Abstract
What is biotechnology to a diverse North America? While Mexico is a center of biodiversity that searches to protect and extend its genetic bank, the United States and Canada are world leaders in biotech production.
antal@servidor.unam.mx and cameliatigau@hotmail.com
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Bibliography
Academia Mexicana de Ciencias (AMC). 2008. Available from http://www.amc.unam.mx/
—. 2007. “Recomendaciones Generales para Consolidar la Biotecnología en México.” Available from http://www.amc.unam.mx/. Accessed October 22, 2008.
Antal, E. 2008. “Interacción entre política, ciencia y sociedad en biotecnología. La regulación de los organismos genéticamente modificados en Canadá y México.” Norteamérica 3, no. 1, (January–June): 11–63.
Antal, E. and C. Tigau. 2008. “GMO PD for biosafety in Mexico: applications of a hierarchical model of communication.” Place Branding and Public Diplomacy 5, no. 1: 38–53.
Arroche, Reyes, F. 2002. “Structural transformation and important coefficients in the North American economies.” Economic Systems Research 14, no. 3: 257–273.
Austin, J. L. 1976. How to Do Things with Words. New York: Oxford University Press. Available from http://www.ibt.unam.mx/server/PRG.base?tipo:doc,dir:PRG.curriculum,par:bolivar
Bolivar, F., ed. 2002. “Biotecnología moderna para el desarrollo de México en el Siglo XXI.” Retos y Oportunidades. Mexico City: CONACYT-Fondo de Cultura Economica.
Braman, S. 2002. “Informational meta-technologies, international relations and genetic power: the case of biotechnologies.” Information Technologies and Global Politics: The Changing Scope of Power and Governance. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Ed., J. Rosenau and J. P. Singh. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 91–114.
Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee (CBAC). 2008. Available from www.cbac-cccb.ca.
—. 2007. “Many perspectives, one source. Annual Report, 2006.” Available from http://strategis.ic.gc.ca/epic/site/cbac-cccb.nsf/vwapj/CBAC_2006_Annual_Report_EN.pdf/$FILE/CBAC_2006_Annual_Report_EN.pdf. Accessed October 22, 2008.
CIBIOGEM. 2007. Legislación Mexicana en Materia de Bioseguridad. Available from http://www.cibiogem.gob.mx/normatividad.html. Accessed October 22, 2008.
Crovi D., D. Aquirre, J. Apodaca, O. Camacho, O. Davida, and C. Zaragoza. 2002. “Página web. Una propuesta para su análisis.” Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Sociales no. 185 (May–August): 167–188. Mexico City: UNAM, FCPyS.
Gül, Murat. 2009. “The concept of change and James N. Rosenau: Still international relations?” African Journal of Political Science and International Relations 3, no. 5 (May): 199–207.
Hagendijk, R., and E. Kallerud. 2003. Changing Conceptions and Practices of Governance in Science and Technology in Europe: A Framework for Analysis. STAGE (Science, Technology and Governance in Europe), Discussion Paper 2. Amsterdam University and NIFU, Norway.
Halffman, W., and R. Hoppe. 2005. “Science/Policy boundaries: a changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice.” Ed., S. Maasen, and P. Weingart. Democratization of Expertise? Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol. 24. New York: Springer, 135–51.
Interministerial Commision for Biosafety of Genetically Modified Organisms (CIBIOGEM). Available from www.cibiogem.gob.mx.
Jasanoff, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
—. 2005. “Let them eat cake: GM foods and the democratic imagination.” Science and Citizens. Ed., M. Leach, I. Scoones, and B. Wynne. London: Zed Books, 183–99.
Nadal, A. 2008. “Reglamento sobre bioseguridad: El pecado mortal.” La Jornada, March 26. Available from www.lajornada.unam.mx. Accessed May 15.
Pavlik, J.V. 1999. La investigación en relaciones públicas. Barcelona: Gestión 2000.
Rosenau, J.N. 1990. Turbulence in World Politics: A Theory of Change and Continuity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
—. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Royal Society of Canada (RSC). 2008. Available from www.rsc.ca.
—. 2001. “Expert panel on the future of food biotechnology: summary statement.” Available from http://www.rsc.ca//files/publications/expert_panels/foodbiotechnology/GMstatementEN.pdf. Accessed October 15, 2008.
Salgado, E. 2003. El discurso del poder. Informes presidenciales en México. Mexico City: CIESAS, Editorial Miguel Ángel Porrua.
Tigau, C.N. 2004. “Metadiscursos bélicos de cinco organizaciones internacionales: Un análisis formal y discursivo de sus sitios web. Hacia la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento, Memorias de PANAM II. Ed., Crovi Druetta. Mexico City: UNAM, 177–89.
Toledo, V. M. 2005. “Ciencia sin conciencia: la Ley de Bioseguridad.” La Jornada, March 11. Available from www.lajornada.unam.mx. Accessed April 23, 2006.
Unión de Científicos Comprometidos con la Sociedad (UCCS). 2008. Available from www.unionccs.org. Accessed January 12, 2008.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2010 Imtiaz Hussain
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Antal, E., Tigau, C. (2010). Mexico-Canada Biotech Image: The Role of the Broader Scientific Community. In: Hussain, I. (eds) The Impacts of NAFTA on North America. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230110007_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230110007_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-28906-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-11000-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)