Skip to main content
  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

Early in 1960, the Educational Policies Commission of the National Education Association (NEA) circulated a draft policy document that sought to clarify for the nation the necessary function of the public schools.The manuscript, entitled “The Controlling Purposes of American Education,” was occasioned by the rapid changes that were taking place in all facets of society. It began by laying out the fundamental assumptions that needed to be considered in reconstituting education in the United States. Foremost among these was the new social role that science had assumed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Introduction

  • 1. Educational Policies Commission, “The Controlling Purposes of American Education,” unpublished typescript, 8 January 1960, pp. 3, 7, 9, box 3, Muller Papers.This document was later published under the title The Central Purpose of American Education (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • 2. See, for example, Educational Policies Commission, Education for All American Youth (Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1944).

    Google Scholar 

  • 3. See Bruce V. Lewenstein, “‘Public Understanding of Science’ in America, 1945–1965” (Ph.D. diss., University of Pennsylvania, 1987); and James Gilbert, Redeeming Culture: American Religion in an Age of Science (Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • 6. For a summary of the social studies curriculum controversy, see “The National Science Foundation and Pre-College Science Education.” On the changing priorities of education in the 1970s, see Diane Ravitch, The Troubled Crusade: American Education, 1945–1980 (New York: Basic Books, 1983), 228–266; and Joel Spring, The Sorting Machine Revisited: American Educational Policy Since 1945, updated ed. (New York: Longman, 1989), 93–150. 206

    Google Scholar 

  • Two of the more influential statements on science education that have assimilated the intellectual legacy of the NSF curriculum projects are:American Association for the Advancement of Science, Project 2061: Science for All Americans (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science, 1989); and National Research Council, National Science Education Standards (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2002 John L. Rudolph

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rudolph, J.L. (2002). Introduction. In: Scientists in the Classroom. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107366_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics