Skip to main content

Mechanisms of Transitional Justice

  • Chapter
  • 467 Accesses

Part of the book series: Perspectives on Comparative Politics ((PCP))

Abstract

How should countries emerging from authoritarian rule or protracted civil war deal with the human rights abuses committed by the previous regime and members of society? This is an important question because how governments address the past human rights abuses affects the present and future relationship between perpetuators and victims, as well as a country’s transition to democracy and the legitimacy of the new political system. Over the last three decades, various mechanisms of transitional justice have been developed with the objectives of uncovering the truth of events, providing accountability for crimes, and promoting individual and societal reconciliation. The study of transitional justice has produced a broad literature that explores under what conditions different accountability mechanisms, whether domestically driven or internationally inspired, are capable of addressing the human rights violations and assisting in the consolidation of democracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Buergenthal, Thomas. 2006/2007. “Turth Commissions: Between Impunity and Prosecution.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 38:217–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, Jarat, and Thomas G. Weiss. 1998. “Sovereignty is No Longer Sacrosanct: Codifying Humanitarian Intervention.” In International Law: Classic and Contemporary Readings, ed. Charlotte Ku, and Paul F. Fiehl. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakolias, Maria, and Kim Thachuk. 2000. “Attacking Corruption in the Judiciary: A Critical Process in Judicial Reform.” Wisconsin International Law Journal 18:353–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayner, Priscilla. 1994. “Fifteen Truth Commissions—1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study.” Human Rights Quarterly 16:597–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, Manley O. 1938. “The Proposed International Criminal Court.” The American Journal of International Law 32:549–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye, Mike. 1997. “The Role of Truth Commissions in the Search for Justice, Reconciliation and Democratisation: The Salvadoran and Honduran Case.” Journal of Latin American Studies 29:693–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayerfeld, Jamie. 2003. “Who Shall Be Judge?: The United States, the International Criminal Court, and the Global Enforcement of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 25:93–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingst, Karen A., and Margaret P. Karns. 2000. The United Nations in the Post-Cold Wart Era. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pella, Vespasian V., 1950. “Towards an International Criminal Court.” The American Journal of International Law 44:37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Steven D., and Lilian A. Barria. 2006. Designing Criminal Tribunals: Sovereignty and International Concerns in the Protection of Human Rights. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, Steven D., and Lilian A. Barria. 2005. “Assessing the Record of Justice: A Comparison of Mixed International Tribunals versus Domestic Mechanisms for Human Rights Enforcement.” Journal of Human Rights 4:521–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer, David J. 2000. “The U.S. Perspective on the ICC.” In The United States and the International Criminal Court, ed. Sarah B. Sewall, and Carl Kaysen. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shestack, Jerome J. 1998. “The Philosophic Foundations of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 20:201–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaar, Elin. 1999. “Truth Commissions, Trials—or Nothing? Policy Options in Democratic Transition.” Third World Quarterly 20:1109–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack, and Leslie Vinjamuri. 2003/2004. “Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice.” International Security 28:5–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2010 Lilian A. Barria and Steven D. Roper

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barria, L.A., Roper, S.D. (2010). Mechanisms of Transitional Justice. In: Barria, L.A., Roper, S.D. (eds) The Development of Institutions of Human Rights. Perspectives on Comparative Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109483_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics