Abstract
This chapter confronts the ways that education has been largely overtaken by economic language and logic, and it suggests an alternative. It begins by criticizing educational economism across the political spectrum and then draws on the work of Marcel Mauss to propose rethinking of educational provision and obligation. The fiscal right has championed economism in the form of neoclassical economics or neoliberalism. This is the dominant economism applied to education, and it drives educational policy, curriculum reform, school practice and culture, and pedagogical ideals while redefining public education through the lens of private business. As part of a broader social logic, right-wing economism applies business ideals and categories to schooling by using such terms as competition, choice, efficiency, consumption, and accountability to describe educational policy, and in so doing, shifts the public and democratic possibilities of schooling to the realm of the private and the for-profit. Neoliberal education applies a managerialist logic of rationalization, imagining schooling as a business enterprise, describing public education as a private market, thinking of knowledge as commodities, and proposing an entrepreneurial vision for teachers who are expected to compete for grants and for merit pay, and for students who are offered money for grades.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Gramsci’s influence on Althusser is particularly evident by reading Gramsci’s “The Modern Prince” in Antonio Gramsci, Selections From The Prison Notebooks (ed.), Quintin Hoare and Geoffrey Nowell Smith New York: International Publishers, 1971
Althusser’s Machiavelli and Us, New York: Verso, 1999.
See, for example, Michael Apple, Ideology and Curriculum, New York: Routledge, 1979
Henry Giroux, Teachers as Intellectuals, Westport: Bergin & Garvey, 1988.
Jean Baudrillard, The Mirror of Production, Telos Press, 1975. In education, see Stanley Aronowitz and Henry Giroux Education Still Under Siege, Westport: Greenwood, 1989
See, for example, Aronowitz and Giroux, Education Still Under Siege, Westport: Bergin and Garvey, 1989.
Lawrence Grossberg, Caught in the Crossfire, Boulder: Paradigm Publishers 2005.
Chantal Mouffe On the Political, New York: Routledge, 2005, p. 20.
See, for example, John Chubb and Terry Moe’s Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press (1990)
Milton Friedman’s Capitalism and Freedom, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
Marcel Mauss, The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies, New York: Norton, 1990.
For an excellent discussion of Mauss and his critics and theories of the gift generally, see David Graeber, Toward and Anthropological Theory of Value: The False Coin of Our Own Dreams, New York: Palgrave, 2001.
Donaldo Macedo’s Literacies of Power: What Americans are Not Allowed to Know New York: Westview Press (1993)
Mauss’ perspective does have some limitations for thinking education beyond economism. First, in the courses of making the entire social world economic, as Marshal Sahlins highlights, Mauss lacks an adequate theory of political society. See Marshal Sahlins’s Stone Age Economics, New York: Transaction Publishers, 1972.
Copyright information
© 2010 Kenneth J. Saltman
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Saltman, K.J. (2010). The Gift of Education: Education Beyond Economism. In: The Gift of Education. Education, Politics, and Public Life. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105768_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105768_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-61515-1
Online ISBN: 978-0-230-10576-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)