Abstract
This chapter analyzes the relationship between the rise of xenophobic parties and changes in immigration and asylum policy.1 Although one reason for the concern about xenophobic parties has been their potential influence on immigration policy, there is not a substantial body of literature that either theorizes on or empirically addresses the question of these parties’ effects on legislation. There is one unambiguous case in which the electoral breakthrough of a xenophobic party had a profound and sustained effect on the political agenda regarding immigration policy. In France, where the Front National (National Front) broke through at the moment when the issue of how to integrate immigrants was novel and pressing, the party maintained a consistent focus on the issue, and mainstream parties were forced to develop policy responses to stop the Front National’s (FN) growing influence (Schain 1988, 1996, Shields 1997). Whether the FN can serve as a model for other countries is problematic, both because xenophobic parties have not been as integral to the politicization of the issue as in France, and because these parties have been less consistent in their focus on the issue than in France.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2002 Schain, Zolberg, and Hossay
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Perlmutter, T. (2002). The Politics of Restriction. In: Schain, M., Zolberg, A., Hossay, P. (eds) Shadows over Europe. Europe In Transition: The Nyu European Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109186_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230109186_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-38820-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10918-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)