Abstract
Serious questions arise on the benefits to India of going overtly nuclear in May 1998. There had already existed a state of opaque or existential deterrence between India and its neighbors, China and Pakistan, and whether the 1998 nuclear tests make deterrence any more robust is questionable. Like the general concept of nuclear deterrence, India’ declared policy of minimum deterrence remains a chimera. However, UN Security Council Resolution 1172 passed in June 1998 is unprecedented insofar as it urges India and Pakistan to sign the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT), a demand that cannot be supported by international law. If India’ decision to go nuclear may lack strategic, political and economic benefits, there are even more serious flaws underlying the NPT and CTBT that have not been addressed. The U. S. policy of aggressively pursuing its missile defense program further complicates this international state of affairs. It is unfortunate that India, which earlier opposed the global arms race, has now come out in support of the U. S. program.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
See Itty Abraham, The Making of the Indian Atomic Bomb: Science, Secrecy and the Postcolonial State (New Delhi: Orient Longman, 1999)
See Lillian Craig Harris, China Considers the Middle East (London: I. B. Tauris, 1993), p. 258.
See William E. Burroughs and Robert Windrem, Critical Mass: The Dangerous Race for Superweapons in a Fragmenting World (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1994), pp. 60–90
Eric Chauvistre, “The Future of Nuclear Inspections,” Arms Control, Vol. 14, No. 2 (August 1993), p. 51.
Quoted in Matthias Kuntzel, Bonn and the Bomb: German Politics and the Nuclear Option (London: Pluto Press, 1995), p. 124.
See on this period Kuntzel, op cit., and Jeffrey Boutwell, The German Nuclear Dilemma (London: Brassey’, 1990).
Peter van Ham, Managing Non-Proliferation Regimes in the 1990s: Power, Politics and Policies (New York: Council for Foreign Policy, 1993).
Stephen M Meyer, The Dynamics of Nuclear Proliferation (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984), p. 112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2002 D. R. SarDesai and Raju G. C. Thomas
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Varadarajan, S. (2002). The International Dynamics of a Nuclear India. In: SarDesai, D.R., Thomas, R.G.C. (eds) Nuclear India in the Twenty-First Century. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109230_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109230_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38779-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10923-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)