Skip to main content

The Emergent Global and Asian Regional Order: Complementarity and Divergence

  • Chapter
Twenty-First Century World Order and the Asia Pacific
  • 79 Accesses

Abstract

Contrary to a general assumption that international relations (IR) scholars are concerned solely with explanation but not prediction, there is no lack of scholarly attempts to divine world order in the coming millennium. For example, in a special issue of the International Studies Review, Davis B. Bobrow (who is also a contributor to the present book) lined up an international group of IR scholars to offer their “conjectures” about the next millennium (Bobrow-ISR 1999). They did so from a wide range of perspectives including: realpolitik, economic systems, new social technology, identity change, and the like.1 But our book is of a different sort, in at least two distinct ways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Auer, James C. 1992. “The Global Influence of Japanese Defense Efforts.” In The Pacific in the 1990s: Economic and Strategic Change, edited by Janos Radvanyi. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin. 1995. Jihad vs. McWorld: How the Planet is Both Falling Apart And Coming Together and What This Means for Democracy. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Richard K. 1996. “Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia and the United States after the Cold War.” In Brown, Lynn-Jones, and Miller 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binnendijk, Hans. 1999. “Back to Bipolarity?” In Strategic Forum (May). Published by the Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow, Davis B. 1999. “Prospecting the Future.” In Bobrow-ISR 1999, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrow-ISR 1999. “Prospects for International Relations: Conjectures about the Next Millennium.” International Studies Review 1, no. 21 (Summer); special issue, edited by Davis Bobrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borthwick, Mark. 1992. Pacific Century: The Emergence of Modern Pacific Asia. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken, Paul. 1999. “The Second Nuclear Age.” Foreign Affairs 79, no. 1: 146–156. Also his Fire in the East: Rise of East Asian Military Power and the Second Nuclear Age (New York: HarperCollins, 1999), from which his Foreign Affairs article was adopted.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Michael E., Sean M. Lynn-Jones, and Steven E. Miller, eds. 1996. East Asian Security. Cambridge, MS: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burks, Ardath. 1956. “Part Two: The Government and Politics of Japan,” in Far East Governments and Politics, by Paul Linebarger, Djang Chu, and Ardath Burks. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvocoressi, Peter. 1991. World Politics Since 1945, 6th ed. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Thomas J. 1999. “China, the U.S.-Japan Alliance, and the Security Dilemma in East Asia.” International Security 23, no. 4 (Spring): 49–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, Jason D., and Todd M. Koca. 2000. “China Rising: New Challenges to the U.S. Security Posture.” Strategic Forum, no. 175 (October). Published by the Institute for National Strategic Studies, National Defense University, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • FEER. 2000. “Lee: The Cruel Game.” Far Eastern Economic Review (8 June): 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, Andre Gunder. 1998. ReOrient: Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, Wolfgang. 1964. The Changing Structure of International Law. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funabashi, Yoichi. 2000. “Japan’s Moment of Truth.” Survival 42, no. 4: 73–84. Quarterly published by the International Institute of Strategic Studies (IISS), London.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, Banning, and Bonnie Glaser. 1997. “Chinese Apprehensions about Revitalization of the U.S.-Japanese Alliance.” Asian Survey, 37, no. 4: 383–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert. 1987. The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godwin, H. B., and Evan S. Medeiros. 2000. “China, America, and Missile Defense: Conflicting National Interests.” Current History 99, no. 638: 285–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Grasci. New York: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Michael J., and Toby F. Dalton. 2000. “Asian Reactions to U.S. Missile Defense.” NBR Analysis 11, no.3. Available online at: http://www.nbr.org/publications/analysis/volino3/index.html.

  • Han, Xiu. 2000. “Correspondences with Ohe Kenzaburo.” The Open Magazine (Hong Kong), no. 162 (June 2000):92–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastedt, Glann, and Kay Knickrehm, eds. 1994. Toward the 21st Century. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog, Peter J. 1993. Japan’s Pseudo-Democracy. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung, James C. 1993. Asia Pacific in the New World Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung, James C. 1997. Anarchy and Order: The Interplay of Politics and Law in International Relations. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung, James C. 2000. “Diplomacy Against Adversity: Foreign Relations under Chiang Ching-kuo,” Asian Affairs 27, no. 2: 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiung, James C. 2000b. Hong Kong the Super Paradox: Life After Return to China. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations: Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew, and Ngaire Woods, eds. 1999. Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. New York and London: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ienaga, Saburo. 1996. “The Glorification of War in Japanese Education.” In Brown, Lynne-Jones, and Miller 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoguchi, Takashi. 1999. “Peering into the Future by Looking Back: The Westphalian, the Philadelphian, and the Anti-Utopian Paradigms.” In Bobrow-ISR 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervis, Robert, Richard Ned Lebow, and Janice Gross Stein, eds. 1989. Psychology & Deterrence. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. and Joseph S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khalilzad, Z, et al. 1999. The United States and a Rising China. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindleberger, Charles. 1973. The World in Depression, 1929–1939. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Reissued in a revised edition in 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, Alexandre. 1992. “The Implications of Global Change for the International Legal System.” In Edith Brown Weiss 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klare, Michael T. 2000. “A Return to Resource Wars?” Current History 99, no. 641 (December): 403–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, Nicholas D. 1993. “The Rise of China.” Foreign Affairs 72, no. 5: 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristof, Nicholas D. and Shirley WuDunn. 2000. Thunder From the East: Portrait of a Rising Asia. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 1999. The Return of Depression Economics. New York: WW Norton. Reissued in paperback in 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapid, Yosef. 1989. “The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era.” International Studies Quarterly 33, no. 3 (September): 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leifer, Michael, ed. 2000. Asian Nationalism. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, Jennifer M. 2000. “Correspondence: Spirals, Security, and Stability in East Asia.” International Security 24, no. 4 (Spring): 190–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Staffan B. 1986. The Pacific Century: Economic and Political Consequences of Asian-Pacific Dynamism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCord, William. 1991. The Dawn ofthe Pacific Century: Implications for Three Worlds of Development. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • May, Greg. 2000. “Reality Check: Beijing Must Factor into Missile Defense Equation.” The Nixon Center, available online at: http://www.nixoncenter.org-publications/Reality%20Check/6_09-00ChinaNMD.html.

  • Meyer, Milton W 1993. Japan: A Concise History, 3rd ed. Lanham, MD: Littlefield Adams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, James. 2000. “Chinese Nationalism, U.S. Policy and Asian Security.” Survival, 42 no. 4 (Winter): 51–72. London: International Institute of Strategic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Charles A., ed. 1967. The Chinese Mind: Essentials of Chinese Philosophy and Culture. Honolulu, HI: East-West Center Press, University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neterowicz, Eva M. 1989. The Tragedy of Tibet. Washington, D.C.: Council for Social and Economic Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanlon, Michael. 2000. “Why China Cannot Conquer Taiwan?” International Security 25, no. 2:51–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oye, Kenneth A., Robert J. Lieber, and Donald Rothchild. 1987. Eagle Resurgent? The Reagan Era in American Foreign Policy. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirages, Dennis. 1978. Global Ecopolitics: The New Context of International Relations. North Scituate, MS: Duxbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radtke, Kurt, and Raymond Feddema, eds. 2000. Comprehensive Security in Asia: Views from Asia and the West on a Changing Security Environment. Leiden, Boston, and Koln: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenau, James N. 1997. Along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Robert. 1999. “The Geography of Peace: East Asia in the Twenty-First Century.” International Security 23, no. 4 (Spring): 81–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Robert. 2000. “The 1995–1996 Taiwan Strait Confrontation: Coercion, Credibility, and the Use of Force.” International Security 25, no. 2: 87–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, Jan Aart. 2000. Globalization: A Critical Introduction. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack L. 1989. “Preceptors of the Security Dilemma in 1914.” In Jervis, Lebow, and Stein. 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, Arthur A. 1990. Why Nations Cooperate. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tammen, Ronald, et al. 2000. Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century. New York: Seven Bridges Press (Chatham House Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, William. 1970. China and the Foreign Powers: The Impact of and Reaction to Unequal Treaties. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNA-USA. 2000a. Global Agenda 2000–2001: Issues Before the 55th General Assembly ofthe United Nations, edited by John Tessitore and Susan Woolfson. An annual publication of the United Nations Association of the United States of America. Lanham and New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNA-USA 2000b. “United Nations Hosts Millennium Summit.” The Interdependent 26, no. 3:5–7. New York: United Nations Association of the United States of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Walt van Praag, Michael C. 1987. The Status of Tibet. Boulder, CO: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varshney, Ashutosh. 2000. “Why Have Poor Democracies Not Eliminated Poverty?” Asian Survey 60, no. 5: 718–736. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth N. 1979. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Gangmao. 1999. Post-Crisis Economic Landscape: Re-Takeoff and Integration of East Asian Economies. Paper delivered at the International Conference on the Challenges of Globalization, 21-22 October 1999, Bangkok. Available online: fbawkm@nus.edu.sg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Edith Brown 1989. In Fairness to Future Generations: International Law, Patrimony, and Intergenerational Equity. Irving, NJ: Transaction Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Edith Brown ed. 1992. Environmental Change and International Law: New Challenges and Dimensions. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2001 James C. Hsiung

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hsiung, J.C. (2001). The Emergent Global and Asian Regional Order: Complementarity and Divergence. In: Twenty-First Century World Order and the Asia Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230107175_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics