Abstract
This chapter explores differing perceptions of health risks, as well as the role of experts and the state in mitigating such risks. Looking at food safety as a particular form of health risk management, this chapter examines diverging and converging trends in the EU and United States with regard to food regulation and the introduction of genetically modified (GM) foods. Food safety in America and the European Union is greatly influenced by global trade in food commodities putting pressure on governments to adapt policies that will grant consumers cheap and immediate access to exotic foods.1 Both the EU and the United States utilize their federal structures to control product access to their domestic or internal markets, but, as noted in chapter 1, considerable experimentation and testing of new food products and methods of food production is taking place at the state and member state levels. Consumer protection and the power that food producers have in the United States and the EU present different venues and conditions for monitoring food production and for consumers to make informed choices about the risks they expose themselves to.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Fink, W. and M. Rodemeyer. 2007. “Genetically Modified Foods: US Public Opinion Research Polls.” In Media, the Public, and Agricultural Biotechnology, 126–159, edited by D. Brossard (Wallingford, GBR: CABI Publishing).
Pidgeon, N.F., W. Poortinga, G. Rowe, T. Horlick-Jones, J. Walls, and T. O’Riordan. 2005. “Using Surveys in Public Participation Processes for Risk Decision-Making: The Case of the 2003 British GM Nation? Public Debate.” Risk Analysis 25:467–480.
Schueller, Gretel 2009. “Lisa Weasel on GMOs.” Eating Well, April, 14.
Gorman, Sean P. 2005. Networks, Security and Complexity: The Role of Public Policy in Critical Infrastructure Protection (Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar)
Baranowski, T. M. and E. J. LeBoeuf. 2008. “Consequence Management Utilizing Optimization.” Journal of Resource Planning and Management 134:386–394
de Bruijne, Mark and Michel van Eeten. 2007. “Systems That Should Have Failed: Critical Infrastructure Protection in an Institutionally Fragmented Environment.” Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 15:18–29
Copyright information
© 2010 Lina M. Svedin, Adam Luedtke, and Thad E. Hall
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Svedin, L.M., Luedtke, A., Hall, T.E. (2010). Food Safety, Health, and Biological Risk Perception. In: Risk Regulation in the United States and European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109476_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109476_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38287-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10947-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)