. State-essentialist representations of Adivasis as “tribal others’” (referred to as Scheduled Tribes, or STs, enumerated in the Indian Constitution for purposes of amelioration) in need of special protection and rights and as peoples with singular, static, and bounded identities located in segregated spaces (referred to in the Constitution as Scheduled Areas) need to be recognized as apolitical exercise in exclusive governmentality and social control (see Kaushik Ghosh in this collection for related discussion). In other words, these representations need to be seen as statecraft designed for

  1. i.

    the purposes of containment and bureaucratic management of an increasingly vocal Adivasi discontent with state-market led development-dispossession (claims on forest, land, and material/cultural space) in India and around the world (Escobar, 1995; Ghosh, 2006; Kamat, 2001; Kearney, 1996; Menon & Nigam, 2007; Rajagopal, 2003);

Who wants to go to the city to join the Oriyas (dominant castes/urban outsiders) and do business and open shops and be shahari (city/ moderns) if they even give you a chance or to do labor like donkeys to get one meal? Even if they teach us, we do not want to go to the cities, as these are not the ways of the Adivasi. We cannot leave our forests (ame jangale chariparibo nahì). The forest is our second home [after the huts; meaning added]. You just come out and you have everything you need.... My friends and brothers, we are from the forest. That is why we use the small sticks of the karanja tree to brush our teeth—not tooth brushes. Our relationship to the forest is like a finger nail is to flesh (nakho koo manpho)—we cannot be separated. That is why we are Adivasi.

Kondh Adivasi elder, interview notes, village D, Orissa, India, January 2007

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baviskar, A. (1991). The researcher as pilgrim. lokayan Bulletin, 9(5), 91–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blaser, M., H. Feit, & G. McRae. (eds.). (2004). In the way of development: Indigenous peoples, life projects and globalization. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A., & R. Palan. (2004). The imagined economies of globalization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Costa, D. (2007). Tensions of neo-liberal development: State discourse and dramatic oppositions in West Bengal. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 41(3), 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. (2004). Spectres of die third world: Global modernity and the end of die three worlds. Third World Quarterly 25(1), 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandes, W. (2006). Development related displacement and tribal women. In G. Radi (ed.), Tribal development in India: The contemporary debate (pp. 112–132). New Delhi, India: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, K. (2006). Between global flows and local dams: Indigenousness, locality and the transnational sphere in Jharkhand, India. Cultural Anthropology, 21(4), 501–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grande, S. (2004). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Litdefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, S. & T. Ormiston. (forthcoming). Globalization as the new colonization: Indigenizing resistance. In D. Caouette & D. Kapoor (eds.), Beyond development and globalization: Social movement and critical perspectives (31 pages). Ottawa, Canada: Ottawa University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Indian Peoples Tribunal on Environment and Human Rights [IPTEHR] (2006). An inquiry into mining and human rights violations in Kashipur. Mumbai, India: IPEHR publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2004). Colonization as myth-making: A case study in Aotearoa. In S. Greymorning (ed.), A will to survive: Indigenous essays on the politics of culture, language and identity (pp. 95–103). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamat, S. (2001). Andiropology and global capital: Rediscovering the noble savage. Cultural Dynamics, 13(1), 29–51.

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2004). Popular education and social movements in India: State responses to constructive resistance for social justice. Convergence, 37(2), 210–215.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2008). Popular education and human rights: Prospects for antihegemonic Adivasi (original dweller) movements and counterhegemonic struggle in India. In A. Abdi & L. Shultz (eds.), Educating for human rights and global citizenship (pp. 113–128). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2009a). Subaltern social movement learning: Adivasis (original dwellers) and the decolonization of space in India. In D. Kapoor (ed.), Education, decolonization and development: Perspectives from Asia, Africa and the Americas (pp. 7–38). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2009b). Adivasi (original dwellers) ‘in the way of’ state-corporate development: Development dispossession and learning in social action for land and forests in India. McGill Journal of Education, 44(1), 55–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2009c). Participatory academic research (par) and peoples participatory action research (PAR): Research, polidcization, and subaltern social movements (SSMs) in India. In D. Kapoor & S. Jordan (eds.), Education, participatory action research, and social change: International perspectives (pp. 13–44). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (2009d). Globalization, dispossession and subaltern social movement (SSM) learning in the South. In A. Abdi & D. Kapoor (eds.), Global perspectives on adult education (pp. 71–92). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, D. (fordicoming). Subaltern social movement (SSM) post-mortems of development in contemporary India. In D. Caouette & D. Kapoor (eds.), Beyond development and globalization: Social movement and critical perspectives (40 pages). Ottawa, Canada: Ottawa University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, M. (1996). Reconceptualizing the peasantry: Anthropology in global perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludden, D. (ed.). (2005). Reathng subaltern stuthes: Critical history, contested meaning and the globalization of South Asia. New Delhi: Pauls Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P (2006). Refrarning development: Global peasant movements and the new agrarian question. Canathan Journal of Development Stuthes, 27(4), 471–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, N. & A. Nigam. (2007). Power and contestation: Intha since 1989 London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, U. (2007). The republic of hunger and other essays. Gurgaon, Intha: Three Essays Collective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimple, M. & M. Sethi. (2005). Occupation of land in Intha: Experiences and challenges. In S. Moyo & P. Years (eds.), Reclaiming land: The resurgence of rural movements in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopal, B. (2003). International law from below: Development, social movements and third world resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ramdas, S. (2009). Women, forest spaces and the law: Transgressing the boundaries. Economic and Political Weekly, 64(44), 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuhiwai-Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wani, M., & A. Kothari. (2008, September 13). Globalization vs Intha’s forests. Economic and Political Weekly, 19–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Dip Kapoor Edward Shizha

Copyright information

© 2010 Dip Kapoor and Edward Shizha

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kapoor, D. (2010). Learning From adivasi (Original Dweller) Political-Ecological Expositions of Development: Claims on Forests, Land, and Place in India. In: Kapoor, D., Shizha, E. (eds) Indigenous Knowledge and Learning in Asia/Pacific and Africa. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230111813_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics